Reconstruction of the TP at M. Kulisha St., 5 in Kherson

Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Reconstruction of the TP at M. Kulisha St., 5 in Kherson
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project involves the reconstruction of the TP heat point at: 5 M. Kulisha St., which includes the replacement of equipment, the installation of new pumps, heat exchangers, shut-off valves, as well as automation of control depending on the external temperature.

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Introducing innovations and energy-efficient solutions

Secondary goal:

Rebuilding the damaged/destroyed, Improving the quality of services

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The implementation of the project will make it possible to provide uninterrupted thermal energy during the heating season, eliminating emergency shutdowns of the heating station by installing modern, energy-saving equipment.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

During the period of operation, the equipment has exhausted its resource and is in an emergency state, which leads to emergency shutdowns. As a result of the implementation, we will receive a modern heating station with automatic control of pumping equipment, coolant supply in accordance with the outdoor air temperature.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of people who will use the service

338 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Municipal infrastructure and services

Subsector

District Heating

Stream

Reconstruction of the TP at M. Kulisha St., 5 in Kherson

Strategic document

State Strategy for Regional Development for 2021–2027

Task

11 Modernization, adaptability and decarbonization of district heating systems

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value

Demand for the service and its dynamics

Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
25
830 human
Economic justification

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Reconstruction of the TP at M. Kulisha St., 5 in Kherson

Technical Solution 2

Construction of a new TP at 5 Kulisha Street in Kherson

Total costs6'500'000 UAH8'060'000 UAH
  • For preparation
    • 0 UAH800'000 UAH
  • For implementation
    • 6'500'000 UAH7'000'000 UAH
  • For operation
    • 0 UAH110'000 UAH
  • For closing
    • 0 UAH150'000 UAH
    Average annual costs235'720 UAH110'000 UAH
    Project duration, incl.5 months18 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
    • 1 month6 months
  • Implementation period
    • 4 months12 months
    Service life180 months240 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active
    Rejected
    Components of a technical solution
    To components
    1
    To components
    0

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget6'500'000 UAH8'060'000 UAH
    Capital costs6'500'000 UAH8'060'000 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation0 UAH800'000 UAH
    For implementation6'500'000 UAH7'000'000 UAH
    For operation0 UAH110'000 UAH
    For closing0 UAH150'000 UAH

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service UnitНа одного жителя, який користується послугами
    Service Unit Cost7'832 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?

    ResponseNoNo

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Funding Sources

    Approved Funds6'500'000 UAH0 UAH
    Expected Funds6'500'000 UAH0 UAH
    Management Rationale

    Risk assessment

    Economic riskDefinedUndefined
    Other riskDefinedUndefined
    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Economic Analysis
    Social benefits and costs
    Benefits - Support for critical infrastructure, Reduction of social tension, Improvement of the ecology of the residential area. Costs - Temporary inconvenience, Planned outages
    Environmental benefits and costs
    Benefits - Energy saving and efficiency, Prevention of soil pollution, Environmental safety of materials. Costs - Waste disposal problem, Temporary damage to the landscape
    Indirect benefits and costs
    Benefits - Reduced load on water and heating networks, Support for "points of invincibility". Costs - Additional load on road infrastructure, Temporary reduction in the attractiveness of the surrounding area