New construction of a protective civil defense structure (radiation shelter) on the territory of the secondary school of grades I-III No. 44 of the Kherson City Council at the address: Kherson, Academician Tarle St., 10

Sector
Education and science
Stream
Arrangement of civil defense protective structures (shelters) in secondary education institutions.
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project envisages the creation of safe conditions for the population by constructing a protective civil protection structure (radiation shelter). The existing basement in the building cannot serve as a protective structure.  &   Construction of a one-story protective structure for civil defense (anti-radiation shelter – «underground school») with a total area of 1316.5.1 sq. m. in which conditions will be created for the temporary stay of children and teachers of the school in the event of a danger to their life and health as a result of emergency situations. The protective structure will be provided with appropriate conditions for ensuring access and stay of disabled people. The spatial planning and constructive solutions, special and other engineering equipment, systems and life support means of the protective structure will comply with building codes and regulatory legal acts, and will provide a barrier-free adapted environment for children with special educational needs. The walls and floor of the structure and combined coverings bordering the ground will be insulated. Heating will be provided by wall-mounted electric converters. The shelter building will be equipped with supply and exhaust systems with recuperators. The bathrooms will have exhaust ventilation with mechanical drive with automatic regulation,  air conditioning  from split systems. Provision of  the protective structure  with special and other engineering equipment, systems and means of life support. Furnishing with furniture and inventory  the premises  of the  underground school», namely: classrooms, sanitary rooms, a medical station, a cafeteria, a staff room, additional rooms that will ensure the operation of the shelter (rooms for containers for placing food products and containers with drinking water, and external tanks for sewage, food, etc.). The anti-radiation shelter will be equipped and equipped with the necessary equipment, furniture and inventory.  For the implementation of the project, design and estimate documentation was developed and a positive expert report ЭХ01:2501-5877-4773-4987 was received. In 2024, design and estimate documentation was developed.  & It is planned to complete the construction of the "underground school", with a design capacity of 450 places, in May 2028.  The construction of such a structure will allow Kherson participants in the educational process to switch to a full-time/blended form of education. Nearby is a children's and youth sports school, which will also be able to use the protective structure of civil defense. The "Underground School", in peacetime, will be used for extracurricular activities, sports clubs, a military – patriotic club, and a center for psychological support for participants in the educational process.

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Creation of new facilities and services

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

Increase the fund of protective structures in secondary education institutions by building a new PRU,. Increase the number of students who will have safe conditions for studying in a full-time/blended format.. Thanks to the implementation of the project: the dual-purpose building will be equipped in accordance with the established requirements for the educational environment; participants in the educational process of the microdistrict will be provided with safe conditions to preserve life during emergencies; accessibility is provided for low-mobility segments of the population. The arrangement of a safe educational space will contribute to the return of families with children to the city.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

Problems and results of their solution as a result of the project implementation: Problem: Difficult security situation: risks to life and health. Solution: The arrangement of a protective structure (PRU) for 450 people will allow to protect participants in the educational process and local residents in case of danger, the level of protection is much higher than the usual simplest shelters. Problem: Availability of only distance learning. Solution: The dual purpose of the structure will allow to safely carry out the educational process in an offline format, to reduce the risks of educational losses. Additionally, the project will influence the creation of favorable conditions for families with children, the return of residents to the city. The protective structure will also be able to be used by pupils of the children's and youth sports school.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of people who will use the service

450 human

Other functional

1 units

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Education and science

Subsector

School education

Stream

Arrangement of civil defense protective structures (shelters) in secondary education institutions.

Strategic document

State Strategy for Regional Development for 2021–2027

Task

Strategic goal 2 operational goal 1 task 21 Promoting the increase in the stock of civil defense protective structures, taking into account the principles of inclusiveness and accessibility

Project objectives

Project objectives were not specified by the initiator

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Assessment of the number of ready-made shelters in educational institutions, the number of school-age children, and the general demographic situation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
450 places
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?

No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?

Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?

No consultations were held with target groups.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?

None of the options are applicable

Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?

