Installation of a gas-fired power plant up to 20 MW in Ivano-Frankivsk region: Project FIII


Sector
Energy Sector
Stream
Construction of new generating capacities
Maturity level
85
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

Within the framework of the implementation of the distributed electricity generation development program of JSC «Ukrnafta», significant progress has been made in implementing the emergency distributed electricity generation project (Stage I).

In particular, the company has agreed on the placement and received permits from local governments to install gas-fired power plants with a total capacity of about 70 MW at production sites in Lviv, Poltava and Cherkasy regions.

To implement this program, financing from the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) in the amount of 80 million euros has been attracted. The loan agreement has been signed, and the equipment is being purchased in accordance with EBRD procedures through the bank's electronic procurement system. A state guarantee of Ukraine has been provided to secure the loan.

Within the framework of the expansion of the distributed generation program, it is planned to implement Project III – installation of a gas-fired power plant with a capacity of up to 20 MW in Ivano-Frankivsk region (hereinafter - Project)

Justification of the need for the implementation of the project

After the start of the full-scale invasion of the Russian Federation in 2022, Ukraine's energy infrastructure suffered extensive destruction. Massive missile and drone attacks were directed at power plants, substations and power grid infrastructure facilities.

According to estimates by state authorities and international partners, more than 1,000 energy infrastructure facilities were damaged or destroyed, which led to the loss of more than 40% of the country's generating capacity, or about 8 GW of installed capacity.

This resulted in significant power supply disruptions for the population and industry. In many regions of Ukraine, planned and emergency power outages lasting up to 10-12 hours per day have been used for a long time.

The restoration of damaged energy facilities requires significant investments, which, according to various estimates, may exceed 5 billion US dollars.

Taking into account the above challenges, as well as the availability of its own natural gas resource base, JSC "Ukrnafta" made a strategic decision to develop the direction of electricity production by creating distributed generating capacities at its own production sites.

The essence of the project

The project involves the installation of a gas-fired power plant with a capacity of up to 20 MW at one of the production sites of JSC "Ukrnafta" in Ivano-Frankivsk region.

The project plans to install a gas-piston plant manufactured by Wärtsilä (Finland). The equipment will operate on natural gas, in particular gas produced by the company itself. The power plant will provide:

  • electricity generation to cover the company's own needs;
  • electricity sales on the "day-ahead" market (RDN);
  • participation in the mechanisms of balancing the power system and providing auxiliary services to NPC «Ukrenergo».

Thanks to the high maneuverability of gas-piston units, the station will be able to operate effectively in variable load modes and quickly respond to fluctuations in demand in the power system.

Expected results

The implementation of the project will ensure additional electricity production in the amount of 110-140 GWh per year, depending on the operating mode of the power plant.

The commissioning of the station will contribute to:

  • increasing the energy stability of the Unified Power System of Ukraine;
  • increasing the volume of distributed generation;
  • reducing electricity shortage during peak consumption periods;
  • increasing energy security of industrial enterprises.

Current implementation status

The project is part of the next stage of the program "Support for critically needed distributed generation".

The following preparatory measures have been completed to date:

  • optimal land plots have been identified at the own production sites of JSC "Ukrnafta" with access to gas and electricity infrastructure;
  • the main technical parameters of the equipment have been agreed upon;
  • project financing has been secured from international partners;
  • a tender procedure for the procurement of an EPC contract for the design, supply, installation and commissioning of the power plant has been launched via the EBRD electronic platform;
  • financing for the procurement of gas piston equipment has been agreed upon with the support of the Finnish-Ukrainian Investment Fund (FUIF).

Project financing

The total estimated budget of the project is UAH 812.9 million excluding VAT (excluding the EPC contract for installation and commissioning).

The procurement of the main equipment (gas piston unit) has been financed 100% from the funds Finnish-Ukrainian Investment Fund (FUIF).

A mixed financing model is envisaged, including:

  • soft loan financing;
  • company's own funds;
  • attraction of international investment instruments.

Further implementation of the Project (Stage IV) depends on the final confirmation of financing by the Finnish-Ukrainian Investment Fund.

Technical solution

The Finnish company Wärtsilä Finland Oy, which is one of the world's leading manufacturers of gas-fired power plants, is being considered as the supplier of the main generating equipment. Wärtsilä has an installed capacity of over 79 GW in more than 180 countries and over 30 years of experience in the production of spark-ignition engines for the power industry.

Wärtsilä gas piston units are characterized by:

  • high electrical efficiency;
  • the ability to operate in quick start modes;
  • high maneuverability;
  • optimized fuel use;
  • reduced CO₂ emissions.

These characteristics make Wärtsilä technology optimal for use in distributed generation projects operating in power system balancing modes. In addition, the company's global service network provides a high level of technical support and minimizes operational risks throughout the entire life cycle of the equipment.

