Reconstruction of a water pipe with a diameter of 500 mm along Myru Avenue from P. Myrny Street to Starokostyantynivske Highway in Khmelnytskyi
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Development and modernization of water supply systems
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion
- Preparation
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
General information
Description of the project
Design and estimate documentation has been prepared, and a project expertise has been performed for the water supply section from Panas Myrny Street to Starokostyantynivskoho Shosse. The project provides for the construction of a pipeline of polyethylene pressure pipes with a length of 1354 m.p. and the installation of 16 water supply wells. The water supply will be laid both by open method through green areas and by horizontal directional drilling at intersections with roads, driveways and driveways.
The purpose of the project
Main goal:
Improving the condition of infrastructure
Secondary goal:
Improving the quality of services
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
The water supply along Prospect Myru of the city of Khmelnytsky was built in 1973 from steel pipes with a diameter of 500 mm, the standard service life of which is up to 20 years. This water supply runs at a great depth and today has fully exhausted its operational and technical resource and is considered emergency. It provides centralized water supply to the population and industry along Prospect Myru and adjacent streets, microdistricts Vystavka, Ozerna.
Every year there are 5-6 emergency situations. During the elimination of accidents, it is necessary to stop the water supply, and accordingly, the drainage, of a large part of the city.
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
The water supply along Prospect Myru of the city of Khmelnytsky was built in 1973 from steel pipes with a diameter of 500 mm, the standard service life of which is up to 20 years. This water supply runs at a great depth and today has fully exhausted its operational and technical resource and is considered emergency. It provides centralized water supply to the population and industry along Prospect Myru and adjacent streets, microdistricts Vystavka, Ozerna.
Every year there are 5-6 emergency situations. During the elimination of accidents, it is necessary to stop the water supply, and accordingly, the drainage, of a large part of the city.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Number of people who will use the service
50 thous. people
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Subsector
Water supply and sanitation
Stream
Development and modernization of water supply systems
Strategic document
Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади
Task
B.2 Smart urban planning and infrastructure
Project objectives
Project objectives were not specified by the initiator
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
Reconstruction of a water pipe with a diameter of 500 mm along Myru Avenue from P. Myrny Street to Starokostyantynivske Highway in Khmelnytskyi
Technical Solution 2
Construction of a water pipeline with a diameter of 500 mm on Myru Avenue in Khmelnytskyi
Total costs19'523'481 UAH30'168'400 UAH
Average annual costs10'000 UAH1'000 UAH
Project duration, incl.6 months15 months
Service life600 months600 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, both national and international
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget19'523'481 UAH30'168'400 UAH
Capital costs19'523'481 UAH30'168'400 UAH
Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH
Preliminary cost breakdown
Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
For preparation0 UAH150'000 UAH
For implementation19'505'110 UAH30'000'000 UAH
For operation0 UAH0 UAH
For closing18'371 UAH18'400 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service UnitВодопостачання з 1 м3 для населення
Service Unit Cost14 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?
ResponseNoNo
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Yes – the analysis was conducted, it was found that the tariffs correspond to the financial capabilities of consumers
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management Rationale
Team competencies
Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - economic analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - social and gender analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic feasibility study - technical expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of available procurement options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - demand analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - environmental expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of the market environment
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Risk assessment
Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasons
23/02/2026SP-L-230226-EBC6F17ECommunity SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-
25/02/2026SPP-L-250226-A1AE18EDCommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-