Construction of a transformer substation for power supply to the residential area for participants in the Anti-Terrorist Operation/Joint Forces Operation in Slavutych, Vyshgorod District, Kyiv Region


Sector
Energy Sector
Stream
Energy infrastructure and energy efficiency
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project involves the construction of a new transformer substation to electrify the promising Dobryninsky residential district in Slavutych, which is intended for development by participants in the Anti-Terrorist Operation/Joint Forces Operation and their families. Currently, the development of the area is critically limited by a lack of power: the existing networks are only capable of supplying about 50 households, which makes further construction and settlement of the territory impossible.

The technical solution involves the installation of a complete transformer substation (CTS) with two power transformers, each with a capacity of 630 kVA (2x630 kVA). The implementation of the project will create the necessary power reserve, which will allow increasing the number of connected subscribers from the current 50 to 400 private houses, which will give impetus to the full development of the neighborhood and provide housing for the families of Ukraine's defenders. 

The purpose of the project

Main Goal:

Developing new territories or functions

Secondary Goal:

Capacity building, Improving the equality of wealth distribution

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The main objective of the project is to ensure adequate infrastructure capacity for the full development and settlement of the new Dobryninsky residential district in Slavutych. This area is of significant social importance, as the land plots here were allocated by the state to combatants, ATO/OOS veterans, and their families as a guarantee of social protection. At present, there is a critical gap between the current state and the target level of development of the area, as only about 50 households out of more than 400 allocated plots are actually connected to the power supply and developed. The existing energy infrastructure has exhausted its resources and is technically unable to accommodate new connections, effectively blocking the possibility for 350 families of defenders to start building their own homes. The goal will be achieved through the construction of a new complete walk-through transformer substation with the installation of two power transformers, each with a capacity of 630 kVA. The implementation of this technical solution will eliminate the power shortage, integrate the new substation into the city's existing high-voltage network, and ensure a stable distribution of electricity to all 400 prospective sites. As a result of the project, the wasteland will be transformed into a full-fledged residential area, providing comfortable living conditions for more than 1,200 community residents and restoring social justice for military families.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

The main problem that the project aims to solve is the critical lack of energy infrastructure in the Dobryninsky residential district, which makes it impossible to build and populate it. Today, more than 350 families of ATO/OOS participants who have received land plots in accordance with state guarantees are physically unable to start building their own homes due to the lack of access to the power grid. The existing local networks have exhausted their capacity, are operating at the limit of overload, and are only capable of supplying power to 50 existing houses. As a result, the territory remains undeveloped wasteland, the development of the city is stalled, and social tensions are growing among veterans due to the inability to exercise their legal right to housing. The implementation of the project and the construction of a new 2x630 kVA transformer substation will completely resolve these issues. The main result will be the elimination of the power shortage and the creation of a reliable connection point for 400 private households. This will instantly unblock the process of individual construction: the families of defenders will be able to fully develop their plots and build houses. As a result, instead of a neglected area, the city will receive a new, electrified residential area where more than 1,200 residents will be able to live in comfortable conditions. In addition, the launch of the new substation will relieve the load on the existing outdated networks, ensuring stable voltage and reliable services for all consumers in this microdistrict.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of people who will use the service

1200 human

Number of IDPs in the geographical area of impact of the project

1325 human

Population in the geographical area of influence of the project

18247 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Energy Sector

Subsector

Electric power industry

Stream

Energy infrastructure and energy efficiency

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

5 Implementation of distributed generation

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
Installed transformer capacity to power the quarter
0 kW
1260 kW
Number of households with access to electricity
50 units
400 units

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Оцінка попиту здійснювалася у два етапи. 1. Документально-демографічний етап: на основі рішень міської ради та генплану підраховано точну кількість сформованих земельних ділянок (400 од.) та спрогнозовано кількість майбутніх споживачів. 2. Інженерно-технічний етап: на основі зафіксованої кількості домогосподарств проведено розрахунок необхідної електричної потужності. Застосовано нормативний метод розрахунку згідно з ДБН В.2.5-23:2010 «Проєктування електрообладнання об'єктів цивільного призначення». Розрахункове навантаження визначалося шляхом множення кількості ділянок на нормативний показник питомої потужності для будинків (з урахуванням сучасного тренду на електроопалення) із застосуванням коефіцієнтів попиту та одночасності. Результатом розрахунку стала сумарна потреба у 1260 кВА, що технічно обґрунтовує вибір трансформаторів саме такої потужності.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
350 units
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
financial_analysis_transformers.docx
13.03.2026
09:45:40 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Installation of a complete transformer substation (CTS) with two power transformers with a capacity of 630 kVA each (2x630 kVA)

Technical Solution 2

Installation of a single-transformer complete substation with a capacity of 1250 kVA (KTP 1x1250 kVA)

Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)6'200'000 UAH3'950'000 UAH
For preparation200'000 UAH150'000 UAH
For implementation6'000'000 UAH3'800'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost200'000 UAH230'000 UAH
For operation100'000 UAH150'000 UAH
For closing100'000 UAH80'000 UAH
Average annual costs100'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.12 months122 months
Deadline for developing a FFS2 months2 months
Implementation period10 months120 months
Service life360 months360 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active

[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Rejected

[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Components of a technical solution
To components
0
To components
0

Commercial Justification

Supplier and contractor market assessment

Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial justification

Total project budget

Total preliminary budget6'400'000 UAH4'180'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)6'200'000 UAH3'950'000 UAH
For preparation200'000 UAH150'000 UAH
For implementation6'000'000 UAH3'800'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost200'000 UAH230'000 UAH
For operation100'000 UAH150'000 UAH
For closing100'000 UAH80'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Average project cost per service recipient

Service Unit1 мешканець території забудови
Service Unit Cost13'500 UAH

Profitability of the project

Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo

Availability of services

Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Financing Mechanisms

Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

Source and MechanismYesNo

Funding Sources

Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH

Public-private partnership

Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Management Rationale

Team competencies

Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - economic analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - communication with stakeholders

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - risk management

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - social and gender analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - public consultations

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of available procurement options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - legal support

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial analysis - financial analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - demand analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - environmental expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of the market environment

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Risk assessment

Technical riskDefinedUndefined
Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Political riskDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

None of the options are applicable

Project Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
31/03/2026SP-L-310326-6900C267Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--