"Reconstruction of the water supply system in the village of Rzhavchyk, Lozov district, Kharkiv region" Code DK 45454000-4 Reconstruction"


Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Reconstruction of the water supply system in the village of Rzhavchyk, Lozov district, Kharkiv region» Code DK 45454000-4 Reconstruction
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

When performing the work on the reconstruction of the water supply system, it is planned to: - reconstruction of the water supply system in the village of Rzhavchyk, Lozovsky district, Kharkiv region. Pipeline material - PE100 SDR17 ⌀110x6.6 mm, length 12122.3 m; - installation of a puncture for a/d by horizontal drilling from a PE-100 SDR26 pipe O280x10.7 mm - 86 m (8 pcs.); - installation of a culvert for crossing a swampy area by horizontal drilling from a PE-100 SDR26 pipe O280x10.7 mm - 891.4 m (3x2 pcs.); - laying of a casing by open method from PE-100 SDR26 pipes O280x10.7 mm at the places of crossing the highway and intersection of the designed network with a gas pipeline - 517 m (89 pcs.);-reconstruction of the water pipeline is carried out without stopping the operation of the existing water pipeline with the laying of a new one (at a depth of at least 1.5 m) above the existing one or next to the existing pipeline without dismantling it.;-installation of water wells with a diameter of 1500 mm - 20 pcs., 1000 mm - 5 pieces, namely: Type I, the project provides for a 1500 mm well with a 100 mm valve and a driven hydrant; Type II, VII, the project provides for a 1500 mm well with two valves on the branch of 100 mm and a driven hydrant; Type III, the project provides for a 1500 mm well with two valves on the branch of 100 mm; Type IV, the project provides for a 1500 mm well with a 100 mm valve and a 100 mm air plunger; Type V, the project provides for a 1500 mm well with a 100 mm valve for emptying the network; Type VI, the project provides for a 1000 mm well for receiving water from emptying the network; - the project provides for the installation of concrete stops in the wells for the valves with the arrangement of necks and complete internal waterproofing of walls (type VI), external waterproofing of walls (type I - type VII); As a result of the reconstruction of water supply networks, the quality indicators of water supply to consumers will be improved and the following results will be obtained: - minimizing the frequency of pipeline damage and accidents; - reducing energy loss and energy resources due to the installation of new equipment; - providing the consumer with uninterrupted and high-quality water supply services

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards

Secondary goal:

Contribution to climate or environmental goals, Increasing compliance with modern standards, Improving the equality of wealth distribution, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Introducing innovations and energy-efficient solutions, Meeting demand

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The purpose of the water supply reconstruction project in the village of Rzhavchyk is to: 1.1. Ensure reliable, uninterrupted and high-quality water supply to the population The project is positioned as socio-ecological and aimed at improving the quality of water supply services through the modernization of worn-out infrastructure 1.2. Increase the energy efficiency of the water supply system Existing networks are characterized by high energy consumption, so the reconstruction involves replacing them with modern PE100 polyethylene pipes, which significantly reduces resistance and energy consumption for water transportation 1.3. Reduce the accident rate and water losses The reconstruction is aimed at minimizing the frequency of damage, eliminating losses and increasing the reliability of the network 1.4. Implementation of modern and energy-saving technologies The project involves the use of the horizontal directional drilling (HDD) method, new polyethylene pipes and energy-saving equipment WAYS TO ACHIEVE THE GOAL DURING THE PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION Based on the project documentation: 2.1. Complete replacement of worn-out pipelines • new PE100 SDR17 Ø110 mm pipes with a total length of over 12 km (12122.3 m) 2.2. Arrangement of crossings using modern trenchless technologies • HDD drilling under swampy areas (3×2 strings, 891.4 m) • punctures under highways (8 pcs., 86 m) 2.3. Construction of new wells and shut-off valves • wells with a diameter of 1500 mm — 20 pcs. • 1000 mm wells — 5 pcs. • installation of valves, hydrants, ventilation elements 2.4. Network protection at intersections with other communications Installation of PE100 protective casings Ø280 mm in the most critical areas (517 m) 2.5. Use of energy-saving solutions The project emphasizes reducing specific electricity consumption due to new pipes and equipment, reducing hydraulic losses 2.6. Ensuring environmental safety • preservation of the microrelief of the territory • absence of negative impact on the environment 3. JUSTIFICATION OF THE GAP BETWEEN THE CURRENT STATE AND THE TARGET LEVEL Based on the analysis of the project documentation, the gap is significant and includes the following components: 3.1. Technical gap Current state: • the network is in unsatisfactory technical condition (wear, defects, damage) • high accident rates • existing areas in marshy areas with accident risks • the network does not meet modern standards for tightness, strength and operational safety Target state: • new pipeline made of PE100 polyethylene pipes • increased service life (>50 years) • minimization of accidents and damage • standardized fittings and new wells 3.2. Operational and energy gap Current state: • high energy costs for transporting water through outdated pipes and uneven hydraulic loads • water losses due to leaks in pipes and connections Target state: • reduction of specific electricity consumption • improvement of the hydraulic regime • reduction of water losses to the regulatory level • energy-efficient system with modern materials 3.3. Infrastructure and safety gap Current state: • lack of a sufficient number of working wells • systems do not provide full capabilities for operational regulation, shutdown, fire extinguishing • intersections with roads and gas pipelines are not properly protected Target level: • availability of new wells with fittings • installation of fire hydrants • protective cases at intersections with other networks 3.4. Socio-ecological gap Current status: • instability of water supply • possibility of water pollution due to accidents • periodic interruptions and complaints from the population Target level: • stable, uninterrupted and high-quality water supply • ecological safety of the system • reduction of the risk of accidents and flooding

