Major repairs of water supply networks on part of Olimpiyska Street, part of Olimpiysky Lane and part of Novy Lane in the village of Mayaki, Odessa District, Odessa Region
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Restoration, development and modernization of centralized water supply and wastewater infrastructure, including the introduction of alternative energy sources
Maturity level
80
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
The project involves a comprehensive overhaul of water supply networks located on certain sections of Olimpiyska Street, as well as Olimpiysky and Novy lanes in the village of Mayaki. The main goal of the planned works is to completely replace physically worn and morally obsolete pipelines with modern polyethylene analogues that have a much longer service life, higher corrosion resistance and better throughput. The implementation of this solution will significantly reduce the level of technological water losses due to hidden leaks, eliminate frequent emergency situations and provide residents of the specified streets with a stable 24-hour water supply with the appropriate level of pressure in the system.
The purpose of the project
Main Goal:
Improving the condition of infrastructure
Secondary Goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards, Increasing compliance with modern standards, Improving the equality of wealth distribution, Increasing the even distribution of resources, Introducing innovations and energy-efficient solutions, Improving the quality of services, Reducing territorial or social gaps
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
The main objective of this public investment project is to carry out a major overhaul of a section of the water supply network to ensure stable domestic, drinking and fire-fighting water supply in the village of Mayaki. The project is aimed at completely replacing pipelines that have already reached their standard service life, which will ensure the safety and reliability of engineering infrastructure for the population.
For the successful implementation of the project and achievement of target indicators, the following technical and organizational methods are envisaged:
Network renewal: laying a new route with a total length of 1625 m using modern polyethylene pipes of the PE 80 SDR17 brand of various diameters: 110 mm (1120 m), 90 mm (85 m) and 63 mm (420 m).
Continuity of services: new pipelines will be laid parallel to the existing ones in territories free from development, which will allow water supply to consumers to be uninterrupted during construction.
Modernization of fittings and equipment: installation of 17 new water supply wells made of precast reinforced concrete and replacement of outdated disc valves with modern valves.
Ensuring fire safety: installation of 9 fire hydrants (Du100) to ensure the estimated water flow for fire extinguishing of 10 l/s.
Application of modern technologies: at the intersections of the carriageway of roads, the method of puncture in steel cases will be used, which minimizes damage to the road surface.
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
The main problem that necessitated the overhaul is the critical technical condition of the networks, which have fully served their established service life. According to the results of the survey conducted in 2023, it was officially established that sections of the water supply system are in an emergency condition. The current infrastructure no longer meets the requirements for reliability and safe operation of engineering structures, which creates risks of constant surges and interruptions in the provision of services to residents. In addition, the existing system cannot fully ensure modern fire safety standards, which requires the relocation of pipes parallel to existing routes with the installation of new fire hydrants and modern shut-off valves.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Population in the geographical area of influence of the project
984 human
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Subsector
Water supply and sanitation
Stream
Restoration, development and modernization of centralized water supply and wastewater infrastructure, including the introduction of alternative energy sources
Strategic document
Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади
Task
2.2 Providing centralized water supply and drainage
Project objectives
Indicator
Base value
Target value
Pipeline with a diameter of 90 mm
0 m
85 m
Number of installed fire hydrants (DN100)
0 units
9 units
Pipeline with a diameter of 110 mm
0 m
1120 m
Number of new water wells
0 units
17 units
Pipeline with a diameter of 63 mm
0 m
420 m
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
Major repairs of water supply networks
Technical Solution 2
Renovation of the water supply network using the rehabilitation method (pulling a polymer sleeve or U-liner pipe) without opening the roadway.
Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)3'784'554 UAH3'220'000 UAH
For preparation1'020'388 UAH120'000 UAH
For implementation2'764'166 UAH3'100'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost200'000 UAH200'000 UAH
For operation100'000 UAH100'000 UAH
For closing100'000 UAH100'000 UAH
Average annual costs100'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.3 months4 months
Deadline for developing a FFS1 month2 months
Implementation period2 months2 months
Service life600 months600 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, both national and international
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget3'984'554 UAH3'420'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)3'784'554 UAH3'220'000 UAH
For preparation1'020'388 UAH120'000 UAH
For implementation2'764'166 UAH3'100'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost200'000 UAH200'000 UAH
For operation100'000 UAH100'000 UAH
For closing100'000 UAH100'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service UnitСередня вартість проєкту на одного отримувача послуги
Service Unit Cost3'846 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
No – analysis not performed
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management Rationale
Team competencies
Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
None of the options are applicable
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Partially, we have limited experience
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Risk assessment
Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
20/12/2025SP-L-201225-EB8FEECCCommunity SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
23/12/2025SPP-L-231225-D0A91754Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-80