New construction of an anti-radiation shelter in the Oleksandrivka Lyceum named after T.G. Shevchenko at 244 Podziguna Generala St. in the village of Oleksandrivka, Voznesensky district, Mykolaiv region. Correction

Sector
Education and science
Stream
Ensuring the safety of participants in the educational process by creating or modernizing the protective infrastructure of general secondary education institutions
Maturity level
97
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The new construction of the PRU is safety for students and teaching staff, designed for 360 people. The premises are provided with engineering systems of heating, ventilation, water supply, sewage, electric lighting, which contribute to the normal functioning of the PRU, create an appropriate microclimate and ensure compliance with sanitary and hygienic standards. Since there are no civil defense facilities within a radius of 500 meters from the lyceum that are ready for shelter, 599 students study at the lyceum and today the simplest shelter of the lyceum can accommodate 190 people from all students. The shelter provides for the possible further construction of a section to increase the number of those sheltered.

The purpose of the project

Main Goal:

Creation of new facilities and services

Secondary Goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

Development and implementation of civil protection measures to prevent emergencies and protect the population in peacetime and wartime.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

The building must ensure safety for the life and health of citizens, property of individuals or legal entities, state or municipal property, the environment, life and health of animals and plants. During the reconstruction of the facility, measures must be taken to prevent the impact of dangerous and harmful production factors on workers and persons directly on the construction site and the adjacent territory. Necessary measures must be taken to eliminate errors by persons participating in the construction process, and personnel who meet the qualifications must be allowed to work, including the use of a system of control and licensing of the rights to conduct various types of professional activities. Ensuring the required quality of materials, structures, products and the quality of work by organizing incoming, post-operational and acceptance control, compliance with technological processes and the organization of construction production. The building must have high-quality decoration of objects, decorative and artistic elements, elements of landscaping of the main and adjacent territory. The main requirement that determines the reliability of a construction object is its suitability for its intended purpose and the ability to maintain the necessary operational qualities throughout its entire service life.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Other economic

30506529.4 UAH

Number of people who will use the service

360 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Education and science

Subsector

School education

Stream

Ensuring the safety of participants in the educational process by creating or modernizing the protective infrastructure of general secondary education institutions

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

2.6.2.3 Construction and reconstruction and major repairs of buildings, including their roofs, communication systems, boiler rooms, equipment of state and municipal preschool, general education, and after-school educational institutions

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
Protecting people from radioactive contamination and other dangerous factors during emergencies, as well as ensuring their safety by creating a protective structure
360 human
360 human

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

метод кінцевого використання
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
50
360 human
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?

No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?

Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

None of the options are applicable

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

None of the options are applicable

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?

Women's participation is ensured at various stages of planning (including public hearings)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?

All possible positive impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?

Not provided for by the project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
PRU expertise.pdf
09.12.2025
21:00:07 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

When building a radiation shelter (RSS), in addition to traditional reinforced concrete structures, there are alternative solutions that can be mobile, cheaper, or faster to install.

Technical Solution 2

Modular/prefabricated construction of a radiation shelter

Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)35'925'063 UAH4'230'000 UAH
For preparation912'329 UAH630'000 UAH
For implementation35'012'734 UAH3'600'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost250'000 UAH180'000 UAH
For operation250'000 UAH60'000 UAH
For closing0 UAH120'000 UAH
Average annual costs285'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.11 months4 months
Deadline for developing a FFS3 months2 months
Implementation period8 months2 months
Service life1200 months720 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active

[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Rejected

[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Components of a technical solution
To components
0
To components
0

Commercial Justification

Supplier and contractor market assessment

Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
Для реалізації проекту будівництва протирадіаційного укриття (ПРУ) в Олександрівському ліцеї обрана конкурентна стратегія закупівель через електронну систему Prozorro, що є обов'язковою вимогою чинного законодавства України для використання публічних коштів

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
Забезпечення прозорості та відкритості процедури

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
Open competitive bidding

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Pre-market engagement
Попереднє залучення ринку (Market Sounding або Pre-market engagement) для проєкту будівництва ПРУ в Олександрівському ліцеї здійснювалося неформально та опосередковано, оскільки українське законодавство про публічні закупівлі не передбачає офіційної процедури "попереднього залучення ринку" перед оголошенням тендеру

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Potential market participants
На ринку України та Миколаївської області існує низка організацій, які потенційно можуть взяти участь у проекті як підрядники або постачальники: Потенційні Генеральні Підрядники (Будівельні компанії), Потенційні Консультанти (Експертиза та нагляд)

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Market readiness assessment
Ринок має необхідні ресурси та технології, а регуляторні умови не створюють значних перешкод. Основні виклики лежать в економічній площині та кадровому дефіциті. Замовник, використовуючи прозорі конкурентні процедури закупівель (Prozorro) та залучаючи незалежний технічний нагляд, зможе успішно реалізувати проєкт.

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial justification

Total project budget

Total preliminary budget36'175'063 UAH4'410'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)35'925'063 UAH4'230'000 UAH
For preparation912'329 UAH630'000 UAH
For implementation35'012'734 UAH3'600'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost250'000 UAH180'000 UAH
For operation250'000 UAH60'000 UAH
For closing0 UAH120'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Average project cost per service recipient

Service UnitСередня вартість на одного отримувача послуги
Service Unit Cost124'000 UAH

Profitability of the project

Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Is the project self-sustaining?No

Availability of services

Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Financing Mechanisms

Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

Source and MechanismYesNo

Funding Sources

Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH

Public-private partnership

Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Management Rationale

Team competencies

Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - economic analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - communication with stakeholders

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - risk management

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - social and gender analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - public consultations

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of available procurement options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - legal support

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial analysis - financial analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - demand analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - environmental expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of the market environment

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Yes, negotiations are already underway.

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
Specialists in interaction with international financial organizations (IFOs)

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Environmental experts

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial consultants/modelers

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Legal consultants

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Commercial experts

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic analysts

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic consultants

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Technical experts

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Social/gender consultants

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Management experts / project managers

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Risk assessment

Technical riskDefinedUndefined
Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Economic riskDefinedUndefined
Political riskDefinedUndefined
Social riskDefinedUndefined
Operational riskDefinedUndefined
Market riskDefinedUndefined
Environmental riskDefinedUndefined

Organizational events

ResponseDefinedUndefined

Team involvement

How exactly are/will stakeholders be involved?
Focus group

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Online survey

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Meetings with local authorities

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Public consultations

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Public hearings

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

When are/will engagement activities be taking place?
At the project monitoring stage

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

At the project implementation stage

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

At the project preparation stage

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

How is/will the public be informed about the importance of participation and available channels for feedback?
Social networks

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Local media

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Are public hearings being held/will they be held (offline, online)?
Yes, offline.

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

проведення певних форм громадського обговорення або слухань є стандартною та очікуваною практикою для забезпечення прозорості та врахування думки громади щодо такого важливого соціального проекту
Who will attend the public hearings?
Representatives of public organizations

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Experts

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Community representatives

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Government officials

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Public hearings have already been held
No

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?

None of the options are applicable

Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

None of the options are applicable
Need for financing

Does the project require additional funding for preparation?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
09/12/2025SP-L-091225-F1D8CEE8Community SPPreliminary Investment Feasibility StudyInclude--
10/12/2025SP-L-101225-EBCBBF22Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
11/01/2026SP-N-110126-AD8ACE90State SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
12/12/2025SPP-L-121225-9490173FCommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-97