Installation of a gas-fired power plant up to 20 MW in Lviv region: Project FIV


Sector
Energy Sector
Stream
Construction of new generating capacities
Maturity level
80
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

Within the framework of the power generation project, Ukrnafta has demonstrated significant progress in the implementation of the emergency distributed energy generation project (Stage I):

  • Locations have been agreed and permission has been obtained from local state administration bodies for the placement of installed capacities of 70 MW, including gas piston units, in Lviv, Poltava and Cherkasy regions;
  • A loan of EUR 80 million has been secured from the EBRD for the implementation of the project. The loan agreement has been signed, and the procedure for purchasing equipment on the EBRD platform is ongoing. The state guarantee to secure the loan has been confirmed.

Project Installation of a gas-fired power plant of up to 20 MW in Lviv region: Project IV (hereinafter - the Project)

Rationale:

The energy shortage in Ukraine due to Russian attacks has been critical, leading to significant disruptions in the country's energy sector. The attacks have led to the loss of electricity, heating and other critical services. More than 40% of Ukraine's energy infrastructure, or more than 1,000 energy facilities, has been damaged or destroyed since the beginning of the Russian invasion in February 2022, in particular as a result of missile and drone attacks targeting power plants, substations and the power grid. According to various estimates, this has led to the loss of about 8 GW of generating capacity. Daily power outages have affected millions of Ukrainians and businesses, with some regions experiencing power outages lasting up to 12 hours a day or even longer at times. Estimates of the cost of restoring power facilities range up to $5 billion. In line with the above challenges, supported by its own gas production capacity, Ukrnafta has decided to develop power generation capacity. The Wärtsilä gas piston plant technologies planned for this project are well suited for flexible modes with frequent starts and stops, and can therefore effectively cooperate with renewable energy installations and provide system services. Thus, gas-fired power plants can also provide so-called auxiliary services for balancing the power system, in particular during hours of no wind (for wind power plants) or lack of sunlight (for solar power plants).

During the implementation of the capacity expansion project for the Support of Critically Necessary Distributed Generation of the Stage  in the Lviv region, it is expected to install an additional gas-fired power plant manufactured by Wärtsilä with a capacity of up to 20 MW manufactured by the Finnish company Wartsila Finland Oy at the own production site of JSC «Ukrnafta».

The gas-fired power plant will operate on gas to produce and supply electricity to meet the strategic enterprise's own needs and sell it on the «day-ahead market» (DAM) in peak load mode by providing additional services to NPP «Ukrenergo». In addition to generating additional income for PJSC "Ukrnafta" from the sale of electricity, the project is designed to ensure the supply of additional electricity to the Unified Electricity System of Ukraine.

Expected production volume:

The implementation of the project will allow providing an additional 113-140 GWh annually (depending on the operating mode) for the network.

Completion level

Since the Project is an expansion stage of the "Support of Critically Necessary Distributed Generation", the current status of the main project is as follows:

  • Land plots with optimal conditions and access to the necessary networks were selected from JSC "Ukrnafta"'s own production sites;
  • Most of the technical specifications have been finally agreed and secured. Financing from the EBRD has been successfully received;
  • Financing for the procurement of EPC works for design, installation and commissioning has been successfully received from the EBRD, the tender process for the procurement of EPC works has been launched through the EBRD e-procurement platform;
  • Financing for the procurement of the GPU has been agreed with the Finnish side of the FUIF.

The total estimated budget of the project is UAH 812.9 million excluding VAT (excluding the cost of EPC works for installation and commissioning).

Financed: equipment (GPU), 100% (as financing from the FUIF funds)Planned form of investment: Mixed form of investment attraction – soft loan financing, own funds.

The implementation of the Project (Stage IV) is subject to receiving support from the Finnish-Ukrainian Investment Fund (FUIF).

Technical solution

Wärtsilä can be considered as the supplier of the main equipment - a gas piston unit - for this project. The company's track record includes 79 GW of power plant capacity in 180 countries around the world, and Wärtsilä is the oldest original equipment supplier (OEM) for power plants with spark ignition and piston engines since 1992. Its cogeneration units are characterized by high efficiency, reliability and flexibility in using different types of fuel, which is a decisive factor for energy projects. Wartsila technologies ensure optimal fuel use, reducing operating costs and CO₂ emissions, which meets modern environmental standards. In addition, their engines have fast start-up times, which increases the stability and flexibility of energy systems. Wartsila has extensive experience in implementing similar projects around the world, including industrial cogeneration plants and district heating solutions. Their technical support and network of service centers help minimize operational risks and ensure stable operation of the equipment throughout its entire life cycle. All these factors made Wartsila the optimal choice for our projects.

