New construction of a civil defense building (shelter) in Bratsk Lyceum No. 2 of the Bratsk Village Council, Voznesensky District, Mykolaiv Region


Sector
Education and science
Stream
Arrangement of civil defense structures (shelters) in educational institutions
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

A new construction of a protective structure is planned on the territory of Bratsk Lyceum No. 2 of the Bratsk Settlement Council of the Voznesensky District of the Mykolaiv Region at the address: Mykolaiv Region, Voznesensky District, Bratske Village.

A monolithic reinforced concrete structure that provides a safe space is intended for shelter and temporary protection of students and staff from the negative impact of emergencies, military operations, or terrorist acts, including for low-mobility population groups.
The building is one-story, rectangular in plan, of a sunken type with a bank.
Planning scheme of the premises – enfilade.
Entrance to the premises is organized from the adjacent territory via two external independent staircases.
According to the results of calculations and the Customer's instructions, the PRU can shelter up to 250 people for at least 48 hours.
The facility is designed taking into account the possible visit of all types of MGN. The system of information support facilities is provided on all routes accessible to MGN for the entire period of operation.
Providing a full-time and safe training system for all participants in the educational process.

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Creation of new facilities and services

Secondary goal:

Ensuring inclusiveness and equal opportunities

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

Creating a safe space for the educational institution for continuous learning during emergencies by building a new protective structure. Currently, there is no appropriate protective structure in Bratsk Lyceum No. 2.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

To fully cover all students with in-person education, it is necessary to build additional shelter.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of people who will use the service

250 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Education and science

Subsector

School education

Stream

Arrangement of civil defense structures (shelters) in educational institutions

Strategic document

Task

1.2.1 Repairs and reconstruction of educational institutions taking into account the principles of universal design: -thermal modernization and repair of the ZZSO; New construction of a civil defense structure and anti-radiation shelter on the territory of Bratsk Lyceum No. 2 of the Bratsk settlement council of the Voznesensky district of the Mykolaiv region, at the address: Mykolaiv region, Voznesensky district, Bratsk settlement, Zhivkovycha street, house 17

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
Number of places provided by the SZH
0 human
250 human

Demand for the service and its dynamics

Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
250 places
Economic justification

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

New construction of a civil defense structure - an anti-radiation shelter on the territory of Bratsk Lyceum No. 2 of the Bratsk Village Council, Voznesensky District, Mykolaiv Region

Technical Solution 2

Carrying out repair work on the simplest existing shelter

Total costs70'524'038 UAH6'000'000 UAH
  • For preparation
  • 1'582'643 UAH500'000 UAH
  • For implementation
  • 65'941'395 UAH5'000'000 UAH
  • For operation
  • 3'000'000 UAH500'000 UAH
    Average annual costs3'000'000 UAH500'000 UAH
    Project duration, incl.8 months4 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
  • 1 month1 month
  • Implementation period
  • 7 months3 months
    Service life1200 months36 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active
    Rejected
    Components of a technical solution
    To components
    1
    To components
    0

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget70'524'038 UAH6'000'000 UAH
    Capital costs70'524'038 UAH6'000'000 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation1'582'643 UAH500'000 UAH
    For implementation65'941'395 UAH5'000'000 UAH
    For operation3'000'000 UAH500'000 UAH
    For closing0 UAH0 UAH

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service UnitУкриття
    Service Unit Cost263'766 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?

    ResponseNoNo

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Funding Sources

    Approved Funds1'582'643 UAH0 UAH
    Expected Funds1'582'643 UAH0 UAH
    Management Rationale

    Risk assessment

    Economic riskDefinedUndefined

    Organizational events

    ResponseDefinedUndefined
    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Economic Analysis
    Social benefits and costs
    ensuring the safety and preservation of the life and health of students, teaching staff and lyceum staff during air raids and emergencies; creating safe conditions for a continuous educational process, in particular the possibility of full-time education; increasing the level of protection of children and youth, which has a positive effect on the psychological state of students and parents; ensuring equal access to education for all students, including children with disabilities and other low-mobility population groups; the possibility of using shelter by residents of the surrounding area in case of emergencies, which increases the overall level of community security; strengthening the community's trust in local government bodies and educational institutions; increasing the resilience of the community's educational infrastructure in conditions of military threats.
    Environmental benefits and costs
    reducing the negative impact on the environment through energy-efficient solutions (thermal insulation, energy-saving lighting, ventilation systems with low energy consumption)
    Indirect benefits and costs
    reducing the risks of interruption of the educational process and related socio-economic losses