New construction of a dual-purpose civil defense protective structure of the Chornomorsk Lyceum No. 3 of the Chornomorsk City Council, Odessa District, Odessa Region at the address: Chornomorsk, Parkova St., 10-A. Correction


Sector
Education and science
Stream
Arrangement of civil defense structures (shelters) in institutions providing secondary education
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project envisages the construction of a civil defense structure - a dual-purpose structure with protective properties of an anti-radiation shelter to ensure the protection of students of the Black Sea Lyceum No. 3, Kindergarten, and the staff of educational institutions during emergency situations. The building consists of two separate volumes: the main building of the anti-radiation shelter and the WPP building. The shelter building is designed to be rectangular in plan with maximum overall dimensions in the axes of 57.0 x 21.7 m. The building consists of two separate volumes: the main building of the anti-radiation shelter and the DES facility. The anti-radiation shelter building is one-story, underground type, the height of the floor is 2.7 m. The floor mark is below (on average) the planning mark of the land area by 2.5 - 4.5 m. The building is designed with three scattered entrances - exits with vestibules that lead directly to the belfry, two of which are equipped with vertical lifts for the disabled. As part of the anti-radiation shelter structure, the following rooms are designed: a room for sheltering children in grades 1-2 and 3-4, a room for children in grades 5-12, a room for sheltering children from nursery-kindergarten (in each of the rooms of the shelter there are places for the shelter of MGN and staff educational institutions); room for dirty clothes; electric panel; Ventilation chambers; premises for storing products; medical center; premises of water storage tanks; bathrooms (including for MGN); corridors; vestibules. Structural diagram of the building - with monolithic walls and diaphragms with monolithic slabs of the floor. Partitions are designed from aerated concrete blocks. The floor covering is designed from ceramic tiles and painted concrete base according to the purpose of the premises. The walls and ceilings are designed with plastering for painting. The entrance doors to the building are hermetically sealed, the internal windows and doors are polyvinyl chloride, and the exterior doors are fireproof. A children's playground with small architectural forms has been designed above the building. The DES building is separate, one-story, rectangular in shape with overall dimensions of the axes of 8 x 3.8 m. The building consists of one DES building. The roof is single-pitched, the roof covering is Euroruberoid. Structural scheme of the building - with monolithic reinforced concrete walls and monolithic reinforced concrete floor. Floor covering - painting on a concrete base. Walls and ceilings are planned with plastering for painting.

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Creation of new facilities and services

Secondary goal:

Improving the condition of infrastructure, Ensuring inclusiveness and equal opportunities, Meeting demand

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

Creation of a modern, safe, regulatory-compliant dual-purpose civil defense facility on the territory of the Black Sea Economic and Legal Lyceum No. 1 in order to guarantee the safety of students, teaching staff and the local population during emergencies, as well as ensuring the possibility of its use in peacetime for educational, cultural and public needs.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

Lack of a full-fledged protective structure on the territory of the lyceum Students and employees do not have the opportunity to quickly and safely take shelter during an air raid. Result after project implementation: A modern protective structure has been created, which provides 100% of the school contingent with reliable and promptly accessible shelter.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of people who will use the service

333 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Education and science

Subsector

School education

Stream

Arrangement of civil defense structures (shelters) in institutions providing secondary education

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

2.3.3 Ensure community preparedness for emergencies by creating a network of protective structures, fire safety systems, and building material and technical reserves. Raise awareness among residents about what to do in case of danger.

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
total area
0 m2
1247.22 m2

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?

No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?

Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

ове будівництво захисної споруди цивільного захисту подвійного призначення для Чорноморського ліцею № 3 не належить до видів планованої діяльності, визначених у статтях 3 та 7 зазначеного Закону, для яких проведення ОВД є обов’язковим.

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

The project may result in the forced displacement of women, men and other gender groups or loss of access to resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Other gender risks
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
There are risks of impaired mobility or safety for women, men and other gender groups during construction/operation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
There is a risk of reduced economic opportunities for women, men and other gender groups (e.g. loss of jobs or retail outlets)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Other benefits from project implementation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Envisaged training or advanced training for women in the private sector
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?

Focus groups or consultations with women and vulnerable groups were held
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Feedback on the project design was received from organizations working with women
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
No consultations were held with target groups.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Women's participation is ensured at various stages of planning (including public hearings)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?

All possible positive impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
A plan to mitigate negative social impacts focused on women has been developed
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The percentage of women who could be resettled has been quantified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The percentage of women who may lose or gain access to resources (water, food, healthcare) is quantified.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The percentage of women who will gain new educational/professional opportunities is quantified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
All possible negative impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?

