Barrier-free routes of the Buchanan urban territorial community


Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Creation of barrier-free routes in populated areas
Maturity level
81
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project provides for a pedestrian zone with traffic restrictions (except for service vehicles) on the section of Energetikov Street from Polyova Street to Heroiv Maidanu Street with the arrangement of transport services for the surrounding neighborhoods from the surrounding streets.

The project provides for a pedestrian zone with traffic restrictions (except for service vehicles) on the section of Energetikov Street from Polyova Street to Heroiv Maidanu Street.

The general plan solutions are aimed at comprehensively arranging the street as a local highway with priority for the safety of pedestrians and users with reduced mobility and increasing the throughput capacity of intersections.

It is provided for:

The project passages are made in red lines, with a link to the existing street and road network and nodes on B. Khmelnytsky Boulevard and Zahisnykov Ukrainy Street; at intersections - raised pedestrian crossings and safety islands. Barrier-free elements have been installed (lowering the curb at crossing points, tactile strips, allocated parking spaces for motor vehicles), a bike path as part of the cross-section of the street; lawns and other green landscaping elements.

In areas with different reliefs, retaining walls are used with the arrangement of foundations and backfill according to the specification.

The adopted technical solutions meet traffic safety requirements, including a list of traffic management tools (road signs, markings, fences/guides).

The planning solutions of the general plan are coordinated with the existing engineering infrastructure and provide for its preservation, protection or local rearrangement in places of conflict with the design elements (roadways, sidewalks, retaining walls, traffic management, parking spaces for MGN, bicycle infrastructure, landscaping). 

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Ensuring inclusiveness and equal opportunities

Secondary goal:

Improving the equality of wealth distribution, Improving the condition of infrastructure

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The main goal of the project is to create a barrier-free, safe and comfortable route within the city of Bucha, in particular, Energetikiv, Zhakisnyky Ukrainy, Heroiv Maidanu, Polyova and Bohdan Khmelnytskyi streets, which will ensure inclusivity and equality of opportunities for all residents of the community, regardless of age, physical abilities or social status. The project is aimed at implementing the principles of universal design and barrier-free urban environment, which involves creating conditions for free, safe and independent movement of pedestrians, in particular low-mobility groups of the population: • people with disabilities; • elderly people; • parents with strollers; • young children; • temporarily low-mobility people (after injuries, pregnant women, etc.). An additional goal is to improve the technical condition of urban infrastructure, modernize sidewalks, intersections and pedestrian crossings in accordance with modern standards of safety, energy efficiency and aesthetics of urban space. Method of achieving the goal The achievement of the set goals is envisaged through a comprehensive overhaul and improvement of the street and road network and pedestrian zones within the specified limits, in compliance with the principles of accessibility and safety. Technical measures 1. Carrying out overhaul of intersections (Polyova St. - Energetikov; Zahisnykov Ukrainy St. - Energetikov; Bohdana Khmelnytsky St. - Energetikov) with the arrangement of: o lowered curbs for unhindered passage of wheeled vehicles; o tactile elements for people with visual impairments; o modern lighting and drainage; o new road markings, including contrasting ones for the visually impaired. 2. Reconstruction of sidewalks and pedestrian paths on Energetikov St. and Bohdana Khmelnytsky St.: o replacement of the coating with non-slip, even and durable; o widening of sidewalks for convenient movement of pedestrians and wheelchairs; o arrangement of places for rest with benches, urns, green spaces; o ensuring the continuity of the pedestrian route without barriers. 3. Major repairs of above-ground pedestrian crossings taking into account the DBN safety standards: o arrangement of tactile tiles; o installation of anti-vandal ramps; o updating lighting for visibility in the dark; o installation of lowered ramps and guiding curbs. 4. Improvement of Kyiv Square (within Heroiv Maidanu and Energetikiv streets): o creation of a comfortable public space with barrier-free access; o arrangement of short-term rest areas; o improvement of landscaping, installation of small architectural forms. Organizational activities • Conducting a technical inspection of the condition of existing coatings and barrier elements. • Development of design and estimate documentation taking into account inclusive standards (DBN V.2.3-5:2018, DBN V.2.2-40:2018, DSTU ISO 21542:2013). • Coordination of design solutions with accessibility specialists and representatives of low-mobility groups. • Ensuring quality control of the work performed at each stage of implementation. Expected results of achieving the goal • Creation of a single barrier-free route 930 m long, which will connect key streets of the central part of the city. • Increasing the accessibility of public service facilities (educational, administrative, cultural, medical). • Reducing the level of pedestrian injuries, especially among low-mobility groups. • Improving the aesthetic appearance of the urban space and increasing the tourist attractiveness of Bucha. • Formation of a two-level public service system - combining the city-wide center with everyday objects in residential areas. Contribution to community development The implementation of the project will be an important stage in creating an inclusive and comfortable urban infrastructure that meets modern European standards. The project will contribute to: • improving the quality of life of residents; • creating a positive image of Bucha as a city friendly to people; • integrating the principles of barrier-free living into further planning of the urban environment.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

