Restoration of the hydrotechnical infrastructure of the water regime regulation system of Lake Kitay (clearing of channels and modernization of the Kofa lock)
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
The project involves restoring the hydrotechnical infrastructure of the water regime regulation system of Lake Kitay by clearing the 1.4 km long channel through Stepovy Island, clearing the 3.2 km long Kofa Channel with the dismantling of the remains of the former PK30 fish protection structure, as well as major repairs and modernization of the Kofa Lock. The project aims to restore the capacity of the channels, ensure effective regulation of the level and volume of water in the lake, including the possibility of timely and controlled filling of the lake with water resources from the Danube River, prevent flooding of nearby areas and degradation of the aquatic ecosystem.
The purpose of the project
Main goal:
Improving the condition of infrastructure
Secondary goal:
Contribution to climate or environmental goals
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Maintenance costs per year
500 thous. UAH
Number of people who will use the service
40 thous. people
Population in the geographical area of influence of the project
40 thous. people
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Environment
Subsector
Water protection, water management development, flood risk mitigation, centralized water supply, management, use and restoration of surface water resources
Stream
Ensuring protection from the harmful effects of water in settlements, industrial facilities and agricultural lands, creating safe living conditions for the population
Strategic document
Water Strategy of Ukraine until 2050
Task
1 Preparation and implementation of flood risk management plans in accordance with the legislation and provisions of Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks
Project objectives
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
Mechanical clearing of 4.6 km of canals by excavators and complete replacement of the Kofa lock with a modern hydraulic structure
Technical Solution 2
Biological cleaning of canals (plant barriers, aquatic plants) and modernization of the existing lock
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
[The project initiator has not taken any decision about this alternative technical approach.]
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Preliminary cost breakdown
Average project cost per service recipient
Profitability of the project
Availability of services
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Public-private partnership
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Team competencies
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]