Construction of a building with an upgrade of a gas-piston cogeneration unit (reserve power source) with a capacity of more than 1 MW on the territory of the boiler house of the Chornomorskteploenergo utility company of the Black Sea City Council of the Odesa district of the Odesa region at the address: Odesa region, Odesa district, Chornomorsk city, str. Sadova, 1


Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
RENOVATION, development and modernization of district heating infrastructure, including the introduction of alternative energy sources
Project Status
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Investment Feasibility Study
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

Gas piston cogeneration plant (backup power source), based on the operation of two Jenbacher JMS 312 GS-N.L cogeneration gas piston plants with an electric capacity of 638 kW and a thermal capacity of 377 kW each.
It is designed to meet the needs of the central gas generator plant "Chornomorskteploenergo" and operates in the cogeneration mode: the generation of electrical energy occurs together with the generation of thermal energy, which, performing the function of cooling the gas piston engine, is simultaneously directed to heating the coolant in the heating network. Under the assistance program of international organizations, the city received 2 Jenbacher JMS 312 GS-N.L. plants in the amount of 2 pcs.

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Поява нових виробничих потужностей

Secondary goal:

Capacity building

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

Providing the boiler house with an alternative source of electricity supply and reliability and efficiency of heat supply of the city infrastructure of Chornomorsk. The gas-piston cogeneration plant (backup power source) being designed is based on the operation of two Jenbacher JMS 312 GS-N.L cogeneration gas-piston plants with an electric capacity of 638 kW and a thermal capacity of 377 kW each. The plant is designed to meet the needs of the central gas-generating KP "Chornomorskteploenergo" and operates in cogeneration mode: the generation of electrical energy occurs together with the generation of thermal energy, which, performing the function of cooling the gas-piston engine, is simultaneously directed to heating the coolant in the heating network. The system under consideration is provided for two operating modes: - the so-called "island" mode, when the plant operates separately from the heating network, generating electricity only for the needs of the gas-generating plant; - parallel operation mode with the power grid. In this mode, the power plant mainly works to meet its own needs of the gas generator, and peak surges in electricity consumption of the gas generator (starting currents) are compensated by the external power grid. This mode allows for more uniform operation of the power generating equipment, which ensures its uniform wear. The total heat load in the gas generator is 1434 kW, an additionally installed economizer increases the total thermal power indicator to 717 kW for each unit; Type of fuel - natural gas. Circulation of the coolant through the cogenerators is forced, by a circulation pump. To protect the cogenerator from excess pressure, spring safety valves and individual volume compensators are designed. The cogenerators are individually protected from high return coolant temperature by dry cooling towers located on the roof of the building. To compensate for the thermal expansion of the coolant in cogenerators, it is planned to install a Dan-Wates membrane expansion tank with a volume of: 500 l on the "active" circuit; 100 l on the "passive" circuit, in accordance with the schematic diagram. Flue gases from each machine individually pass through a flue gas silencer, reducing the noise pressure in the room. Next, the flue gases enter the economizer, after which two horizontal Dn250/320 chimneys, which are located one above the other vertically, exit the machine room. At a distance of 7 meters from the machine room, there is a common Dn500/560 chimney, 25 m high, where flue gases are discharged into the atmosphere. The cogenerator uses pumping equipment manufactured by Wilo.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

In the context of martial law, damage to energy infrastructure, and electricity shortages, the risk of prolonged outages has increased significantly. Heat supply facilities are critical infrastructure and must operate continuously.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Capacity

1.2 MW

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Municipal infrastructure and services

Subsector

District Heating

Stream

RENOVATION, development and modernization of district heating infrastructure, including the introduction of alternative energy sources

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

2.1.2 Develop alternative and renewable energy sources to increase the community's energy independence.

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
power
0 kW
1276 kW

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

При оцінці попиту в межах проєкту будівництва будівлі з улаштуванням газопоршневої когенераційної установки (понад 1 МВт) для КП «Чорноморськтеплоенерго» застосовувалася комбінована методологія, що поєднує аналіз фактичних даних, прогнозні розрахунки ТЕО та експертну оцінку.

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

No

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

No
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
1276 kW
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Реалізація проєкту відповідає принципам запобігання та контролю забруднення, оскільки: застосовуються сучасні екологічно безпечні технології; мінімізується негативний вплив на атмосферне повітря, ґрунти та водні ресурси; забезпечується постійний контроль і дотримання природоохоронних норм. Проєкт не створює суттєвих екологічних ризиків та сприяє більш чистому й ефективному виробництву енергії.

Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Реалізація проєкту відповідає принципам запобігання та контролю забруднення, оскільки: застосовуються сучасні екологічно безпечні технології; мінімізується негативний вплив на атмосферне повітря, ґрунти та водні ресурси; забезпечується постійний контроль і дотримання природоохоронних норм. Проєкт не створює суттєвих екологічних ризиків та сприяє більш чистому й ефективному виробництву енергії.

Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

The project may result in the forced displacement of women, men and other gender groups or loss of access to resources
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Other gender risks
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
There are risks of impaired mobility or safety for women, men and other gender groups during construction/operation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
There is a risk of reduced economic opportunities for women, men and other gender groups (e.g. loss of jobs or retail outlets)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Other benefits from project implementation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Envisaged training or advanced training for women in the private sector
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Construction of a building with the installation of a gas-piston cogeneration plant

Technical Solution 2

Alternative solution

Total costs72'193'907 UAH0 UAH
  • For preparation
  • 1'850'012 UAH0
  • For implementation
  • 69'209'895 UAH0
  • For operation
  • 1'000'000 UAH0
  • For closing
  • 134'000 UAH0
    Average annual costs1'000'000 UAH0 UAH
    Project duration, incl.10 months0 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
  • 4 months0 months
  • Implementation period
  • 6 months0 months
    Service life600 months0 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Not defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active

    [The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Pending

    [The project initiator has not taken any decision about this alternative technical approach.]

    Commercial Justification

    Supplier and contractor market assessment

    Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
    Yes, both national and international

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget72'193'907 UAH0 UAH
    Capital costs72'193'907 UAH0 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation1'850'012 UAH0 UAH
    For implementation69'209'895 UAH0 UAH
    For operation1'000'000 UAH0 UAH
    For closing134'000 UAH0 UAH
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service Unit1
    Service Unit Cost71'059'907 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?

    ResponseNoNo

    Availability of services

    Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
    No – analysis not performed

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Public-private partnership

    Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
    No, no assessment was conducted.

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

    Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?

    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    МОМ

    Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?

    Development of a full feasibility study;
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Development of design and estimate documentation (DED);
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of the feasibility study
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Other
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Need for financing

    Does the project require additional funding for preparation?

    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]