As a result, the implementation of the project should solve the following key problems 1. Insufficient inclusiveness of urban space Today, within the streets of Energetykiv, Zhakisnyky Ukrainy, Heroiv Maidanu, Polyova and Bohdan Khmelnytskyi, there are significant barriers to the movement of people with disabilities, the elderly, parents with strollers and other low-mobility population groups. The curbs are not lowered, the sidewalks are with worn or uneven surfaces, and the crossings are not equipped with tactile tiles or ramps. Such conditions make it impossible to move independently and safely around the city and contradict the principles of universal design. Relevance of the problem: After the full-scale invasion and active reconstruction of urban areas, the issue of inclusiveness has gained particular importance. The number of people with disabilities (including veterans, internally displaced persons, victims of hostilities) who need a comfortable barrier-free environment is increasing in the community. Possible consequences of failure to resolve the issue: • further isolation and social inequality of low-mobility groups; • limited access to educational, medical, and administrative services; • decreased quality of life and residents' satisfaction with the urban environment. Expected positive changes: • ensuring unhindered movement of all categories of citizens; • increasing the level of social integration and accessibility of services; • creating a comfortable space for everyday life and active participation in the community. 2. Unsatisfactory technical condition of pedestrian infrastructure Many sections of sidewalks, pedestrian crossings, and intersections are in a dilapidated condition: damaged or missing pavement, unevenness, lack of drainage, lighting, and clear markings. This creates dangerous conditions for pedestrians, especially in the evening or in adverse weather. Relevance of the problem: The growth of traffic load, active development, and increased pedestrian traffic in the central part of Bucha require modernization of the street network. The lack of quality infrastructure slows down the development of the city, reduces its tourist attractiveness and comfort of living. Possible consequences of not solving the problem: • increased risk of pedestrian injuries; • further destruction of the road surface and increased costs for emergency repairs; • reduced traffic safety at intersections and crossings. Expected positive changes: • improved condition of sidewalks and roads, increased durability; • ensuring convenient and safe movement of pedestrians; • reduced accident rate and increased overall comfort of the urban space. 3. Lack of a single barrier-free pedestrian route Currently, pedestrian paths in the specified quarter do not form a logically connected, continuous system. People are forced to overcome dangerous sections of the roadway or move along lawns and sidewalks. This reduces the attractiveness of public spaces and prevents effective pedestrian communication between important objects. Relevance of the problem: Bucha is actively developing as a modern city of the European model, and the creation of safe pedestrian routes is an integral part of the strategy for sustainable community development. Without the formation of a barrier-free network, it is impossible to ensure a comfortable urban environment and equal access to public services. Possible consequences of not solving the problem: • maintaining the fragmentation of pedestrian infrastructure; • reducing the mobility of residents and visitors to the city; • increasing the traffic load due to the reorientation of citizens to private cars. Expected positive changes: • formation of a continuous, convenient pedestrian route 895 m long; • improving the connectivity of urban spaces and access to key infrastructure facilities; • promoting the development of sustainable mobility and environmentally friendly transportation. 4. Inconsistency of existing infrastructure with modern standards of the urban environment Most of the facilities within the project do not meet modern state building codes (DBN) and requirements for accessibility, energy efficiency, lighting and landscaping. This negatively affects the overall aesthetics of the urban space and the comfort of staying in it. Relevance of the problem: The European vector of development of Ukraine provides for the implementation of standards of inclusive, sustainable and ecological urban planning. Without the modernization of key urban spaces, the community will not be able to realize its potential as a modern, comfortable and competitive city. Possible consequences of not solving the problem: • lagging behind national and European development trends; • loss of investment attractiveness of the city; • decrease in the level of satisfaction of residents with living conditions. Expected positive changes: • updating of infrastructure in accordance with modern accessibility norms and standards; • improvement of the architectural appearance of the central part of the city; • formation of a positive image of Bucha as a city comfortable for everyone. Thus, the implementation of the project will eliminate the main infrastructure, social and security problems of the central part of Bucha, creating a single, inclusive, safe and modern pedestrian space that will contribute to social equality, economic development and improvement of the quality of life of the community.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Other economic

