Major renovation of part of the basement (the simplest shelter) of Primary School No. 41 of the Poltava City Council at the address: Davydovskogo Lane, 12, Poltava


Sector
Education and science
Stream
Arrangement of civil defense protective structures (shelters) in secondary education institutions and ensuring their accessibility for all participants in the educational process
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

Overhaul of part of the basement (the simplest shelter) of Primary School No. 41 of the Poltava City Council at the address: Davydovskogo Lane, 12, Poltava

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Improving the condition of infrastructure

Secondary goal:

Improving the quality of services

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

renovated shelter to ensure offline training mode during martial law

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

renovated shelter to ensure offline training mode during martial law

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of people who will use the service

150 human

Number of IDP users

10 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Education and science

Subsector

School education

Stream

Arrangement of civil defense protective structures (shelters) in secondary education institutions and ensuring their accessibility for all participants in the educational process

Strategic document

State Strategy for Regional Development for 2021–2027

Task

1.2.1; 1.2.10; 2.1.21 Improving the material and technical base of educational institutions, ensuring the quality of educational services; Ensuring accessibility, meeting educational needs with special educational needs; Promoting an increase in the fund of civil defense protective structures, taking into account the principles of inclusiveness and accessibility

Project objectives

Project objectives were not specified by the initiator

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

None of the options are applicable

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

None of the options are applicable

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
expert report 41 shelters.pdf
20.01.2026
18:39:39 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Major renovation of part of the basement (the simplest shelter) of Primary School No. 41 of the Poltava City Council at the address: Davydovskogo Lane, 12, Poltava

Technical Solution 2

Do not carry out major repairs to part of the basement (the simplest shelter) of Primary School No. 41 of the Poltava City Council at the address: Davydovskogo Lane, 12, Poltava

Total costs12'948'833 UAH0 UAH
  • For preparation
  • 1 UAH0 UAH
  • For implementation
  • 12'948'830 UAH0 UAH
  • For operation
  • 1 UAH0 UAH
  • For closing
  • 1 UAH0 UAH
    Average annual costs130'000 UAH1 UAH
    Project duration, incl.5 months2 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
  • 1 month1 month
  • Implementation period
  • 4 months1 month
    Service life1200 months1 month
    Target indicatorsDefined Not defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active

    [The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Pending

    [The project initiator has not taken any decision about this alternative technical approach.]

    Components of a technical solution
    To components
    1
    To components
    0

    Commercial Justification

    Supplier and contractor market assessment

    Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
    Yes, only national

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget12'948'833 UAH0 UAH
    Capital costs12'948'833 UAH0 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation1 UAH0 UAH
    For implementation12'948'830 UAH0 UAH
    For operation1 UAH0 UAH
    For closing1 UAH0 UAH
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service Unit-
    Service Unit Cost1 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo

    Availability of services

    Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
    Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Funding Sources

    Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
    Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH

    Public-private partnership

    Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
    The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management Rationale

    Team competencies

    Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
    Economic justification - economic analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - social and gender analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - environmental expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
    Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
    Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - social and gender analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - environmental expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - economic analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
    Yes, negotiations are already underway.

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Risk assessment

    Technical riskDefinedUndefined
    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

    Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

    None of the options are applicable

    Project Approval History

    DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasons
    20/01/2026SP-L-200126-B603D7B4Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-
    22/01/2026SPP-L-220126-D20F0BE8Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-