A policy/code of conduct on non-discrimination and gender equality has been developed
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
A gender specialist/advisor is included in the project management structure
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Mandatory training for project staff on gender equality and inclusion is provided
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Not provided for by the project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Consolidated budget 3 lyceum.pdf
15.01.2026
13:57:15 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

New construction of a dual-purpose civil defense protective structure of the Chornomorsk Lyceum No. 3 of the Chornomorsk City Council, Odessa District, Odessa Region at the address: Chornomorsk, Parkova St., 10-A. Correction

Technical Solution 2

primary (mobile) shelter

Total costs102'872'424 UAH40'272'660 UAH
  • For preparation
  • 1'204'858 UAH0 UAH
  • For implementation
  • 101'257'504 UAH40'272'660 UAH
  • For operation
  • 226'460 UAH0 UAH
  • For closing
  • 183'602 UAH0 UAH
    Average annual costs780'000 UAH10'000 UAH
    Project duration, incl.20 months5 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
  • 6 months2 months
  • Implementation period
  • 14 months3 months
    Service life600 months120 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active

    [The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Rejected

    [The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Components of a technical solution
    To components
    0
    To components
    0

    Commercial Justification

    Supplier and contractor market assessment

    Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
    Yes, both national and international

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
    Стратегія закупівель – забезпечити ефективне, прозоре, економно обґрунтоване та своєчасне придбання товарів, робіт і послуг, необхідних для реалізації проєкту, з урахуванням відповідності технічним вимогам проєкту, вивчення цінових рівнів на будівельні матеріали та забезпечення належної якості і строків виконання

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
    використання електронної системи ProZorro, публічне звітування,

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
    Open competitive bidding

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Other

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Competitive dialogue

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Direct negotiation procedures

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Pre-market engagement
    Було проведено огляд: завершених і поточних тендерів на будівництво захисних споруд, укриттів та об’єктів цивільного захисту; закупівель аналогічних за масштабом об’єктів у закладах освіти; рівня конкуренції (кількість учасників, відсоток зниження ціни); середніх договірних цін та строків виконання робіт.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Potential market participants
    огляд відкритих тендерів, консультації з експертами, аналіз ринкових цін

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Market readiness assessment
    Ринок України загалом готовий до реалізації проєкту будівництва захисної споруди цивільного захисту подвійного призначення для закладу освіти. На ринку наявна достатня кількість кваліфікованих підрядників із досвідом будівництва укриттів та об’єктів цивільного захисту. Основні технології та будівельні матеріали (монолітний залізобетон, інженерні системи, вентиляція) є доступними та широко застосовуються, спеціалізоване обладнання може потребувати попереднього замовлення. Основними потенційними бар’єрами є тривалі регуляторні процедури, коливання цін на матеріали, логістичні ризики та підвищені вимоги до якості й безпеки. Водночас ці ризики є керованими за умови належного планування закупівель, конкурентних процедур та ефективного контролю виконання робіт.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget102'872'424 UAH40'272'660 UAH
    Capital costs102'872'424 UAH40'272'660 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation1'204'858 UAH0 UAH
    For implementation101'257'504 UAH40'272'660 UAH
    For operation226'460 UAH0 UAH
    For closing183'602 UAH0 UAH
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    No
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    No
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service Unitвартість на одну особу
    Service Unit Cost311'104 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?

    ResponseNoNo

    Availability of services

    Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
    Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Funding Sources

    Approved Funds83'518'800 UAH0 UAH
    Expected Funds83'518'800 UAH0 UAH

    Public-private partnership

    Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
    No, no assessment was conducted.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management Rationale

    Team competencies

    Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
    Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - economic analysis

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - communication with stakeholders

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - risk management

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - social and gender analysis

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - public consultations

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of available procurement options

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - legal support

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial analysis - financial analysis

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - demand analysis

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - environmental expertise

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of the market environment

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
    Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
    Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - social and gender analysis

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic justification - forming a justification for the problem and need

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management rationale - public consultation

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of the market environment

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - environmental expertise

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management rationale - project management

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management rationale - communication with stakeholders

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of available procurement options

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - economic analysis

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management justification - other

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial analysis - financial analysis

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management rationale - risk management

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - demand analysis

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management rationale - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management justification - legal support

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
    Yes, negotiations are already underway.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
    Specialists in interaction with international financial organizations (IFOs)

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Environmental experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Others

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial consultants/modelers

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Legal consultants

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Commercial experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic analysts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic consultants

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Technical experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Social/gender consultants

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management experts / project managers

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Organizational events

    ResponseDefinedUndefined
    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

    Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?

    No
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?

    Development of a full feasibility study;
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
    Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
    Development of design and estimate documentation (DED);
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
    Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
    Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of the feasibility study
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
    Other
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

    Other
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
    Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
    Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of the feasibility study
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
    Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
    Need for financing

    Does the project require additional funding for preparation?

    No
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]