Major renovation of part of the basement to provide the simplest shelter at Kherson Gymnasium No. 1 at the address: Kherson, Saints Cyril and Methodius Avenue, 17B


Sector
Education and science
Stream
Arrangement of civil defense protective structures (shelters) in secondary education institutions.
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project provides for  major repairs of the basement premises to arrange the simplest shelter with a total area of 412.20 sq. m (total area of the main premises -372.30 sq. m), in which conditions are created for the temporary stay of 300 children and teachers of a general secondary education institution in the event of a danger to their life and health as a result of emergency situations. The protective structure will be adapted for access and stay of low-mobility population groups. The spatial planning and constructive solutions, special and other engineering equipment, systems and life support means of the protective structure will comply with building codes and regulatory legal acts, and will provide a barrier-free adapted environment for children with special educational needs. The implementation of supply and exhaust ventilation is envisaged. Only LED lamps are used to illuminate the premises, some of which will be equipped with rechargeable batteries. The design took into account the level of lighting relevant to educational institutions. The arrangement of safe conditions for children to receive education will also be one of the incentives for residents to return to the city. The implementation of the project will provide benefits: reducing risks during the educational process, preserving the lives and health of children during the educational process in a face-to-face/blended learning format; reducing educational losses caused by distance learning; improving conditions for receiving high-quality safe educational services; reducing dissatisfaction of community residents with security conditions in educational institutions and available educational services, the arrangement of safe conditions for children to receive education will be one of the incentives for residents to return to the city.

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Creation of new facilities and services

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The construction of a civil defense shelter (the simplest shelter) for 300 people by overhauling part of the basement and equipping it in accordance with standardized requirements will ensure the protection of participants in the educational process and will contribute to the restoration of full-time / blended learning. The project provides for accessibility for children with special needs and low-mobility segments of the population. The construction of a safe educational space will contribute to the return of families with children to the city.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

Problem: Difficult security situation: risks to life and health. Solution: Arrangement of the simplest shelter for 300 people will allow to protect participants of the educational process and local residents in case of danger. Problem: Availability of only distance learning. Solution: Creating safe conditions in the institution will allow to return to full-time/blended learning, reduce the risks of educational losses. Additionally, the project will influence the creation of favorable conditions for families with children, the return of residents to the city.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of people who will use the service

300 human

Other functional

1 units

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Education and science

Subsector

School education

Stream

Arrangement of civil defense protective structures (shelters) in secondary education institutions.

Strategic document

State Strategy for Regional Development for 2021–2027

Task

Strategic goal 2 operational goal 1 task 21 Promoting the increase in the stock of civil defense protective structures, taking into account the principles of inclusiveness and accessibility

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value

Demand for the service and its dynamics

Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
300 human
Economic justification

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Arrangement of the simplest shelter ZZSO 1

Technical Solution 2

Modular shelter for ZZSO 1

Total costs5'267'190 UAH23'300'000 UAH
  • For preparation
  • 0 UAH100'000 UAH
  • For implementation
  • 5'267'190 UAH23'177'000 UAH
  • For operation
  • 0 UAH15'000 UAH
  • For closing
  • 0 UAH8'000 UAH
    Average annual costs100'000 UAH420'000 UAH
    Project duration, incl.4 months7 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
  • 1 month4 months
  • Implementation period
  • 3 months3 months
    Service life420 months600 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active
    Rejected
    Components of a technical solution
    To components
    1
    To components
    0

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget5'267'190 UAH23'300'000 UAH
    Capital costs5'267'190 UAH23'300'000 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation0 UAH100'000 UAH
    For implementation5'267'190 UAH23'177'000 UAH
    For operation0 UAH15'000 UAH
    For closing0 UAH8'000 UAH

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service UnitВартість улаштування найпростішого укриття (кап.ремонт)
    Service Unit Cost17'906'632 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?

    ResponseNoNo

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Funding Sources

    Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
    Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Economic Analysis
    Social benefits and costs
    Protection of the population, restoration of offline learning
    Environmental benefits and costs
    missing
    Indirect benefits and costs
    reducing the risks of educational losses