Overhaul of the hydroelectric complex on the Putylivka River (Zhobryn village, Klevan territorial community, Rivne district, Rivne region)


Sector
Environment
Stream
Ensuring protection from the harmful effects of water in settlements, industrial facilities and agricultural lands, creating safe living conditions for the population
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project involves major repairs of the hydroelectric complex on the Putylivka River within the village of Zhobryn, Klevansky territorial community, Rivne district, Rivne region. The purpose of the project is to restore the operability and increase the reliability of the hydraulic structure, which ensures the regulation of the water regime, protection of territories from flooding, and stable functioning of the water management infrastructure. Within the framework of the project, it is planned to restore and strengthen the structural elements of the hydroelectric complex, repair or replace water regulation equipment, clear the riverbed in the area of influence of the structure, and strengthen the banks. The implementation of measures will reduce the risks of flood flooding, improve the conditions for the use of reclaimed and agricultural lands, and ensure the safe operation of the facility in conditions of climate change. The project has important socio-economic and environmental significance for the community, contributes to increasing the level of water management security and sustainable development of the territory.

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Rebuilding the damaged/destroyed

Secondary goal:

Improving the condition of infrastructure

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

The main problem that the project aims to solve is the unsatisfactory technical condition of the hydroelectric complex on the Putylivka River, which limits the possibility of effective regulation of the water regime and creates increased risks of flooding of adjacent territories. Deterioration of structures and water-regulating equipment leads to loss of controllability of the structure and a decrease in its throughput capacity. As a result of the project, the technical serviceability of the hydroelectric complex will be restored, reliable and predictable regulation of water levels will be ensured, which will significantly reduce the risks of flood flooding of settlements and agricultural lands. Improving the throughput capacity and streamlining the riverbed will contribute to the stabilization of the hydrological regime and reducing erosion processes. Another important problem is the negative impact of climate change, in particular, an increase in the frequency of intense precipitation and periods of excessive moisture. The implementation of the project will increase the adaptive capacity of the water management infrastructure to such changes and ensure the safe operation of the structure in the long term. The result of the project will be an increase in the level of water management security of the territory, improvement of the conditions for the use of reclaimed and agricultural lands, as well as a reduction in socio-economic losses associated with flooding and degradation of water infrastructure

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Other functional

1000 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Environment

Subsector

Water protection, water management development, flood risk mitigation, centralized water supply, management, use and restoration of surface water resources

Stream

Ensuring protection from the harmful effects of water in settlements, industrial facilities and agricultural lands, creating safe living conditions for the population

Strategic document

Water Strategy of Ukraine until 2050

Task

1 Preparation and implementation of flood risk management plans in accordance with the legislation and provisions of Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
Extension of the period of safe operation of the hydroelectric power plant
0 year
30 year
Increasing the capacity of the hydroelectric complex during floods
153 m3
200 m3

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Оцінка попиту здійснювалася на основі аналізу фактичного стану водогосподарської інфраструктури, історичних даних про паводкові ситуації, наявних ризиків підтоплення територій, а також функціонального призначення гідровузла як елементу регулювання водного режиму та захисту територій.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
1000 human
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
There are risks of impaired mobility or safety for women, men and other gender groups during construction/operation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Economic analysis of the project of major repairs and modernization of the hydraulic structure.docx
13.02.2026
21:07:58 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

MAJOR REPAIR OF AN EXISTING HYDRAULIC UNIT

Technical Solution 2

CURRENT REPAIR WITHOUT COMPLETE RECONSTRUCTION

Total costs8'600'000 UAH5'600'000 UAH
  • For preparation
  • 500'000 UAH500'000 UAH
  • For implementation
  • 8'000'000 UAH5'000'000 UAH
  • For operation
  • 100'000 UAH100'000 UAH
    Average annual costs100'000 UAH100'000 UAH
    Project duration, incl.18 months14 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
  • 6 months2 months
  • Implementation period
  • 12 months12 months
    Service life360 months360 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active

    [The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Rejected

    [The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Components of a technical solution
    To components
    0
    To components
    0

    Commercial Justification

    Supplier and contractor market assessment

    Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
    Yes, only national

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget8'600'000 UAH5'600'000 UAH
    Capital costs8'600'000 UAH5'600'000 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation500'000 UAH500'000 UAH
    For implementation8'000'000 UAH5'000'000 UAH
    For operation100'000 UAH100'000 UAH
    For closing0 UAH0 UAH
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service UnitКапітальний ремонт гідровузла
    Service Unit Cost8'000'000 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo

    Availability of services

    Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
    No – analysis not performed

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Funding Sources

    Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
    Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH

    Public-private partnership

    Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
    Yes, the project is not suitable for PPP

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management Rationale

    Team competencies

    Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
    Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - economic analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - risk management

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - social and gender analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - public consultations

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of available procurement options

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - legal support

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial analysis - financial analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - demand analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of the market environment

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
    No, this is the first project of its kind.

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
    Strategic justification - forming a justification for the problem and need

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - environmental expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - economic analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
    Partially, we are considering options

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Risk assessment

    Environmental riskDefinedUndefined
    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

    Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

    None of the options are applicable

    Project Approval History

    DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
    17/02/2026SP-N-170226-60AD30CBState SPInvestment Feasibility StudyCancellation of the decision to include in a joint venture--
    02/03/2026SP-N-020326-A2858DA9State SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
    26/02/2026SPP-N-260226-31C8B5A1State SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyNot approvedAccording to the results of expert assessment-
    11/03/2026SPP-N-110326-AED2FA09State SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyNot approvedAccording to the results of expert assessment-