 

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Capacity building

Secondary goal:

Contribution to climate or environmental goals, Increasing compliance with modern standards, Increasing compliance with modern standards, Creation of new facilities and services, Developing new territories or functions, Rebuilding the damaged/destroyed, Improving the equality of wealth distribution, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Introducing innovations and energy-efficient solutions, Creation of new jobs through project implementation, Поява нових виробничих потужностей, Reducing territorial or social gaps, Meeting demand

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

During the implementation of the capacity expansion project for the Support of Critically Necessary Distributed Generation Stage V in Ivano-Frankivsk region, it is expected to install an additional gas piston unit manufactured by Wärtsilä with a capacity of up to 20 MW at the own production site of JSC "Ukrnafta". The key objectives of the project are: • increase in the power generating capacity of the Unified Energy System-U; • increase in the stability of the Unified Energy System-U; • ensure backup power supply of the critical enterprise that provides oil and gas production and preparation; • ensure the critical enterprise's own needs.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

The main beneficiaries of the project implementation: 1. Local communities – Residents of the region will have access to a stable and secure energy supply, which will reduce the risk of power outages, especially in the winter months. As of January 1, 2021, the population of Ivano-Frankivsk region was ≈1,361.1 thousand people, many of whom included children and the elderly, who may be vulnerable to energy shortages due to dependence on centralized heating and limited access to autonomous energy sources. 2. Critical infrastructure – Reliable energy supply will support hospitals, schools, emergency services and utilities, ensuring their uninterrupted operation. The Ivano-Frankivsk region has a network of accredited healthcare facilities, which includes at least more than 50 institutions that provide medical care to the population of all ages. These facilities require a stable supply of electricity and heat to ensure uninterrupted operation of departments, provision of emergency medical care, diagnostics, treatment of patients and support of vulnerable groups of the population, especially in conditions of energy risks. 3. Enterprises and industries – Energy security is essential for local enterprises, helping them to maintain operations, avoid disruptions and contribute to economic growth. Reliable energy supply will increase productivity and support regional economic stability. Vulnerable groups and social impact The project will provide direct benefits to groups most affected by energy insecurity, including: ● Older people – Ensuring access to heating and electricity, especially for those living alone or in care facilities. ● Low-income households – Reducing the risk of energy poverty and improving overall living conditions. ● Persons with disabilities – Ensuring uninterrupted access to essential services, including health facilities, rehabilitation centers and assistive technologies. ● Internally displaced persons (IDPs) – Many displaced families have been displaced to these regions due to war and require stable housing conditions with reliable access to energy. To ensure equitable energy distribution and targeted support, the project will implement a data collection system that: ● Tracks uptime data, measuring the reliability of electricity and heat supply to ensure uninterrupted service to critical facilities and communities. ● Uses analytical data to shape future energy planning and social policies, aligning it with international best practices on energy equity and inclusion.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of jobs, including for IDPs

17 workplaces

Population in the geographical area of influence of the project

1361 thous. people

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Energy Sector

Subsector

Electric power industry

Stream

Construction of new generating capacities

Strategic document

Energy Strategy of Ukraine until 2050

Task

Creation of new generating capacities to ensure the reliability of energy supply, increase energy security and sustainable development of the energy system of Ukraine

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
Annual electricity production
100000 MWh
110000 MWh
Annual revenue from the sale of electricity
1000 mln UAH
1050 mln UAH
Annual income from other activities
100 mln UAH
105 mln UAH
Income from the use of electricity for personal needs
80 mln UAH
85 mln UAH

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Для визначення попиту на електроенергію та теплову енергію застосовано методику прогнозування на основі: статистичного аналізу динаміки споживання за попередні роки (дані ДП «Оператор ринку», НЕК «Укренерго», Держстат України); кореляції з температурними режимами та середньорічними показниками втрат;
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
2546000 MWh
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
2
2597000 MWh
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
3
2649000 MWh
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
4
2702000 MWh
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
5
2756000 MWh
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?

Yes, not yet conducted
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Other benefits from project implementation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Envisaged training or advanced training for women in the private sector
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?

No consultations were held with target groups.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?

All possible positive impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
All possible negative impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?