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

KEY PROBLEMS TO BE SOLVED BY THE PROJECT 1. High degree of wear and tear and failure rate of the water supply network The essence of the problem The existing network is in unsatisfactory technical condition, which is manifested in: • frequent damage to pipes; • destruction of wells; • subsidence of soil; • pressure drop and interruptions in water supply. The documentation directly states: The water supply networks in the village of Rzhavchyk are characterized by unsatisfactory technical condition and require reconstruction There may be pipeline breaks, destroyed wells, subsidence of soil, etc. The relevance of the problem now • physical wear exceeds permissible norms; • the failure rate only increases every year; • the community needs a stable water supply, especially in conditions of increased load on the infrastructure. Consequences of inaction • increase in accidents and interruptions in water supply; • threat of flooding and destruction in the area of network passage; • deterioration of sanitary and hygienic conditions; • risks to public health. Positive changes after project implementation • minimization of accidents and pipe damage; • stable network operation; • increased reliability of water supply for the entire community. 2. Excessive water losses and low energy efficiency of the system The essence of the problem Outdated pipelines have high hydraulic resistance and leaks, which leads to: • significant water losses; • increased energy consumption to maintain pressure; • inefficient operation of pumping equipment. The documentation states: The network has high energy consumption, which requires reconstruction and replacement of pipelines with modern PE100. Reconstruction will reduce the specific electricity costs for water supply Current relevance of the problem • rapid growth in electricity tariffs; • limited financial resources of the utility; • constant increase in water losses due to aging networks. Consequences of inaction • further growth in water supply costs; • increase in tariffs for the population; • decrease in system efficiency and unprofitability of the enterprise. Positive changes after project implementation • reduction in water losses; • electricity savings; • reduction in operating costs; • increase in financial stability of the network operator. 3. Insufficient hydraulic and technical reliability of the network The essence of the problem The current system does not meet the standards for safe and high-quality operation, there is a lack of: • serviceable wells; • modern shut-off valves; • a sufficient number of fire hydrants; • protective cases at the intersections of other communications. In the documentation: It is necessary to restore destroyed wells, replace covers, eliminate subsidence and restore system equipment elements. The project includes the installation of new wells, valves, hydrants and protective cases - that is, infrastructure that is currently lacking for stable operation. Current relevance • non-compliance with the current State Building Code; • increased safety requirements for vulnerable infrastructure; • the need to ensure fire safety in the settlement. Consequences of inaction • inability to quickly localize accidents; • lack of guaranteed fire water supply; • increased risk of large-scale accidents. Positive changes after project implementation • compliance of the network with modern standards; • increased controllability and safety of the system; • the possibility of quickly shutting off water in case of accidents. 4. Social and environmental risks The essence of the problem Damage to the network and pipe bursts create: • risks of flooding of territories; • the risk of pollutants entering the system; • negative social and household consequences for residents. The documentation states: The facility in its current state may create a negative impact on the environment, in particular due to accidents and violations of the tightness of pipelines. Current relevance • increased requirements for sanitary safety; • risks of environmental pollution with water; • worsening of climatic conditions affecting soils and networks. Consequences of inaction • environmental incidents; • deterioration of water quality; • threat to public health. Positive changes after project implementation • elimination of pollution risks; • increased level of environmental safety; • stable and safe conditions for residents. GENERAL CONCLUSION The implementation of the project will allow solving a complex of critical problems that have accumulated over decades: • failure rate and physical wear of networks; • excessive energy and water consumption; • non-compliance of infrastructure with modern requirements; • risks to the population and the environment. If the project is not implemented, the infrastructure will continue to degrade, increasing the risks of accidents, water supply failures and financial losses. After the project is implemented, the community will receive a modern, energy-saving, reliable and safe water supply system that will comply with current state standards and ensure stable quality of services.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of people who will use the service

