"Energy efficiency measures - Major repairs with the introduction of alternative energy systems and thermal modernization of the educational institution "Dergachiv Lyceum No. 3" of the Dergachiv City Council at the address: 62303, Kharkiv region, Dergachi city, Sumsky Shlyakh st., 79-V"


Sector
Education and science
Stream
Modernization and reconstruction of the infrastructure of general secondary education institutions
Maturity level
90
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

In order to save energy, the project provides for the installation of a photovoltaic system consisting of photovoltaic modules (PEM) - 144 modules with a nominal power of 435 W each on the roof of the building, one hybrid three-phase inverter with a capacity of 50 kW and a high-voltage battery of 50 kWh, 512 V. The photovoltaic system equipment (except for photovoltaic modules) is installed in the electrical switchboard on the first floor. The photovoltaic system provides power to existing consumers in ON-Grid mode through a hybrid inverter. The use of a hybrid inverter allows for continuous power supply of some consumers in OFF-Grid mode from photovoltaic modules, from a battery or (in case of insufficient generation of the photovoltaic system and depletion of the battery charge) from the main network. The hybrid inverter charge controller provides support for battery charging. Photovoltaic modules (144 modules in total) are connected in several strings for optimal power distribution. The modules in the string are connected in series using a copper single-core wire of the H1Z2Z2-K 1x6 type. Photovoltaic modules are installed on the roof of the building. In order to ensure uninterrupted power supply to the shelter, the project provides for the installation of a system consisting of a Kon-TEC 10 kW inverter charger and a Kon-TECMANA 16.0 battery - Low-voltage LiFePO4 battery with an energy capacity of 16.07 kWh. Voltage: 51.2 V (nominal). The equipment is installed in the electrical switchboard room (shelter). All metal non-conductive parts of electrical equipment that may be under voltage must be connected to a grounding device (PE conductor). Such parts include: metal housings of electrical equipment, metal parts of ventilation equipment, metal housings of lamps, metal pipes of communications, metal parts of the building frame, etc. The metal parts of the photovoltaic module mounting system and the cable retention system on the roof are connected to the lightning arrester grid using a round aluminum conductor d6 mm. The inverter is protected from secondary lightning strikes by designed surge arresters installed in the RSh2 DC panel on each input from the PV module.

The purpose of the project

Main Goal:

Introducing innovations and energy-efficient solutions

Secondary Goal:

Contribution to climate or environmental goals, Increasing compliance with modern standards, Increasing compliance with modern standards, Improving the equality of wealth distribution, Improving the quality of services

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The project is aimed at implementing innovative and energy-efficient solutions in the municipal institution "Dergachiv Lyceum No. 3" of the Dergachiv City Council by modernizing the engineering infrastructure of the institution, implementing alternative energy systems and increasing the level of energy sustainability of the building. The implementation of the project will ensure a reduction in electricity consumption from traditional sources, increasing the level of energy independence of the educational institution, uninterrupted operation of the shelter and the creation of safe and modern conditions for participants in the educational process. The project will also contribute to achieving climate and environmental goals by reducing greenhouse gas emissions and increasing the efficiency of energy resources. The project goal is expected to be achieved by: - installing a photovoltaic system of solar modules with a total capacity of over 60 kW to generate electricity from renewable sources; - implementing a hybrid power supply system with an inverter and batteries to accumulate electricity and ensure uninterrupted power supply to the facility; - ensuring autonomous power supply of the shelter by installing a separate backup power supply system; - modernization of the building's electrical infrastructure with the introduction of modern protection, grounding and lightning protection systems; - increasing the level of energy efficiency and reliability of operation of the educational institution building; - creating conditions for the stable functioning of the educational institution in conditions of emergency and planned power outages. Currently, the Dergachiv Lyceum No. 3 depends on centralized power supply, which in conditions of martial law, damage to the energy infrastructure and periodic emergency outages creates risks for the continuous functioning of the educational institution and the shelter. The existing power supply system does not provide a sufficient level of energy stability, autonomy and energy efficiency, and also leads to significant costs for paying for energy resources. The target level involves the creation of a modern energy-efficient system using alternative energy sources and electricity storage, which will ensure partial energy independence of the institution, stable power supply to critical consumers, improved quality and safety of educational services, as well as compliance with modern energy efficiency standards and sustainable development requirements.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

