Reconstruction of railway transport infrastructure facilities on the Korolevo - Khust section in the Transcarpathian region.
Sector
Transport Sector
Stream
Ensuring the sustainable functioning of railway transport by restoring, modernizing and developing the infrastructure of 1435 mm and 1520 mm standards, damaged facilities and implementing technological solutions for the safety and continuity of transportation, as well as reconstructing stations to create a barrier-free environment
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SP
Implementation
Completion
- Preparation
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
General information
Description of the project
The project involves the reconstruction of railway infrastructure, namely: railway tracks and switches, roadbed, reconstruction of centralization and blocking signaling devices, communications, as well as the reconstruction of existing artificial structures on the site.
The purpose of the project
Main goal:
Improving the quality of services
Secondary goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards, Increasing compliance with modern standards, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Introducing innovations and energy-efficient solutions
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
The implementation of the specified infrastructure project will significantly reduce the load on highways, optimize logistics costs, increase the competitiveness of Ukrainian products on European markets and ensure balanced development of the Transcarpathian region. At the same time, the implementation of this project will contribute to the improvement of railway connections, increasing the throughput capacity between Ukraine and the countries of the European Union.
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
Lack of a railway network of the European standard of 1435 mm, non-compliance of the existing railway infrastructure with European Union standards. Reconstruction of the existing railway infrastructure in accordance with EU standards. The project will lead to improvement of freight and potentially passenger transportation across the border of Ukraine, in particular, reducing the time required for technical processing of trains between Ukraine and EU countries and, thus, increasing cross-border throughput.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Other functional
17.8 km
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Transport Sector
Subsector
Railway transport
Stream
Ensuring the sustainable functioning of railway transport by restoring, modernizing and developing the infrastructure of 1435 mm and 1520 mm standards, damaged facilities and implementing technological solutions for the safety and continuity of transportation, as well as reconstructing stations to create a barrier-free environment
Strategic document
National Transport Strategy of Ukraine until 2030
Task
1 Ensuring the stability and survivability of Ukraine's transport infrastructure against acts of aggression and negative man-made phenomena by developing main and alternative logistics routes, implementing electronic systems with a high degree of protection, etc.
Project objectives
Indicator
Base value
Target value
Improving railway connections, increasing throughput between Ukraine and the countries of the European Union.
0 km
17.8 km
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Demand for the service and its dynamics
What methodology was used to estimate demand?
Прогноз попиту та економічні показники будуть визначені в техніко-економічному обгрунтуванні
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
300000 t
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?
Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?
None of the options are applicable
Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?
All possible positive impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
All possible negative impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?
A policy/code of conduct on non-discrimination and gender equality has been developed
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Mandatory training for project staff on gender equality and inclusion is provided
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Not provided for by the project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
Reconstruction of railway transport infrastructure facilities on the Korolevo - Khust section in the Transcarpathian region.
Technical Solution 2
Reconstruction of railway transport infrastructure facilities
Total costs820'800'002 UAH1'750'130'000 UAH
Average annual costs80'000 UAH100'000 UAH
Project duration, incl.36 months48 months
Service life240 months240 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, both national and international
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
При необхідності закупівлі товарів робіт і послуг будуть проводитись відкриті конкурентні торги відповідно до вимог чинного законодавства з урахуванням норм міжнародного права
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
Проведення відкритих конкурентних торгів через електронну систему публічних закупівель, публікація тендерної документації, роз’яснень та протоколів оцінки, рівний доступ до інформації для всіх учасників. Антикорупційні застереження у договорах. Внутрішній та зовнішній аудит.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
Open competitive bidding
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pre-market engagement
Було проведено аналіз аналогічних інфраструктурних проєктів
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Potential market participants
У межах підготовки проєкту реконструкції залізничної інфраструктури проведено оцінку та визначено наявності достатньої кількості кваліфікованих учасників, оцінено технічних можливостей, уточнено інноваційні рішення у сфері сигналізації, електрифікації, оцінено потенційний ризик реалізації проєкту.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Market readiness assessment
На національному рівні присутні спеціалізовані будівельно-монтажні організації та профільні підприємства, що мають досвід з проведення робіт з реконструкції об'єктів залізничної інфраструктури. Існує достатня кількість інженерних компаній у сфері проєктування, СЦБ, електрифікації та енергопостачання.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget820'800'002 UAH1'750'130'000 UAH
Capital costs820'800'002 UAH1'750'130'000 UAH
Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH
Preliminary cost breakdown
Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
For preparation31'500'000 UAH250'000'000 UAH
For implementation789'300'000 UAH1'500'000'000 UAH
For operation1 UAH80'000 UAH
For closing1 UAH50'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service UnitРеконструкція залізничної інфраструктури
Service Unit Cost789'300'000 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Is the project self-sustaining?No
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
No – analysis not performed
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management Rationale
Team competencies
Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - economic analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - communication with stakeholders
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - risk management
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - social and gender analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - public consultations
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic feasibility study - technical expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of available procurement options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - legal support
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial analysis - financial analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - demand analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - environmental expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of the market environment
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Partially, we have limited experience
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
Technical experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Risk assessment
Technical riskDefinedUndefined
Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Other riskDefinedUndefined
Organizational events
ResponseDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Need for financing
Does the project require additional funding for preparation?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasons
18/02/2026SP-N-180226-82B1798DState SPInvestment Feasibility StudyCancellation of the decision to include in a joint venture-
02/03/2026SP-N-020326-E513E813State SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-
26/02/2026SPP-N-260226-D352CD10State SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyNot approvedAccording to the results of expert assessment