930 m

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Municipal infrastructure and services

Subsector

Urban planning and landscaping

Stream

Creation of barrier-free routes in populated areas

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

A.1.5.13 Creating a barrier-free environment for all groups of the community, ensuring equal opportunities for each person to exercise their rights and receive services on an equal basis with others

Project objectives

Project objectives were not specified by the initiator

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Оцінка попиту на безбар’єрну інфраструктуру проводилась із застосуванням комбінованого підходу, що включав кілька методів: 1. Соціологічний метод (опитування населення) o Проведено опитування мешканців міста в межах публічних консультацій та зборів громадськості (онлайн- та офлайн-формати). o Учасники оцінювали рівень доступності міської інфраструктури, безпечність пересування та потребу у створенні безбар’єрного середовища. o Результати продемонстрували, що понад дві третини респондентів вважають облаштування безбар’єрних маршрутів одним із пріоритетних напрямів міського розвитку. 2. Аналітичний метод (аналіз містобудівної та соціальної статистики) o Використано дані демографічної статистики, кількості осіб з інвалідністю, учнівських потоків, транспортної доступності. o На основі цих показників визначено орієнтовне навантаження на пішохідну мережу та необхідну пропускну здатність об’єктів після реконструкції. 3. Порівняльний (бенчмаркінговий) метод o Аналізувалися успішні практики реалізації подібних проєктів у сусідніх громадах (м. Ірпінь, м. Вишгород, м. Бровари), які показали позитивний соціальний та економічний ефект після впровадження безбар’єрних рішень. 4. Нормативно-прогнозний метод o Враховано вимоги державних будівельних норм (ДБН В.2.3-5:2018, ДБН В.2.2-40:2018) та прогнозоване збільшення чисельності мешканців міста, що зумовлює необхідність розширення доступної інфраструктури.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
20.5 thous. people
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
2
25 thous. people
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
3
28 thous. people
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?

No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?

Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

There are risks of impaired mobility or safety for women, men and other gender groups during construction/operation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Other benefits from project implementation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?

Focus groups or consultations with women and vulnerable groups were held
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Feedback on the project design was received from organizations working with women
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Women's participation is ensured at various stages of planning (including public hearings)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?

All possible positive impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
All possible negative impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?

Mandatory training for project staff on gender equality and inclusion is provided
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Economic analysis barrier-free.docx
21.11.2025
09:26:59 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Barrier-free routes of the Buchanan urban territorial community

Technical Solution 2

Using alternative materials

Total costs242'700'001 UAH12'870'000 UAH
  • For preparation
  • 2'800'000 UAH250'000 UAH
  • For implementation
  • 238'000'000 UAH9'800'000 UAH
  • For operation
  • 1'900'000 UAH2'700'000 UAH
  • For closing
  • 1 UAH120'000 UAH
    Average annual costs2'000'000 UAH180'000 UAH
    Project duration, incl.24 months12 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
  • 6 months3 months
  • Implementation period
  • 18 months9 months
    Service life300 months180 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active

