Major repairs of the adjacent territory of a residential building with landscaping at the address: Zhytomyr, Vitruka St., 42/7
Sector
Housing
Stream
Ensuring repairs to residential infrastructure facilities
Maturity level
85
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
The area adjacent to the building, which is subject to major repairs, is residential, located along a multi-storey building with 7 entrances. The condition of the asphalt concrete pavement is unsatisfactory due to the expiration of the service life of the road surface. The parameters of the roadway and sidewalks do not meet modern requirements. The lack of tactile tiles on the pedestrian part and ramps at the entrances to the building's entrances creates a danger to the movement of people with reduced mobility. The facility is located on the barrier-free route "Traffic without barriers".
The purpose of the project
Main Goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards
Secondary Goal:
Improving the condition of infrastructure
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
Major repairs to the roadway will improve traffic conditions. Resurfacing the pedestrian zone, installing tactile tiles, and equipping entrances with ramps will improve the mobility of residents, especially those with limited mobility.
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
Existing defects in the coverage of the adjacent territory and the absence of tactile tiles in the pedestrian zone can lead to accidents during the movement of vehicles and pedestrians. Carrying out major repairs will increase the comfort and safety of the movement of vehicles and pedestrians, including people with special needs, and will also improve the appearance of our city.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Number of people who will use the service
1 thous. people
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Housing
Subsector
Housing Solutions
Stream
Ensuring repairs to residential infrastructure facilities
Strategic document
Регіональна стратегія розвитку
Task
2.2.1. and 3.3.4. Improving the quality of the housing stock: reconstruction of old buildings, provision of affordable housing for the population; Creation of a barrier-free environment for all population groups in regions and territorial communities in all areas of barrier-free living.
Project objectives
Indicator
Base value
Target value
Area of repaired road surface of adjacent and intra-block areas during the year
0 km2
2.8 km2
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
Install ramps near the entrances of buildings for unhindered movement of people with limited mobility
Technical Solution 2
Do not install ramps near the entrances of buildings for the unhindered movement of people with limited mobility.
Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)5'338'723 UAH5'338'723 UAH
For preparation305'426 UAH305'426 UAH
For implementation5'033'297 UAH5'033'297 UAH
Project operation and closure cost141'000 UAH141'000 UAH
For operation1'000 UAH1'000 UAH
For closing140'000 UAH140'000 UAH
Average annual costs2'739'862 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.25 months36 months
Deadline for developing a FFS1 month12 months
Implementation period24 months24 months
Service life120 months120 months
Target indicatorsDefined Not defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Pending
[The project initiator has not taken any decision about this alternative technical approach.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget5'479'723 UAH5'479'723 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)5'338'723 UAH5'338'723 UAH
For preparation305'426 UAH305'426 UAH
For implementation5'033'297 UAH5'033'297 UAH
Project operation and closure cost141'000 UAH141'000 UAH
For operation1'000 UAH1'000 UAH
For closing140'000 UAH140'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service Unitкв.км
Service Unit Cost15'460 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management Rationale
Team competencies
Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
None of the options are applicable
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
No, I need help.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Risk assessment
Technical riskDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
23/12/2025SP-L-231225-A7096DF1Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
29/12/2025SPP-L-291225-D8D79CA3Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-85