A policy/code of conduct on non-discrimination and gender equality has been developed
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
OFM PAS20F.pdf
07.03.2026
16:43:30 UTC
Ф3.pdf
09.03.2026
15:25:28 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Construction of a gas-fired power plant with a capacity of up to 20 MW

Technical Solution 2

Construction of a 41.5 MW solar power plant

Total costs1'495'794'633 UAH1'515'800'001 UAH
  • For preparation
  • 131'675'709 UAH76'300'000 UAH
  • For implementation
  • 1'364'118'922 UAH1'390'000'000 UAH
  • For operation
  • 1 UAH1 UAH
  • For closing
  • 1 UAH49'500'000 UAH
    Average annual costs545'784'900 UAH10'200'000 UAH
    Project duration, incl.24 months15 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
  • 9 months6 months
  • Implementation period
  • 15 months9 months
    Service life240 months360 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active

    [The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Rejected

    [The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Components of a technical solution
    To components
    2
    To components
    0

    Commercial Justification

    Supplier and contractor market assessment

    Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
    Yes, both national and international

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
    Запланована форма інвестицій: Змішана форма залучення інвестицій – пільгове кредитне фінансування, власні кошти. Профінансовано: обладнання (ГПУ), 100% (у якості фінансування з коштів ФУІФ). Фінансування закупівлі ЕРС-робіт із проєктування, встановлення та введення в експлуатацію успішно отримано від ЄБРР.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
    Запланована форма інвестицій: Змішана форма залучення інвестицій – пільгове кредитне фінансування, власні кошти. Профінансовано: обладнання (ГПУ), 100% (у якості фінансування з коштів ФУІФ). Фінансування закупівлі ЕРС-робіт із проєктування, встановлення та введення в експлуатацію успішно отримано від ЄБРР.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
    Open competitive bidding

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Competitive dialogue

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Direct negotiation procedures

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Pre-market engagement
    Попереднє вивчення ринку здійснювалося шляхом: аналізу відкритих тендерів у ProZorro; консультацій з галузевими експертами; аналізу реалізованих аналогічних проєктів в Україні та ЄС; запитів до потенційних виробників і постачальників. Це дозволило сформувати реалістичні очікування щодо строків постачання, вартості та технічних параметрів обладнання.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Potential market participants
    Очікується участь: міжнародних виробників основного електричного обладнання, у відповідності до вимог пільгового фінансування ФУІФ. Рівень конкуренції серед виробників обладнання оцінюється як низький, оскільки на ринку присутня обмежена кількість Фінських виробників. Рівень конкуренції серед будівельно-монтажних компаній оцінюється як помірний, оскільки на ринку присутні декілька сильних гравців, готових до реалізації проєктів такого масштабу

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Market readiness assessment
    Очікується участь: міжнародних виробників основного електричного обладнання, у відповідності до вимог пільгового фінансування ФУІФ. Рівень конкуренції серед виробників обладнання оцінюється як низький, оскільки на ринку присутня обмежена кількість Фінських виробників. Рівень конкуренції серед будівельно-монтажних компаній оцінюється як помірний, оскільки на ринку присутні декілька сильних гравців, готових до реалізації проєктів такого масштабу

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget1'495'794'633 UAH1'515'800'001 UAH
    Capital costs1'495'794'633 UAH1'515'800'001 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation131'675'709 UAH76'300'000 UAH
    For implementation1'364'118'922 UAH1'390'000'000 UAH
    For operation1 UAH1 UAH
    For closing1 UAH49'500'000 UAH
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service UnitСередня вартість проєкту на 1 кВт·год 0,84 грн/кВт·год
    Service Unit Cost1 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?YesNo
    Is the project self-sustaining?Yes
    Has the financial condition of the potential beneficiary been assessed in accordance with the order of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine dated 14.07.2016 No. 616?
    Yes
    NPV Value636'700'000 UAH

    Availability of services

    Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
    Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Funding Sources

    Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
    Expected Funds1'495'794'632 UAH0 UAH

    Public-private partnership

    Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
    The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management Rationale

    Team competencies

    Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
    Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - economic analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - communication with stakeholders

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - risk management

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of available procurement options

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - legal support

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial analysis - financial analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - demand analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of the market environment

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
    Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
    Economic justification - social and gender analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management rationale - public consultation

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - environmental expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
    Partially, we are considering options

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
    Specialists in interaction with international financial organizations (IFOs)

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Environmental experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial consultants/modelers

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Legal consultants

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Commercial experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic analysts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic consultants

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Technical experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management experts / project managers

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Risk assessment

    Technical riskDefinedUndefined
    Financial riskDefinedUndefined
    Economic riskDefinedUndefined
    Political riskDefinedUndefined
    Social riskDefinedUndefined
    Operational riskDefinedUndefined
    Market riskDefinedUndefined
    Environmental riskDefinedUndefined

    Organizational events

    ResponseDefinedUndefined
    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

    Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?

    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?

    None of the options are applicable

    Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

    None of the options are applicable
    Need for financing

    Does the project require additional funding for preparation?

    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Approval History

    DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
    09/03/2026SP-N-090326-6CFD4171State SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
    17/03/2026SPP-N-170326-C0704B8DState SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeAccording to the minutes of the meeting of the Strategic Investment Council dated 12.03.2026 No. 1685