    [The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Rejected

    [The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Components of a technical solution
    To components
    4
    To components
    0

    Commercial Justification

    Supplier and contractor market assessment

    Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
    Yes, both national and international

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
    Стратегія закупівель передбачає проведення відкритих конкурентних торгів як основної процедури закупівлі для реалізації проєкту, з можливим використанням прямих переговорних процедур для специфічних послуг та робіт, які потребують висококваліфікованих підрядників або вузькоспеціалізованих матеріалів.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
    Використання ProZorro як електронної платформи для всіх публічних закупівель. Залучення незалежних спостерігачів та аудитів під час проведення конкурсів. Публічне звітування щодо всіх етапів закупівель та укладених контрактів. Контроль якості закупівель через технічні специфікації, сертифікації матеріалів та регулярний моніторинг виконання робіт.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
    Open competitive bidding

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Direct negotiation procedures

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Pre-market engagement
    Аналіз відкритих тендерів на схожі проєкти у містах України. Консультації з експертами у сфері інклюзивної інфраструктури та будівництва. Огляд рішень та пропозицій міжнародних та національних постачальників інфраструктурних рішень для безбар’єрного пересування. Прямі запити до компаній-підрядників щодо готовності виконати роботи у встановлені строки.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Potential market participants
    Національні підрядники: будівельні компанії з досвідом дорожніх та міських робіт, компанії з виготовлення пандусів та інклюзивних елементів. Міжнародні постачальники: постачальники інклюзивних матеріалів, обладнання для безбар’єрних маршрутів. Консультанти: експерти з доступності міської інфраструктури, технічні радники та аудиторські компанії для контролю якості.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Market readiness assessment
    Кваліфіковані виконавці: ринок готовий, достатня кількість компаній має досвід реалізації аналогічних проєктів. Доступність технологій / ресурсів: всі необхідні матеріали та технології доступні як на національному, так і на міжнародному ринку. Потенційні бар’єри: регуляторні (зміни у законодавстві щодо закупівель), економічні (коливання цін на матеріали), технічні (необхідність відповідності стандартам безбар’єрності). Всі бар’єри можуть бути мінімізовані шляхом належного планування та контролю закупівель.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget242'700'001 UAH12'870'000 UAH
    Capital costs242'700'001 UAH12'870'000 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation2'800'000 UAH250'000 UAH
    For implementation238'000'000 UAH9'800'000 UAH
    For operation1'900'000 UAH2'700'000 UAH
    For closing1 UAH120'000 UAH
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service Unit1 м маршруту безбар’єрного руху
    Service Unit Cost239'213 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
    Is the project self-sustaining?No

    Availability of services

    Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
    Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Funding Sources

    Approved Funds226'307'122 UAH0 UAH
    Expected Funds226'307'122 UAH0 UAH

    Public-private partnership

    Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
    The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management Rationale

    Team competencies

    Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
    Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - economic analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - communication with stakeholders

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - risk management

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - social and gender analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - public consultations

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of available procurement options

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - legal support

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial analysis - financial analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - demand analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of the market environment

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
    Partially, we have limited experience

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
    Economic justification - environmental expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management rationale - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
    Partially, we are considering options

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
    Financial consultants/modelers

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Legal consultants

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic analysts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic consultants

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Technical experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Social/gender consultants

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management experts / project managers

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Risk assessment

    Financial riskDefinedUndefined
    Other riskDefinedUndefined

    Organizational events

    ResponseDefinedUndefined
    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

    Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?

    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?

    Development of a full feasibility study;
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Development of design and estimate documentation (DED);
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of the feasibility study
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

    Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of the feasibility study
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
    Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
    Need for financing

    Does the project require additional funding for preparation?

    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Approval History

    DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
    21/11/2025SP-L-211125-DF39217DCommunity SPInvestment Feasibility StudyCanceled--
    21/11/2025SP-L-211125-BCFEDF33Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
    17/02/2026SP-N-170226-A97CD875State SPInvestment Feasibility StudyAwaiting review--
    11/12/2025SPP-L-111225-B66B2B70Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-81