Reconstruction of the catering unit of Derazhnya Lyceum No. 3 named after Hero of Ukraine Ivan Zubkov of Derazhnya City Council, Khmelnytskyi region at the address: Volodymyr Solomchuk St., 2-A, Derazhnya, Khmelnytskyi district, Khmelnytskyi region

Sector
Education and science
Stream
Ensuring access to high-quality and safe food in educational institutions by developing a modern infrastructure of canteens (catering blocks).
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project for the reconstruction of the catering unit of Derazhnya Lyceum No. 3 named after Hero of Ukraine Ivan Zubkov is aimed at creating modern and safe conditions for organizing student meals. It is planned to update the premises and equipment, bringing them into compliance with sanitary and fire safety requirements. The implementation of the project will ensure high-quality, balanced nutrition for schoolchildren and contribute to preserving their health

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards

Secondary goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Introducing innovations and energy-efficient solutions, Improving the quality of services

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The goal of the project is to create a modern, safe and functional catering unit in Derazhnya Lyceum No. 3 named after the Hero of Ukraine Ivan Zubkov by reconstructing the premises and equipping them with new equipment that will ensure high-quality and balanced nutrition for students in accordance with sanitary and hygienic standards. The method of achieving the goal is to reconstruct the premises of the catering unit, replace outdated communications, install modern technological equipment (steam combi oven, dishwasher, dough mixer, multicooker, etc.), and equip ventilation and lighting systems in accordance with the requirements.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

The organization of high-quality and balanced nutrition in an educational institution largely depends on the technical condition of the equipment in the catering unit. Unfortunately, many schools still use outdated stoves, ovens, refrigerators and other equipment that have long been in need of replacement. This creates a number of problems: the process of preparing dishes using modern technologies is complicated; the opportunity to diversify the menu with steamed vegetables, baked dishes or dietary products is reduced; time and energy costs increase due to the low efficiency of old equipment; there is a risk of equipment malfunctions, which can negatively affect the quality and safety of food. Such conditions do not allow for the full implementation of modern standards of healthy nutrition, which include minimizing fried foods, using gentle methods of food processing and cooking food rich in vitamins and nutrients. Updating the equipment of the dining block is an investment in children's health, because only a modern kitchen makes it possible to prepare tasty, healthy, and varied food according to the needs of schoolchildren.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of IDP users

15 human

Number of employees of the institution/institution/organization

60 human

Number of users from low-mobility population groups

3 human

Number of people who will use the service

450 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Education and science

Subsector

School education

Stream

Ensuring access to high-quality and safe food in educational institutions by developing a modern infrastructure of canteens (catering blocks).

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

2 2.3.2. Improving children's nutrition in preschool and general secondary education institutions

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
new
1 units
1 units

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

None of the options are applicable

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
financial analysis2.pdf
21.10.2025
17:13:41 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Reconstruction of the catering unit of Derazhnya Lyceum No. 3 named after Hero of Ukraine Ivan Zubkov of Derazhnya City Council, Khmelnytskyi region at the address: Volodymyr Solomchuk St., 2-A, Derazhnya, Khmelnytskyi district, Khmelnytskyi region

Technical Solution 2

New construction of the catering unit

Total costs2'000'000 UAH14'000'001 UAH
  • For preparation
    • 100'000 UAH200'000 UAH
  • For implementation
    • 1'800'000 UAH13'600'000 UAH
  • For operation
    • 99'999 UAH200'000 UAH
  • For closing
    • 1 UAH1 UAH
    Average annual costs12'000 UAH60'000 UAH
    Project duration, incl.12 months17 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
    • 5 months5 months
  • Implementation period
    • 7 months12 months
    Service life360 months360 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active

    [The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Rejected

    [The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Components of a technical solution
    To components
    1
    To components
    0

    Commercial Justification

    Supplier and contractor market assessment

    Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
    Yes, only national

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget2'000'000 UAH14'000'001 UAH
    Capital costs2'000'000 UAH14'000'001 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation100'000 UAH200'000 UAH
    For implementation1'800'000 UAH13'600'000 UAH
    For operation99'999 UAH200'000 UAH
    For closing1 UAH1 UAH
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service Unit1
    Service Unit Cost280 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?

    ResponseNoNo

    Availability of services

    Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
    Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Funding Sources

    Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
    Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH

    Public-private partnership

    Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
    No, no assessment was conducted.

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management Rationale

    Team competencies

    Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
    Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - economic analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - communication with stakeholders

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - risk management

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - social and gender analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - public consultations

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of available procurement options

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - legal support

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial analysis - financial analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - demand analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - environmental expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of the market environment

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
    Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
    None of the options are applicable
    Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
    No, I need help.

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Risk assessment

    Technical riskDefinedUndefined
    Financial riskDefinedUndefined

    Team involvement

    How exactly are/will stakeholders be involved?
    Focus group

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Online survey

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Meetings with local authorities

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Public consultations

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Public hearings

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    When are/will engagement activities be taking place?
    At the project monitoring stage

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    At the project implementation stage

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    At the project preparation stage

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    How is/will the public be informed about the importance of participation and available channels for feedback?
    Official websites

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    https://osv.org.ua/rada/44013857/
    Social networks

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Local media

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are public hearings being held/will they be held (offline, online)?
    Yes, online

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    https://osv.org.ua/rada/44013857/
    Who will attend the public hearings?
    Representatives of public organizations

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Community representatives

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Government officials

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Public hearings have already been held
    No

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

    Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

    Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
    Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of the feasibility study
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
    Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Approval History

    DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasons
    21/10/2025SP-L-211025-A5EC0A4FCommunity SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-
    16/02/2026SP-N-160226-FFC0E489State SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-
    28/10/2025SPP-L-281025-ACF4A44ECommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-