Major overhaul of infrastructure facilities at the state border checkpoint for the road connection “Solotvyno - Sighetu Marmații”, including the preparation of design and estimate documentation
Sector
Transport Sector
Stream
Development and expansion of border infrastructure with the countries of the European Union and the Republic of Moldova
Project Status
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SP
Investment Feasibility Study
Implementation
Completion
- Preparation
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
General information
Description of the project
As part of the overhaul, engineering networks will be modernized, and energy efficiency and energy saving measures will be implemented for the infrastructure facilities of the checkpoint
The purpose of the project
Main goal:
Improving the condition of infrastructure
Secondary goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards, Ensuring inclusiveness and equal opportunities, Introducing innovations and energy-efficient solutions, Improving the quality of services
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
Based on the results of the MAPP survey, develop a master plan for major repairs aimed at restoring the operational characteristics of buildings and structures, modernizing equipment, and increasing their service life. It is planned to comprehensively modernize engineering networks, implement energy efficiency and energy saving measures for the infrastructure of the checkpoint
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
Problem
Outdated infrastructure
Solution
Development of a PCD for major repairs and implementation of developed solutions for infrastructure modernization
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Other functional
15 human
Other functional
1800 human
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Transport Sector
Subsector
Road Border Crossing Points
Stream
Development and expansion of border infrastructure with the countries of the European Union and the Republic of Moldova
Strategic document
Strategy for the Development and Expansion of Border Infrastructure with EU Countries and the Republic of Moldova until 2030
Task
Development and expansion of border road infrastructure, namely, state border crossing points for road traffic and access roads to them within controlled border areas
Project objectives
Project objectives were not specified by the initiator
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Demand for the service and its dynamics
What methodology was used to estimate demand?
Аналіз статистики органів державної влади
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
179139 human
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
2
806652 human
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
3
807842 human
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
4
852741 human
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
None of the options are applicable
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
None of the options are applicable
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
Major overhaul of infrastructure facilities at the state border checkpoint for the road connection “Solotvyno - Sighetu Marmații”, including the preparation of design and estimate documentation
Technical Solution 2
Reconstruction of the Solotvino - Sighetu Marmației checkpoint, including the production of design and estimate documentation
Total costs116'120'000 UAH390'500'000 UAH
Average annual costs7'800'000 UAH7'800'000 UAH
Project duration, incl.16 months24 months
Service life120 months360 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, both national and international
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget116'120'000 UAH390'500'000 UAH
Capital costs116'120'000 UAH390'500'000 UAH
Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH
Preliminary cost breakdown
Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
For preparation1'500'000 UAH4'500'000 UAH
For implementation34'620'000 UAH150'000'000 UAH
For operation78'000'000 UAH234'000'000 UAH
For closing2'000'000 UAH2'000'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service UnitЗабезпечення перетину кордону
Service Unit Cost80 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Is the project self-sustaining?No
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management Rationale
Team competencies
Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - communication with stakeholders
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - risk management
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - public consultations
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of available procurement options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - legal support
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial analysis - financial analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of the market environment
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
Economic feasibility study - technical expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - social and gender analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - environmental expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - economic analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management rationale - risk management
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - demand analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management rationale - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
No, I need help.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Risk assessment
Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Need for financing
Does the project require additional funding for preparation?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasons
17/08/2025SP-N-170825-83042B64State SPPreliminary Investment Feasibility StudyInclude-