New construction of a protective civil defense structure (radiation shelter) on the territory of the State Educational Institution "Higher Vocational School No. 2 of Kherson" at the address: Kherson, Mykolaivske Shosse, 52.

Sector
Education and science
Stream
Arrangement of civil defense protective structures (shelters) in vocational education institutions.
Project Status
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Investment Feasibility Study
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

Since the beginning of the de-occupation of Kherson, the city has been under constant enemy fire. Due to its close proximity to the contact line, the Russian terrorist state has been shelling the Kherson urban territorial community with all possible types of weapons. Almost all educational institutions have been damaged. The densely built-up city center is suffering the most, and one can only dream of offline education for children and youth. But even in such conditions, 75,360 people remain in the community. And the issue of returning people to the city is acute. The restoration of Kherson requires the availability of professional and specialized personnel necessary for the post-war industries and enterprises of the region. Therefore, the demand for the restoration of vocational education in an offline format is growing, and for this, safe conditions must be created, in particular, shelters are provided for in educational institutions. In turn, the arrangement of safe conditions for receiving education will be one of the incentives for residents to return to the city. The main task of this project: to make the educational process as comfortable and safe as possible. The shelter area will be divided into different functional zones: educational, utility, sanitary, recreation area. Special attention will be paid to students with special educational needs and citizens with limited mobility. The shelter will be equipped with ramps, handrails, toilets, and all standards for free use of the institution's infrastructure will be provided. For visitors with visual impairments, including those with low vision, pedestrian zones will be equipped with contrasting relief lines in the premises of the institution and on its territory. Supply and exhaust ventilation is planned. For lighting the premises, only LED lamps are used, some of which will be equipped with rechargeable batteries, so that even in the event of a power outage in the school there will be light. During the design, the level of lighting relevant to educational institutions was taken into account. Our priority is to ensure the maximum possible safety of each participant in the educational process.

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Creation of new facilities and services

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

Indicators of goal achievement: A civil defense protective structure (radiation shelter) has been built in VPU 2. Civil defense capacity – 300 people Total area – 1051.90 sq.m. Access conditions for low-mobility population groups have been created

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

Given the current situation in the Kherson region, the resumption of full-time/blended education is possible only if there is a protective civil defense structure. The construction of a shelter minimizes risks for participants in the educational process, and also allows residents of neighboring buildings to be protected during shelling.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of people who will use the service

300 human

Number of IDPs in the geographical area of impact of the project

23457 human

Population in the geographical area of influence of the project

75360 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Education and science

Subsector

Professional education, specialized education

Stream

Arrangement of civil defense protective structures (shelters) in vocational education institutions.

Strategic document

State Strategy for Regional Development for 2021–2027

Task

Strategic goal 2 operational goal 1 task 21 Promoting the increase in the stock of civil defense protective structures, taking into account the principles of inclusiveness and accessibility

Project objectives

Project objectives were not specified by the initiator

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?

No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?

Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?

No consultations were held with target groups.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?

None of the options are applicable

Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?

Not provided for by the project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Expert report VPU 2.pdf
24.12.2025
20:12:39 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

New construction of the PRU for the VPU No. 2

Technical Solution 2

Construction of a modular shelter

Total costs82'923'872 UAH40'535'000 UAH
  • For preparation
    • 0 UAH100'000 UAH
  • For implementation
    • 82'923'872 UAH40'000'000 UAH
  • For operation
    • 0 UAH420'000 UAH
  • For closing
    • 0 UAH15'000 UAH
    Average annual costs250'000 UAH420'000 UAH
    Project duration, incl.11 months7 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
    • 1 month4 months
  • Implementation period
    • 10 months3 months
    Service life840 months600 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active

    [The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Rejected

    [The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Commercial Justification

    Supplier and contractor market assessment

    Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
    Yes, only national

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
    Обрано стратегію проведення конкурентних закупівель для залучення кваліфікованої підрядної організації, що має досвід будівництва захисних споруд цивільного захисту. Доцільність стратегії обґрунтована пріоритетністю створення безпечних умов для населення в умовах воєнного стану. Враховуючи складність об'єкта (нове будівництво), стратегія базується на детальному аналізі ринку будівельних послуг, що дозволяє забезпечити дотримання державних будівельних норм (ДБН) та отримати найбільш економічно вигідну пропозицію.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
    Для забезпечення прозорості та ефективності будівництва планується: * Використання електронної системи ProZorro для проведення торгів та публікації всієї звітності. * Оприлюднення детальної проєктно-кошторисної документації та чітких вимог до технічних характеристик матеріалів. * Встановлення суворих кваліфікаційних критеріїв щодо наявності техніки, працівників відповідної кваліфікації та досвіду виконання аналогічних договорів. * Забезпечення незалежного технічного та авторського нагляду за ходом будівництва для контролю якості робіт та цільового використання коштів.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
    Open competitive bidding

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Pre-market engagement
    Попереднє залучення ринку здійснювалося шляхом аналізу відкритих даних у системі Prozorro щодо аналогічних проєктів будівництва укриттів у регіоні. Вже розроблена та затверджена проєктно-кошторисна документація. Можливе коригування термінів виконання робіт з урахуванням логістичних та безпекових особливостей прифронтової зони.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Potential market participants
    Потенційними учасниками є ліцензовані будівельні компанії України, які мають досвід зведення монолітних бетонних конструкцій та об’єктів цивільного захисту. Рівень конкуренції оцінюється як низький, оскільки незважаючи на те, що на ринку присутня достатня кількість підрядних організацій, здатних виконувати роботи за державними будівельними нормами В.2.2-5-97 (Захисні споруди цивільного захисту), розташування у зоні активних бойових дій обмежує кількість потенційних виконавців.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Market readiness assessment
    Ринок готовий до реалізації проєкту. В наявності є необхідні технології для швидкого зведення укриттів, а також доступ до будівельних ресурсів. Основними регуляторними бар’єрами можуть бути посилені вимоги до безпеки праці в зоні бойових дій.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget82'923'872 UAH40'535'000 UAH
    Capital costs82'923'872 UAH40'535'000 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation0 UAH100'000 UAH
    For implementation82'923'872 UAH40'000'000 UAH
    For operation0 UAH420'000 UAH
    For closing0 UAH15'000 UAH
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service UnitВартість будівництва ПРУ
    Service Unit Cost91'993'913 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?

    ResponseNoNo

    Availability of services

    Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
    Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Public-private partnership

    Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
    The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management Rationale

    Team competencies

    Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
    Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - economic analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - communication with stakeholders

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - risk management

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - social and gender analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - public consultations

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of available procurement options

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - legal support

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial analysis - financial analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - demand analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of the market environment

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
    Partially, we have limited experience

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
    Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
    Partially, we are considering options

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
    Technical experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Social/gender consultants

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Risk assessment

    Other riskDefinedUndefined

    Organizational events

    ResponseDefinedUndefined
    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

    Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?

    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?

    None of the options are applicable

    Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

    None of the options are applicable
    Need for financing

    Does the project require additional funding for preparation?

    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Approval History

    DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasons
    25/12/2025SP-L-251225-4EA45DC9Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-
    26/12/2025SPP-L-261225-9463FD12Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-