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Capacity building

Secondary goal:

Contribution to climate or environmental goals, Increasing compliance with modern standards, Increasing compliance with modern standards, Creation of new facilities and services, Developing new territories or functions, Rebuilding the damaged/destroyed, Improving the equality of wealth distribution, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Introducing innovations and energy-efficient solutions, Creation of new jobs through project implementation, Поява нових виробничих потужностей, Reducing territorial or social gaps, Meeting demand

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

During the implementation of the capacity expansion project to Support Critically Needed Distributed Generation Stage V in Lviv region, an additional gas piston unit manufactured by Wärtsilä with a capacity of up to 20 MW is expected to be installed at the own production site of JSC Ukrnafta. The key objectives of the project are: • increase in the power generating capacity of the UES-U; • increase in the sustainability of the UES-U;

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

The main beneficiaries of the project implementation: 1. Local communities – Residents of the region will have access to a stable and secure energy supply, which will reduce the risk of power outages, especially in the winter months. As of January 1, 2021, the population of Ivano-Frankivsk region was ≈1,361.1 thousand people, many of whom included children and the elderly, who may be vulnerable to energy shortages due to dependence on centralized heating and limited access to autonomous energy sources. 2. Critical infrastructure – Reliable energy supply will support hospitals, schools, emergency services and utilities, ensuring their uninterrupted operation. The Ivano-Frankivsk region has a network of accredited healthcare facilities, which includes at least more than 50 institutions that provide medical care to the population of all ages. These facilities require a stable power and heat supply to ensure uninterrupted operation of departments, provision of emergency medical care, diagnostics, treatment of patients and support for vulnerable groups of the population, especially in conditions of energy risks. 3. Enterprises and industries - Energy security is important for local enterprises, helping them to maintain operations, avoid disruptions and contribute to economic growth. Reliable energy supply will increase productivity and support regional economic stability. Vulnerable groups and social impact Main beneficiaries of the project implementation: 1. Local communities - Residents of the region will have access to a stable and secure energy supply, which will reduce the risk of power outages, especially during the winter months. ○ As of 2021, the population of Lviv region was 746 thousand people, including 111.8 thousand children (age 0-14) and 118 thousand elderly residents (age 65+), many of whom are vulnerable to energy shortages. 2. Critical infrastructure – A reliable power supply will support hospitals, schools, emergency services and utilities, ensuring their uninterrupted operation. ○ There are 35 accredited healthcare facilities in Lviv region, all of which require a stable power supply and heating to provide necessary medical care. 3. Enterprises and industries – Energy security is important for local businesses, helping them to maintain operations, avoid disruptions and promote economic growth. A reliable power supply will increase productivity and support regional economic stability. Vulnerable Groups and Social Impact The project will provide direct benefits to groups most affected by energy insecurity, including: ● Older people – Ensuring access to heating and electricity, especially for those living alone or in care facilities. ● Low-income households – Reducing the risk of energy poverty and improving overall living conditions. ● People with disabilities – Ensuring uninterrupted access to essential services, including health facilities, rehabilitation centers, and assistive technologies. ● Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) – Many displaced families have been displaced to these regions due to war and are in need of stable housing conditions with reliable access to energy. To ensure equitable energy distribution and targeted support, the project will implement a data collection system that: ● Tracks uptime data, measuring the reliability of electricity and heat supply to ensure uninterrupted service to critical facilities and communities. ● Uses analytical data to shape future energy planning and social policies, aligning it with international best practices on energy equity and inclusion.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of jobs, including for IDPs

17 workplaces

Population in the geographical area of influence of the project

746 thous. people

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Energy Sector

Subsector

Electric power industry

Stream

Construction of new generating capacities

Strategic document

Energy Strategy of Ukraine until 2050

Task

Creation of new generating capacities to ensure the reliability of energy supply, increase energy security and sustainable development of the energy system of Ukraine

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
Annual electricity production
150000 MWh
153000 MWh
Annual revenue from the sale of electricity
900 mln UAH
925 mln UAH

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Для визначення попиту на електроенергію та теплову енергію застосовано методику прогнозування на основі: статистичного аналізу динаміки споживання за попередні роки (дані ДП «Оператор ринку», НЕК «Укренерго», Держстат України); кореляції з температурними режимами та середньорічними показниками втрат;
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
2546000 MWh
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
2
2597000 MWh
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
3
2649000 MWh
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
4
2702000 MWh
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
5
2756000 MWh
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?

Yes, not yet conducted
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Other benefits from project implementation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Envisaged training or advanced training for women in the private sector
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?

Focus groups or consultations with women and vulnerable groups were held
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Feedback on the project design was received from organizations working with women
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Women's participation is ensured at various stages of planning (including public hearings)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?

All possible positive impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
A plan to mitigate negative social impacts focused on women has been developed
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The percentage of women who will gain new educational/professional opportunities is quantified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
All possible negative impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?

