Reconstruction of part of the basement of the Zelenivka Nursery School No. 47 building of the Kherson City Council for the construction of a civil defense facility with the properties of a PRU at the address: Kherson region, Kherson city territorial community, Zelenivka village, Bohdana Khmelnytskyi st., 5

Sector
Education and science
Stream
Arrangement of civil defense structures (shelters) in preschool educational institutions.
Project Status
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Investment Feasibility Study
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project provides for the reconstruction of part of the basement of the building to arrange an anti-radiation shelter (dual-purpose structure) with a total area of 893.70 sq. m (before reconstruction - 960.50 sq. m), in which conditions are created for the stay of 216 children and educators of a preschool educational institution. The dual purpose will allow the use of the PRU as a safe educational space for children and a shelter for them and residents of the village in case of danger to life and health. The protective structure is equipped with measures to ensure access and stay of low-mobility groups of the population. Spatial planning and constructive solutions, special and other engineering equipment, systems and life support means of the protective structure will comply with building codes and regulatory legal acts, and will provide  barrier-free adapted environment for children with special educational needs. The radiation shelter will be equipped and equipped with the necessary furniture and equipment. For the implementation of the project, design and estimate documentation has been developed and a positive expert report EX01:4475-6052-7511-6606 has been received. 

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Creation of new facilities and services

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

Increase the stock of protective structures with the properties of PRU in preschool educational institutions by reconstructing part of the basements, increase the number of children for whom safe conditions will be created in the educational institution (216 places); long-term inclusive use of a dual-purpose protective structure during emergencies to preserve the life and health of the village residents and use it to expand the educational process in peacetime. All this will additionally contribute to the return of families with children to the city.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

Problem: Difficult security situation: risks to life and health. Solution: The construction of a protective structure (PRU) for 216 people will allow to protect participants in the educational process and local residents in case of danger, the level of protection is much higher than the usual simplest shelters. Problem: Availability of only distance learning. Solution: The dual purpose of the structure will allow to safely carry out the educational process in an offline format, reduce the risks of educational losses, improve the conditions for receiving high-quality safe educational services and organized leisure for students in peacetime. Additionally, the project will influence the creation of favorable conditions for families with children, the return of residents to the city.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of people who will use the service

216 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Education and science

Subsector

Preschool education

Stream

Arrangement of civil defense structures (shelters) in preschool educational institutions.

Strategic document

State Strategy for Regional Development for 2021–2027

Task

Strategic goal 2 operational goal 1 task 21 Promoting the increase in the stock of civil defense protective structures, taking into account the principles of inclusiveness and accessibility

Project objectives

Project objectives were not specified by the initiator

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Assessment of the number of ready-made shelters in educational institutions, the number of school-age children, and the general demographic situation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
216 places
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?

No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?

Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?

No consultations were held with target groups.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?

None of the options are applicable

Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?

Not provided for by the project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Expert report kindergarten 47.pdf
25.12.2025
04:10:58 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Arrangement of PRU for ZDO 47 by reconstruction

Technical Solution 2

Modular shelter for ZDO 47

Total costs67'639'984 UAH19'728'000 UAH
  • For preparation
    • 0 UAH100'000 UAH
  • For implementation
    • 67'639'984 UAH19'200'000 UAH
  • For operation
    • 0 UAH420'000 UAH
  • For closing
    • 0 UAH8'000 UAH
    Average annual costs420'000 UAH620'000 UAH
    Project duration, incl.10 months8 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
    • 1 month4 months
  • Implementation period
    • 9 months4 months
    Service life360 months600 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active

    [The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Rejected

    [The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Commercial Justification

    Supplier and contractor market assessment

    Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
    Yes, only national

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
    Обрано стратегію проведення конкурентних закупівель для залучення кваліфікованої підрядної організації, що має досвід будівництва захисних споруд цивільного захисту. Доцільність стратегії обґрунтована пріоритетністю створення безпечних умов для населення в умовах воєнного стану. Враховуючи складність об'єкта (реконструкція), стратегія базується на детальному аналізі ринку будівельних послуг, що дозволяє забезпечити дотримання державних будівельних норм (ДБН) та отримати найбільш економічно вигідну пропозицію.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
    Для забезпечення прозорості та ефективності будівництва планується: * Використання електронної системи ProZorro для проведення торгів та публікації всієї звітності. * Оприлюднення детальної проєктно-кошторисної документації та чітких вимог до технічних характеристик матеріалів. * Встановлення суворих кваліфікаційних критеріїв щодо наявності техніки, працівників відповідної кваліфікації та досвіду виконання аналогічних договорів. * Забезпечення незалежного технічного та авторського нагляду за ходом реконструкції для контролю якості робіт та цільового використання коштів.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
    Open competitive bidding

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Pre-market engagement
    Попереднє залучення ринку здійснювалося шляхом аналізу відкритих даних у системі Prozorro щодо аналогічних проєктів улаштування укриттів у регіоні. Вже розроблена та затверджена проєктно-кошторисна документація. Можливе коригування термінів виконання робіт з урахуванням логістичних та безпекових особливостей прифронтової зони.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Potential market participants
    Рівень конкуренції оцінюється як низький, оскільки незважаючи на те, що на ринку присутня достатня кількість підрядних організацій, здатних виконувати роботи за державними будівельними нормами В.2.2-5-97 (Захисні споруди цивільного захисту), розташування у зоні активних бойових дій обмежує кількість потенційних виконавців.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Market readiness assessment
    Ринок готовий до реалізації проєкту. В наявності є необхідні технології для швидкого улаштування укриттів, а також доступ до будівельних ресурсів. Основними регуляторними бар’єрами можуть бути посилені вимоги до безпеки праці в зоні бойових дій.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget67'639'984 UAH19'728'000 UAH
    Capital costs67'639'984 UAH19'728'000 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation0 UAH100'000 UAH
    For implementation67'639'984 UAH19'200'000 UAH
    For operation0 UAH420'000 UAH
    For closing0 UAH8'000 UAH
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service UnitУлаштування ПРУ у ЗДО 47 (реконструкція)
    Service Unit Cost68'289'860 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?

    ResponseNoNo

    Availability of services

    Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
    Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Public-private partnership

    Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
    The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management Rationale

    Team competencies

    Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
    Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - economic analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - communication with stakeholders

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - risk management

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - social and gender analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - public consultations

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of available procurement options

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - legal support

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial analysis - financial analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - demand analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of the market environment

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
    Partially, we have limited experience

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
    Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
    Partially, we are considering options

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
    Environmental experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Technical experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Risk assessment

    Other riskDefinedUndefined

    Organizational events

    ResponseDefinedUndefined
    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

    Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?

    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?

    None of the options are applicable

    Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

    None of the options are applicable
    Need for financing

    Does the project require additional funding for preparation?

    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Approval History

    DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasons
    25/12/2025SP-L-251225-6BF280EACommunity SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-
    26/12/2025SPP-L-261225-DFE0E789Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-