Major repairs of the transport channels and 4 locks: "Hromadsky", "105 km", "Zhelyavsky", "Skunda".


Sector
Environment
Stream
Ensuring protection from the harmful effects of water in settlements, industrial facilities and agricultural lands, creating safe living conditions for the population
Maturity level
57
Project Status
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SPP
Investment Feasibility Study
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project of major repairs of the transport and supply canals "Hromadsky", "105 km", "Zhelyavsky" together with the restoration of four eponymous regulating locks ("Hromadsky", "105 km", "Zhelyavsky", "Skunda") is a strategic infrastructure solution for the recovery of the ecosystem of the Danube Lakes. The main goal of the project is to large-scale restoration of the hydrological connection between the Danube River and inland water bodies, which is currently disrupted due to critical siltation of the channels and the emergency state of the locking mechanisms. Within the framework of the implementation, it is planned to clear the bottom of the channels from perennial silt deposits and aquatic vegetation to return them to the design parameters of depth and width, as well as perform a complex of general construction works on the locks, which includes concrete repair, replacement of worn metal gates and renewal of lifting mechanisms. The main problem that the project solves is the progressive degradation of water bodies: due to the low throughput of the channels, the lakes do not receive enough fresh water, which leads to their shallowing, a rapid increase in mineralization, "blooming" and mass death of fish. In addition to the environmental aspect, the project overcomes the shortage of resources for irrigated agriculture, which is critical for the food security of the region in the face of climate change. The expected results of the project implementation are the full restoration of managed water exchange, the reduction of water salinity in lakes to safe levels, the stabilization of water levels for the needs of agriculture and the fishing industry, as well as ensuring reliable protection of nearby territories from floods due to the proper operation of regulating structures.

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Contribution to climate or environmental goals

Secondary goal:

Improving the condition of infrastructure

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The main goal of the project is the comprehensive restoration of the hydrological regime and ecological state of the Danube lakes (in particular, the Katlabukh Yalpug-Kugurlui lakes) through major repairs of key transport arteries - the Hromadsky, 105 km, Zhelyavsky, and Skunda canals - and the restoration of the operational capacity of the regulating structures on them.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

The implementation of the project for the overhaul of the "Hromadsky", "105 km", "Zhelyavsky", "Skunda" canals and the corresponding locks is aimed at solving a critical set of problems that threaten the ecological and economic stability of the Danube region. As a result of the project, significant positive changes are expected, primarily the restoration of full-fledged controlled water exchange, which will allow reducing the level of water salinity to sanitary standards and ensuring a stable level of irrigation of lakes regardless of seasonal fluctuations in the Danube. The socio-economic effect will be manifested in guaranteed access of farmers to high-quality flood water, which stabilizes the yield and income of local communities. The environmental result will be the restoration of natural spawning grounds, improving the quality of water for domestic needs of the population and preserving the biodiversity of the Danube region. In addition, the overhaul will significantly save budget funds that are currently spent on energy-intensive forced pumping of water by pumping stations, since the restored infrastructure will ensure maximum use of cheap and environmentally friendly gravity filling.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Population in the geographical area of influence of the project

205 thous. people

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Environment

Subsector

Water protection, water management development, flood risk mitigation, centralized water supply, management, use and restoration of surface water resources

Stream

Ensuring protection from the harmful effects of water in settlements, industrial facilities and agricultural lands, creating safe living conditions for the population

Strategic document

Water Strategy of Ukraine until 2050

Task

1 Preparation and implementation of flood risk management plans in accordance with the legislation and provisions of Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
Length of resolved channels
12.7 km
12.7 km
Water transportation efficiency
75000000 m3
180000000 m3

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Проводилось опитування місцевих мешканців та фермерів.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
160000000 m3
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
2
170000000 m3
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
3
180000000 m3
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Major repairs of the transport channels and 4 locks: "Hromadsky", "105 km", "Zhelyavsky", "Skunda".

Technical Solution 2

Construction of pumping stations for forced recharge

Total costs57'320'000 UAH1'014'600'000 UAH
  • For preparation
  • 1'200'000 UAH2'500'000 UAH
  • For implementation
  • 55'820'000 UAH87'000'000 UAH
  • For operation
  • 300'000 UAH925'000'000 UAH
  • For closing
  • 0 UAH100'000 UAH
    Average annual costs1'900'000 UAH3'480'000 UAH
    Project duration, incl.36 months48 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
  • 12 months12 months
  • Implementation period
  • 24 months36 months
    Service life360 months300 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active

    [The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Rejected

    [The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Commercial Justification

    Supplier and contractor market assessment

    Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
    Yes, both national and international

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget57'320'000 UAH1'014'600'000 UAH
    Capital costs57'320'000 UAH1'014'600'000 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation1'200'000 UAH2'500'000 UAH
    For implementation55'820'000 UAH87'000'000 UAH
    For operation300'000 UAH925'000'000 UAH
    For closing0 UAH100'000 UAH
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service Unit105000
    Service Unit Cost543 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
    Is the project self-sustaining?No

    Availability of services

    Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
    No – analysis not performed

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Public-private partnership

    Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
    Yes, the project is suitable for PPP

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management Rationale

    Team competencies

    Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
    Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - demand analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
    Partially, we have limited experience

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
    None of the options are applicable
    Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
    No, I need help.

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Risk assessment

    Economic riskDefinedUndefined
    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

    Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?

    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?

    None of the options are applicable
    Need for financing

    Does the project require additional funding for preparation?

    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Approval History

    DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
    17/02/2026SP-N-170226-BBBDF3FAState SPPreliminary Investment Feasibility StudyCancellation of the decision to include in a joint ventureImportant project for the region (improving water exchange in the Danube lakes)-
    02/03/2026SP-N-020326-1F9664F8State SPPreliminary Investment Feasibility StudyInclude--
    26/02/2026SPP-N-260226-93FE66CFState SPPPreliminary Investment Feasibility StudyNot approvedAccording to the results of expert assessment-
    17/03/2026SPP-N-170326-CD054F59State SPPPreliminary Investment Feasibility StudyIncludeAccording to the minutes of the meeting of the Strategic Investment Council dated 12.03.2026 No. 1657