Reconstruction of the water supply system on Sadova, Parkova, Shkilna streets of the village of Styike, Beryslav district, Kherson region (damaged as a result of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation)


Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Development and rehabilitation of municipal infrastructure of subnational governments
Maturity level
74
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project of reconstruction of the water supply network is a complex of construction works on an already commissioned facility, which involves changing its technical and economic indicators, improving the quality of water supply and improving operating conditions. The main stages of reconstruction. The process is implemented in several stages: Design: includes obtaining technical specifications from the water supply organization, developing a feasibility study and working drawings. Preparatory work: coordinating the location of existing underground communications with their owners, fencing the work area. Construction and installation works: Development of trenches (the depth is usually 1.5-2 m, depending on the level of soil freezing). Dismantling of old and laying new pipelines (for example, replacing steel pipes with polyethylene). Installation of shut-off valves, fire hydrants and arrangement of wells. Commissioning work: flushing and disinfection of the network, hydraulic tests for strength and tightness. 

The purpose of the project

Main Goal:

Rebuilding the damaged/destroyed

Secondary Goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards, Increasing compliance with modern standards, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Improving the quality of services

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

Improving the condition of the water supply network infrastructure and modernizing it to meet modern standards, increasing the level of compliance with modern standards, and improving the quality of utility services.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

Specific problems that will be closed: 1. Technical and operational. Elimination of accidents: Replacing old pipes with new ones (PE-100 or VChShG) practically reduces the number of breakthroughs to zero. The service life of such materials is 50+ years. Pressure stabilization: Thanks to cleaning the network from long-term deposits and rust, throughput is restored. Water will finally reach the upper floors without additional pumps. Tightness of shut-off valves: Installing modern valves will allow you to locally disconnect only one house for repairs, and not the entire neighborhood. 2. Economical. Reduction of water losses: You eliminate “hidden leaks” when water simply goes into the sand. This is a direct saving for the budget of the water utility and communities. Reduction of repair costs: Fuel costs for emergency crews, excavations, and temporary clamps are sharply reduced. Energy efficiency: Lower resistance in the new pipes allows pumping stations to operate with less load, which reduces electricity costs (regulated by the Energy Efficiency Law). 3. Social and sanitary. Water quality: The problem of “rusty water” from the tap disappears, which appears due to internal corrosion of steel pipes. Fire safety: Installation of new fire hydrants according to the requirements of DBN V.2.5-74:2013 guarantees the necessary water flow for extinguishing fires. Uninterruptible power supply: Residents receive predictable service instead of sudden shutdowns “until the circumstances are clarified”. 4. Environmental. Soil protection: The absence of constant leaks prevents the washing away of the foundations of neighboring buildings and the subsidence of roads. Rational use of resources: Less water pumped from the subsoil — less impact on aquifers.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of IDP users

97 human

Number of people who will use the service

864 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Municipal infrastructure and services

Subsector

Development and Reconstruction of Subnational Infrastructure

Stream

Development and rehabilitation of municipal infrastructure of subnational governments

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

1.1.2 Ensure the development of cultural and local heritage protection centers that form local self-awareness and bind residents to their places of residence

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
Share of residents of a settlement who will be provided with drinking water supply
0 %
100 %

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

При оцінці попиту для проєкту реконструкції водопровідної мережі у 2026 році застосовується комплексна методологія, що поєднує нормативний, ретроспективний та прогнозний аналізи.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
100 %
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?

No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?

Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?

No consultations were held with target groups.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Women's participation is ensured at various stages of planning (including public hearings)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?

None of the options are applicable

Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?

Mandatory training for project staff on gender equality and inclusion is provided
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Justification of financial support mechanisms.docx
30.01.2026
11:55:27 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Reconstruction of the water supply system on Sadova, Parkova, Shkilna streets of the village of Styike, Beryslav district, Kherson region (damaged as a result of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation)

Technical Solution 2

Current repairs of the water supply system on the streets of the settlement of the village of Styike, settlement territorial community

Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)61'421'920 UAH465'000 UAH
For preparation945'248 UAH15'000 UAH
For implementation60'476'672 UAH450'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost27'639'865 UAH13'501 UAH
For operation27'639'864 UAH13'500 UAH
For closing1 UAH1 UAH
Average annual costs921'329 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.13 months3 months
Deadline for developing a FFS1 month1 month
Implementation period12 months2 months
Service life360 months24 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active

[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Rejected

[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Components of a technical solution
To components
0
To components
0

Commercial Justification

Supplier and contractor market assessment

Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, both national and international

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
Закупівлі проводяться відповідно до вимог законодавства

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
Планується застосувати інструменти та механізми такі як, ProZorro, незалежний нагляд, публічне звітування)

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
Open competitive bidding

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Pre-market engagement
здійснено огляд відкритих тендерів, консультації з експертами, аналіз аналогічних проєктів

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Potential market participants
будуть дотримані вимоги передбачені правовими нормами законодавства

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Market readiness assessment
проєктна документація готова до реалізації, підтверджені джерела для фінансування реалізації проєкта відсутні

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial justification

Total project budget

Total preliminary budget89'061'785 UAH478'501 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)61'421'920 UAH465'000 UAH
For preparation945'248 UAH15'000 UAH
For implementation60'476'672 UAH450'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost27'639'865 UAH13'501 UAH
For operation27'639'864 UAH13'500 UAH
For closing1 UAH1 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Average project cost per service recipient

Service Unitодиниця
Service Unit Cost68'474 UAH

Profitability of the project

Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Is the project self-sustaining?No

Availability of services

Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
No – analysis not performed

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Financing Mechanisms

Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

Source and MechanismYesNo

Funding Sources

Approved Funds945'248 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds945'248 UAH0 UAH

Public-private partnership

Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Management Rationale

Team competencies

Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - economic analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - communication with stakeholders

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - risk management

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - social and gender analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - public consultations

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of available procurement options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - legal support

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial analysis - financial analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - demand analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of the market environment

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Partially, we have limited experience

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
Economic justification - environmental expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
Specialists in interaction with international financial organizations (IFOs)

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial consultants/modelers

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Technical experts

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Social/gender consultants

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Risk assessment

Social riskDefinedUndefined

Organizational events

ResponseDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?

None of the options are applicable

Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

None of the options are applicable
Need for financing

Does the project require additional funding for preparation?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
02/02/2026SP-L-020226-2EDB6665Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeStrategic fit confirmed-
11/02/2026SPP-L-110226-F8E79E2CCommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeStrategic fit confirmed74