808 human

Population in the geographical area of influence of the project

600 human

Number of IDPs in the geographical area of impact of the project

169 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Municipal infrastructure and services

Subsector

Development and Reconstruction of Subnational Infrastructure

Stream

Reconstruction of the water supply system in the village of Rzhavchyk, Lozov district, Kharkiv region» Code DK 45454000-4 Reconstruction

Strategic document

Task

2.2.1 Ensure proper functioning and modernization of municipal institutions and civil and critical infrastructure facilities

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value

Demand for the service and its dynamics

Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
23
540 human
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
24
560 human
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
25
600 human
Economic justification

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Reconstruction of the water supply system in the village of Rzhavchyk, Lozov district, Kharkiv region» Code DK 45454000-4 Reconstruction

Technical Solution 2

"Overhaul of the water supply system in the village of Rzhavchyk, Lozov district, Kharkiv region"

Total costs32'194'889 UAH32'400'000 UAH
  • For preparation
  • 371'766 UAH400'000 UAH
  • For implementation
  • 31'823'123 UAH32'000'000 UAH
    Average annual costs60'000 UAH150'000 UAH
    Project duration, incl.8 months6 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
  • 3 months2 months
  • Implementation period
  • 5 months4 months
    Service life600 months240 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active
    Rejected
    Components of a technical solution
    To components
    1
    To components
    0

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget32'194'889 UAH32'400'000 UAH
    Capital costs32'194'889 UAH32'400'000 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation371'766 UAH400'000 UAH
    For implementation31'823'123 UAH32'000'000 UAH
    For operation0 UAH0 UAH
    For closing0 UAH0 UAH

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service UnitВартість одиниці послуги
    Service Unit Cost53'686 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?

    ResponseNoNo

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Funding Sources

    Approved Funds31'694'889 UAH0 UAH
    Expected Funds32'194'889 UAH0 UAH
    Management Rationale

    Risk assessment

    Technical riskDefinedUndefined
    Financial riskDefinedUndefined
    Economic riskDefinedUndefined
    Social riskDefinedUndefined
    Market riskDefinedUndefined
    Environmental riskDefinedUndefined
    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Economic Analysis
    Social benefits and costs
    The implementation of the project provides a significant social effect, as it is aimed at improving the quality of life of the population and increasing the availability of basic services. Ensuring stable and reliable access to infrastructure services will contribute to increasing the level of well-being of the population, reducing social vulnerability and risks associated with disruptions or poor quality of existing infrastructure. The main social benefits include: improving the level of living comfort for all population groups, including socially vulnerable ones; reducing the number of complaints and social tension associated with insufficient quality of services; increasing the safety and reliability of service provision, which is especially important for children, the elderly and people with chronic diseases; improving sanitation conditions, which has a positive impact on public health. Social costs are mainly associated with temporary inconveniences during project implementation, such as restricted access to certain facilities, temporary technical interruptions, noise or a short-term increase in the load on local resources. These costs are short-term, predictable, and significantly less than the expected long-term social impact.
    Environmental benefits and costs
    The project has a positive impact on the environment, as it contributes to increasing the efficiency of resource use, reducing technical losses, as well as improving the ecological safety of the territory. Expected environmental benefits include: reducing resource losses (water, energy, materials) due to infrastructure modernization; reducing the risk of accidents, leaks, pollution and negative impacts on soil, groundwater and ecosystems; reducing the burden on natural resources due to increasing the efficiency of their use; increasing the level of ecological safety of the community in accordance with current national standards. Environmental costs include possible short-term impacts during the implementation of construction works: local disturbance of the soil cover, generation of construction waste, noise and increased transport load. These impacts are temporary, controllable and eliminated after the completion of the construction phase.
    Indirect benefits and costs
    Indirect benefits of the project are manifested in the long term and are associated with economic development, increased investment attractiveness of the territory and strengthening of local infrastructure. Among the main indirect effects: increased real estate value and investment attractiveness of the territory; improved conditions for the development of small business, entrepreneurship and private investment; increased employment during the implementation and operation of the project; reduced long-term costs of the community and budget authorities for emergency repair measures and maintenance of worn-out infrastructure; increased tax revenues due to increased economic activity. Indirect costs may include the risk of increased need for related infrastructure investments in the medium term (expansion of networks, modernization of adjacent systems), but they are predictable and are usually planned for separate stages of development of the community's infrastructure.