A policy/code of conduct on non-discrimination and gender equality has been developed
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
A gender specialist/advisor is included in the project management structure
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Mandatory training for project staff on gender equality and inclusion is provided
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
F4.pdf
09.03.2026
15:26:03 UTC
OFM BRs20F.pdf
09.03.2026
15:32:18 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Installation of a gas-fired power plant with a capacity of up to 20 MW

Technical Solution 2

Construction of a 41.5 MW solar power plant

Total costs1'525'133'169 UAH1'526'000'000 UAH
  • For preparation
  • 196'934'708 UAH76'300'000 UAH
  • For implementation
  • 1'328'198'459 UAH1'390'000'000 UAH
  • For operation
  • 1 UAH10'200'000 UAH
  • For closing
  • 1 UAH49'500'000 UAH
    Average annual costs408'551'520 UAH10'200'000 UAH
    Project duration, incl.24 months18 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
  • 9 months6 months
  • Implementation period
  • 15 months12 months
    Service life240 months360 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active

    [The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Rejected

    [The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Components of a technical solution
    To components
    2
    To components
    0

    Commercial Justification

    Supplier and contractor market assessment

    Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
    Yes, both national and international

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
    Для реалізації проєкту обрано стратегію багатоступеневих відкритих закупівель через систему ProZorro з попереднім залученням ринку. Такий підхід забезпечує максимальну прозорість, конкурентність і дозволяє обрати найбільш економічно вигідну пропозицію, враховуючи масштабність і складність проєкту. Використання міжнародних стандартів тендерних процедур дає змогу залучити як українських, так і іноземних постачальників, мінімізуючи ризики зриву строків постачання обладнання чи виконання робіт

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
    Specify the tools and mechanisms that will ensure transparency of procedures (e.g. ProZorro, independent oversight, public reporting) and quality control of procurement.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
    Open competitive bidding

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Other

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Competitive dialogue

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Direct negotiation procedures

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Pre-market engagement
    Попереднє вивчення ринку здійснювалося шляхом: аналізу відкритих тендерів у ProZorro; консультацій з галузевими експертами; аналізу реалізованих аналогічних проєктів в Україні та ЄС; запитів до потенційних виробників і постачальників. Це дозволило сформувати реалістичні очікування щодо строків постачання, вартості та технічних параметрів обладнання

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Potential market participants
    Очікується участь: міжнародних виробників основного електричного обладнання, у відповідності до вимог пільгового фінансування ФУІФ. Рівень конкуренції серед виробників обладнання оцінюється як низький, оскільки на ринку присутня обмежена кількість Фінських виробників. Рівень конкуренції серед будівельно-монтажних компаній оцінюється як помірний, оскільки на ринку присутні декілька сильних гравців, готових до реалізації проєктів такого масштабу

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Market readiness assessment
    Очікується участь: міжнародних виробників основного електричного обладнання, у відповідності до вимог пільгового фінансування ФУІФ. Рівень конкуренції серед виробників обладнання оцінюється як низький, оскільки на ринку присутня обмежена кількість Фінських виробників. Рівень конкуренції серед будівельно-монтажних компаній оцінюється як помірний, оскільки на ринку присутні декілька сильних гравців, готових до реалізації проєктів такого масштабу

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget1'525'133'169 UAH1'526'000'000 UAH
    Capital costs1'525'133'169 UAH1'526'000'000 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation196'934'708 UAH76'300'000 UAH
    For implementation1'328'198'459 UAH1'390'000'000 UAH
    For operation1 UAH10'200'000 UAH
    For closing1 UAH49'500'000 UAH
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service UnitСередня вартість на 1 кВт·год (за весь строк), грн/кВт·год
    Service Unit Cost1 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?YesNo
    Is the project self-sustaining?Yes
    Has the financial condition of the potential beneficiary been assessed in accordance with the order of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine dated 14.07.2016 No. 616?
    Yes
    NPV Value1'111'500 UAH

    Availability of services

    Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
    Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Funding Sources

    Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
    Expected Funds1'525'133'169 UAH0 UAH

    Public-private partnership

    Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
    The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management Rationale

    Team competencies

    Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
    Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - economic analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - communication with stakeholders

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - risk management

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of available procurement options

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - legal support

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial analysis - financial analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - demand analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of the market environment

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
    Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
    Economic justification - social and gender analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management rationale - public consultation

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - environmental expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
    Partially, we are considering options

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
    Specialists in interaction with international financial organizations (IFOs)

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Environmental experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial consultants/modelers

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Legal consultants

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Commercial experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic analysts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic consultants

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Technical experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Social/gender consultants

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management experts / project managers

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Risk assessment

    Technical riskDefinedUndefined
    Financial riskDefinedUndefined
    Economic riskDefinedUndefined
    Political riskDefinedUndefined
    Social riskDefinedUndefined
    Operational riskDefinedUndefined
    Market riskDefinedUndefined
    Environmental riskDefinedUndefined

    Organizational events

    ResponseDefinedUndefined
    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

    Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?

    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?

    None of the options are applicable

    Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

    None of the options are applicable
    Need for financing

    Does the project require additional funding for preparation?

    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Approval History

    DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
    09/03/2026SP-N-090326-A0A5F6CAState SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
    17/03/2026SPP-N-170326-03A9BDFEState SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeAccording to the minutes of the meeting of the Strategic Investment Council dated 12.03.2026 No. 1680