Restoration of the hydrotechnical infrastructure of the water regime regulation system of Lake Kitay (clearing of channels and modernization of the Kofa lock)


Sector
Environment
Stream
Ensuring protection from the harmful effects of water in settlements, industrial facilities and agricultural lands, creating safe living conditions for the population
Project Status
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SP
Investment Feasibility Study
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project involves restoring the hydrotechnical infrastructure of the water regime regulation system of Lake Kitay by clearing the 1.4 km long channel through Stepovy Island, clearing the 3.2 km long Kofa Channel with the dismantling of the remains of the former PK30 fish protection structure, as well as major repairs and modernization of the Kofa Lock. The project aims to restore the capacity of the channels, ensure effective regulation of the level and volume of water in the lake, including the possibility of timely and controlled filling of the lake with water resources from the Danube River, prevent flooding of nearby areas and degradation of the aquatic ecosystem.

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Improving the condition of infrastructure

Secondary goal:

Contribution to climate or environmental goals

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The goal of the project is to restore effective regulation of the water regime of Lake Kitay by modernizing hydraulic structures to ensure stable water exchange and controlled filling from the Danube River.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

The hydrotechnical infrastructure of the water regime regulation system of Lake Kitay is in a state of significant physical deterioration and has lost its design technical characteristics. Silting and overgrowing of the channels, as well as the deterioration of the Kofa lock, limit the possibility of effective water exchange with the Danube River and operational regulation of the water level in the lake. Further inaction may lead to: -progressive shallowing of the lake and degradation of its ecosystem; - deterioration of water quality and loss of fishery potential; - increased risk of flooding of agricultural lands and adjacent territories during periods of high water levels; - loss of control over water management processes at the local level. Given the strategic importance of the lake for the regional water management system, ensuring sustainable water exchange with the Danube is critically necessary for maintaining ecological balance, water security and socio-economic stability of the territory. The implementation of the project will allow restoring the functionality of hydraulic structures, ensuring predictive water resources management, and minimizing long-term environmental and economic risks.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Maintenance costs per year

500 thous. UAH

Number of people who will use the service

40 thous. people

Population in the geographical area of influence of the project

40 thous. people

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Environment

Subsector

Water protection, water management development, flood risk mitigation, centralized water supply, management, use and restoration of surface water resources

Stream

Ensuring protection from the harmful effects of water in settlements, industrial facilities and agricultural lands, creating safe living conditions for the population

Strategic document

Water Strategy of Ukraine until 2050

Task

1 Preparation and implementation of flood risk management plans in accordance with the legislation and provisions of Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks

Project objectives

Project objectives were not specified by the initiator

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

None of the options are applicable

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Mechanical clearing of 4.6 km of canals by excavators and complete replacement of the Kofa lock with a modern hydraulic structure

Technical Solution 2

Biological cleaning of canals (plant barriers, aquatic plants) and modernization of the existing lock

Total costs67'500'000 UAH41'500'000 UAH
  • For preparation
  • 1'000'000 UAH1'000'000 UAH
  • For implementation
  • 64'000'000 UAH30'000'000 UAH
  • For operation
  • 2'000'000 UAH10'000'000 UAH
  • For closing
  • 500'000 UAH500'000 UAH
    Average annual costs7'000'000 UAH500'000 UAH
    Project duration, incl.10 months11 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
  • 1 month2 months
  • Implementation period
  • 9 months9 months
    Service life120 months36 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Not defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active

    [The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Pending

    [The project initiator has not taken any decision about this alternative technical approach.]

    Commercial Justification

    Supplier and contractor market assessment

    Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
    Yes, both national and international

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget67'500'000 UAH41'500'000 UAH
    Capital costs67'500'000 UAH41'500'000 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation1'000'000 UAH1'000'000 UAH
    For implementation64'000'000 UAH30'000'000 UAH
    For operation2'000'000 UAH10'000'000 UAH
    For closing500'000 UAH500'000 UAH
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service Unit м3 води
    Service Unit Cost67 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
    Is the project self-sustaining?No

    Availability of services

    Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
    Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Public-private partnership

    Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
    No, no assessment was conducted.

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management Rationale

    Team competencies

    Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
    Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - economic analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - risk management

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of available procurement options

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - legal support

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial analysis - financial analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - demand analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - environmental expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
    No, this is the first project of its kind.

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
    None of the options are applicable
    Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
    No, I need help.

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Risk assessment

    Financial riskDefinedUndefined
    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

    Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?

    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?

    Development of a full feasibility study;
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Development of design and estimate documentation (DED);
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of the feasibility study
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Need for financing

    Does the project require additional funding for preparation?

    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Approval History

    DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
    14/02/2026SP-N-140226-9952A1F1State SPPreliminary Investment Feasibility StudyCancellation of the decision to include in a joint ventureAn important project for the region. The implementation of the project has an impact on the environment (improvement of water exchange in the Danube lakes)-
    02/03/2026SP-N-020326-F5C0AF2BState SPPreliminary Investment Feasibility StudyInclude--
    26/02/2026SPP-N-260226-CEB69AB5State SPPPreliminary Investment Feasibility StudyNot approvedAccording to the results of expert assessment-
    11/03/2026SPP-N-110326-9034B692State SPPPreliminary Investment Feasibility StudyNot approvedAccording to the results of expert assessment-