Not provided for by the project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Expert report for secondary school 44.pdf
25.12.2025
04:52:34 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

New construction of the PRU for ZZSO No. 44

Technical Solution 2

Alternative technical solutions for the construction of a new modular shelter for 292 people on the territory of the secondary school of grades I-III No. 44 of the Kherson City Council at the address: Kherson, Akademika Tarle St., 10

Total costs89'864'946 UAH40'528'000 UAH
  • For preparation
    • 0 UAH100'000 UAH
  • For implementation
    • 89'864'946 UAH40'000'000 UAH
  • For operation
    • 0 UAH420'000 UAH
  • For closing
    • 0 UAH8'000 UAH
    Average annual costs620'000 UAH620'000 UAH
    Project duration, incl.11 months8 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
    • 1 month4 months
  • Implementation period
    • 10 months4 months
    Service life840 months600 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active

    [The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Rejected

    [The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Components of a technical solution
    To components
    1
    To components
    0

    Commercial Justification

    Supplier and contractor market assessment

    Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
    Yes, only national

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
    Обрано стратегію проведення конкурентних закупівель для залучення кваліфікованої підрядної організації, що має досвід будівництва захисних споруд цивільного захисту. Доцільність стратегії обґрунтована пріоритетністю створення безпечних умов для населення в умовах воєнного стану. Враховуючи складність об'єкта (нове будівництво), стратегія базується на детальному аналізі ринку будівельних послуг, що дозволяє забезпечити дотримання державних будівельних норм (ДБН) та отримати найбільш економічно вигідну пропозицію.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
    Для забезпечення прозорості та ефективності будівництва планується: * Використання електронної системи ProZorro для проведення торгів та публікації всієї звітності. * Оприлюднення детальної проєктно-кошторисної документації та чітких вимог до технічних характеристик матеріалів. * Встановлення суворих кваліфікаційних критеріїв щодо наявності техніки, працівників відповідної кваліфікації та досвіду виконання аналогічних договорів. * Забезпечення незалежного технічного та авторського нагляду за ходом будівництва для контролю якості робіт та цільового використання коштів.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
    Open competitive bidding

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Pre-market engagement
    Попереднє залучення ринку здійснювалося шляхом аналізу відкритих даних у системі Prozorro щодо аналогічних проєктів будівництва укриттів у регіоні. Вже розроблена та затверджена проєктно-кошторисна документація. Можливе коригування термінів виконання робіт з урахуванням логістичних та безпекових особливостей прифронтової зони.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Potential market participants
    Потенційними учасниками є ліцензовані будівельні компанії України, які мають досвід зведення монолітних бетонних конструкцій та об’єктів цивільного захисту. Рівень конкуренції оцінюється як низький, оскільки незважаючи на те, що на ринку присутня достатня кількість підрядних організацій, здатних виконувати роботи за державними будівельними нормами В.2.2-5-97 (Захисні споруди цивільного захисту), розташування у зоні активних бойових дій обмежує кількість потенційних виконавців.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Market readiness assessment
    Ринок готовий до реалізації проєкту. В наявності є необхідні технології для швидкого зведення укриттів, а також доступ до будівельних ресурсів. Основними регуляторними бар’єрами можуть бути посилені вимоги до безпеки праці в зоні бойових дій.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget89'864'946 UAH40'528'000 UAH
    Capital costs89'864'946 UAH40'528'000 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation0 UAH100'000 UAH
    For implementation89'864'946 UAH40'000'000 UAH
    For operation0 UAH420'000 UAH
    For closing0 UAH8'000 UAH
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service UnitВартість будівлі захисної споруди
    Service Unit Cost90'520'359 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?

    ResponseNoNo

    Availability of services

    Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
    Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Funding Sources

    Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
    Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH

    Public-private partnership

    Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
    Yes, the project is suitable for PPP

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management Rationale

    Team competencies

    Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
    Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - economic analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - risk management

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - public consultations

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - legal support

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial analysis - financial analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - demand analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
    Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
    None of the options are applicable
    Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
    Partially, we are considering options

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
    Environmental experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial consultants/modelers

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Legal consultants

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Commercial experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic analysts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic consultants

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Technical experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management experts / project managers

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Risk assessment

    Financial riskDefinedUndefined
    Economic riskDefinedUndefined
    Other riskDefinedUndefined

    Organizational events

    ResponseDefinedUndefined
    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

    Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?

    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?

    None of the options are applicable

    Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

    None of the options are applicable
    Need for financing

    Does the project require additional funding for preparation?

    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Approval History

    DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasons
    25/12/2025SP-L-251225-6746FCA6Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-
    26/12/2025SPP-L-261225-54CE22CDCommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-