New construction of an anti-radiation shelter in the Oleksandrivka Lyceum named after T.G. Shevchenko at 244 Podziguna Generala St. in the village of Oleksandrivka, Voznesensky district, Mykolaiv region. Correction

Sector
Education and science
Stream
Ensuring the safety of participants in the educational process by creating or modernizing the protective infrastructure of general secondary education institutions
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The new construction of the PRU is safety for students and teaching staff, designed for 360 people. The premises are provided with engineering systems of heating, ventilation, water supply, sewage, electric lighting, which contribute to the normal functioning of the PRU, create an appropriate microclimate and ensure compliance with sanitary and hygienic standards. Since there are no civil defense facilities within a radius of 500 meters from the lyceum that are ready for shelter, 599 students study at the lyceum and today the simplest shelter of the lyceum can accommodate 190 people from all students. The shelter provides for the possible further construction of a section to increase the number of those sheltered.

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Creation of new facilities and services

Secondary goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

Development and implementation of civil protection measures to prevent emergencies and protect the population in peacetime and wartime.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

The building must ensure safety for the life and health of citizens, property of individuals or legal entities, state or municipal property, the environment, life and health of animals and plants. During the reconstruction of the facility, measures must be taken to prevent the impact of dangerous and harmful production factors on workers and persons directly on the construction site and the adjacent territory. Necessary measures must be taken to eliminate errors by persons participating in the construction process, and personnel who meet the qualifications must be allowed to work, including the use of a system of control and licensing of the rights to conduct various types of professional activities. Ensuring the required quality of materials, structures, products and the quality of work by organizing incoming, post-operational and acceptance control, compliance with technological processes and the organization of construction production. The building must have high-quality decoration of objects, decorative and artistic elements, elements of landscaping of the main and adjacent territory. The main requirement that determines the reliability of a construction object is its suitability for its intended purpose and the ability to maintain the necessary operational qualities throughout its entire service life.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Other economic

30506529.4 UAH

Number of people who will use the service

360 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Education and science

Subsector

School education

Stream

Ensuring the safety of participants in the educational process by creating or modernizing the protective infrastructure of general secondary education institutions

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

2.6.2.3 Construction and reconstruction and major repairs of buildings, including their roofs, communication systems, boiler rooms, equipment of state and municipal preschool, general education, and after-school educational institutions

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
Protecting people from radioactive contamination and other dangerous factors during emergencies, as well as ensuring their safety by creating a protective structure
360 human
360 human

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

метод кінцевого використання
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
50
360 human
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?

No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?

Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

None of the options are applicable

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

None of the options are applicable

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?

Women's participation is ensured at various stages of planning (including public hearings)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?

All possible positive impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?

Not provided for by the project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
PRU expertise.pdf
09.12.2025
21:00:07 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

When building a radiation shelter (RSS), in addition to traditional reinforced concrete structures, there are alternative solutions that can be mobile, cheaper, or faster to install.

Technical Solution 2

Modular/prefabricated construction of a radiation shelter

Total costs36'175'063 UAH4'410'000 UAH
  • For preparation
    • 912'329 UAH630'000 UAH
  • For implementation
    • 35'012'734 UAH3'600'000 UAH
  • For operation
    • 250'000 UAH60'000 UAH
  • For closing
    • 0 UAH120'000 UAH
    Average annual costs285'000 UAH20'000 UAH
    Project duration, incl.11 months4 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
    • 3 months2 months
  • Implementation period
    • 8 months2 months
    Service life1200 months720 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active

    [The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Rejected

    [The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Components of a technical solution
    To components
    0
    To components
    0

    Commercial Justification

    Supplier and contractor market assessment

    Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
    Yes, only national

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
    Для реалізації проекту будівництва протирадіаційного укриття (ПРУ) в Олександрівському ліцеї обрана конкурентна стратегія закупівель через електронну систему Prozorro, що є обов'язковою вимогою чинного законодавства України для використання публічних коштів

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
    Забезпечення прозорості та відкритості процедури

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
    Open competitive bidding

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Pre-market engagement
    Попереднє залучення ринку (Market Sounding або Pre-market engagement) для проєкту будівництва ПРУ в Олександрівському ліцеї здійснювалося неформально та опосередковано, оскільки українське законодавство про публічні закупівлі не передбачає офіційної процедури "попереднього залучення ринку" перед оголошенням тендеру

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Potential market participants
    На ринку України та Миколаївської області існує низка організацій, які потенційно можуть взяти участь у проекті як підрядники або постачальники: Потенційні Генеральні Підрядники (Будівельні компанії), Потенційні Консультанти (Експертиза та нагляд)

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Market readiness assessment
    Ринок має необхідні ресурси та технології, а регуляторні умови не створюють значних перешкод. Основні виклики лежать в економічній площині та кадровому дефіциті. Замовник, використовуючи прозорі конкурентні процедури закупівель (Prozorro) та залучаючи незалежний технічний нагляд, зможе успішно реалізувати проєкт.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget36'175'063 UAH4'410'000 UAH
    Capital costs36'175'063 UAH4'410'000 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation912'329 UAH630'000 UAH
    For implementation35'012'734 UAH3'600'000 UAH
    For operation250'000 UAH60'000 UAH
    For closing0 UAH120'000 UAH
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service UnitСередня вартість на одного отримувача послуги
    Service Unit Cost124'000 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?

    ResponseNoNo

    Availability of services

    Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
    Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Funding Sources

    Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
    Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH

    Public-private partnership

    Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
    The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management Rationale

    Team competencies

    Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
    Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - economic analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - communication with stakeholders

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - risk management

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - social and gender analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - public consultations

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of available procurement options

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - legal support

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial analysis - financial analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - demand analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - environmental expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of the market environment

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
    Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
    None of the options are applicable
    Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
    Yes, negotiations are already underway.

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
    Specialists in interaction with international financial organizations (IFOs)

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Environmental experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial consultants/modelers

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Legal consultants

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Commercial experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic analysts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic consultants

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Technical experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Social/gender consultants

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management experts / project managers

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Risk assessment

    Technical riskDefinedUndefined
    Financial riskDefinedUndefined
    Economic riskDefinedUndefined
    Political riskDefinedUndefined
    Social riskDefinedUndefined
    Operational riskDefinedUndefined
    Market riskDefinedUndefined
    Environmental riskDefinedUndefined

    Organizational events

    ResponseDefinedUndefined

    Team involvement

    How exactly are/will stakeholders be involved?
    Focus group

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Online survey

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Meetings with local authorities

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Public consultations

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Public hearings

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    When are/will engagement activities be taking place?
    At the project monitoring stage

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    At the project implementation stage

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    At the project preparation stage

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    How is/will the public be informed about the importance of participation and available channels for feedback?
    Social networks

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Local media

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are public hearings being held/will they be held (offline, online)?
    Yes, offline.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    проведення певних форм громадського обговорення або слухань є стандартною та очікуваною практикою для забезпечення прозорості та врахування думки громади щодо такого важливого соціального проекту
    Who will attend the public hearings?
    Representatives of public organizations

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Community representatives

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Government officials

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Public hearings have already been held
    No

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

    Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?

    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?

    None of the options are applicable

    Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

    None of the options are applicable
    Need for financing

    Does the project require additional funding for preparation?

    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Approval History

    DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasons
    09/12/2025SP-L-091225-F1D8CEE8Community SPPreliminary Investment Feasibility StudyInclude-
    10/12/2025SP-L-101225-EBCBBF22Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-
    11/01/2026SP-N-110126-AD8ACE90State SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-
    12/12/2025SPP-L-121225-9490173FCommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-