The key problems that the project aims to address are the low level of energy sustainability and energy efficiency of the municipal institution "Dergachiv Lyceum No. 3" of the Dergachiv City Council, the high dependence of the institution on centralized power supply, as well as the lack of sufficient autonomous backup power sources to ensure the uninterrupted functioning of the building and shelter. In conditions of martial law and regular threats of damage to the energy infrastructure, the problem of stable power supply to educational institutions is particularly relevant. Periodic emergency and planned power outages create risks of disrupting the educational process, stopping the operation of life support systems, restricting access to safe conditions for students and employees of the institution, and also complicate the functioning of the shelter during air raids. The existing engineering infrastructure of the institution does not provide a sufficient level of autonomy and continuity of power supply to critical consumers. The lack of alternative generation and storage systems for electricity leads to complete dependence on external sources of electricity supply and increases the risks of complete cessation of the institution's functioning in the event of prolonged power outages. An additional problem is the insufficient level of implementation of modern energy-efficient technologies, which causes significant energy costs and does not meet modern requirements for sustainable development, energy conservation and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. If these problems are not resolved, there is a risk of: - disruption of the continuity of the educational process; - restriction of access of participants in the educational process to safe conditions of stay; - inability to ensure proper functioning of shelter during emergencies; - increase in energy costs; - decrease in the level of energy security and sustainability of the institution; - deterioration of the quality of educational services in conditions of unstable power supply. The implementation of the project will ensure partial energy independence of the educational institution by implementing alternative energy systems and electricity storage, increase the level of energy efficiency and energy sustainability of the building, ensure uninterrupted operation of the shelter and critical systems in the event of power outages, reduce the consumption of traditional energy resources and the cost of paying for electricity. The expected positive changes as a result of the project are: - ensuring stable and uninterrupted power supply to the educational institution; - increasing the safety and comfort of students, employees and the population in the shelter; - improving the quality and continuity of educational services; - reducing energy costs; - increasing the level of implementation of modern energy-efficient technologies; - contributing to the achievement of climate and environmental goals through the use of renewable energy sources.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of employees of the institution/institution/organization

1009 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Education and science

Subsector

School education

Stream

Modernization and reconstruction of the infrastructure of general secondary education institutions

Strategic document

State Strategy for Regional Development for 2021–2027

Task

2.1 Improving the material and technical base of educational institutions, ensuring the quality of educational services, particularly in rural areas

Project objectives

Project objectives were not specified by the initiator

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Методологія поєднала адміністративний облік користувачів, інженерний розрахунок енергоспоживання систем безпеки та нормативні вимоги до енергоефективності громадських будівель.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
1009 human
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Economic justification .docx
12.05.2026
11:35:42 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Energy efficiency measures – Major repairs with the introduction of alternative energy systems and thermal modernization of the Dergachiv Lyceum No. 3 educational institution of the Dergachiv City Council

Technical Solution 2

Phased implementation of energy efficiency measures – Major repairs with the introduction of alternative energy systems and thermal modernization of the Dergachiv Lyceum No. 3

Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)6'876'000 UAH7'840'000 UAH
For implementation6'876'000 UAH7'840'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost2'062'800 UAH2'352'000 UAH
For operation2'062'800 UAH2'352'000 UAH
Average annual costs68'760 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.4 months36 months
Deadline for developing a FFS1 month3 months
Implementation period3 months33 months
Service life360 months360 months
Target indicatorsNot definedNot defined
Technical Solution Status
Active

[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Rejected

[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Components of a technical solution
To components
1
To components
0

Commercial Justification

Supplier and contractor market assessment

Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial justification

Total project budget

Total preliminary budget8'938'800 UAH10'192'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)6'876'000 UAH7'840'000 UAH
For preparation0 UAH0 UAH
For implementation6'876'000 UAH7'840'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost2'062'800 UAH2'352'000 UAH
For operation2'062'800 UAH2'352'000 UAH
For closing0 UAH0 UAH
Чи була під час уточнення орієнтовного бюджету використана Методика розрахунку вартості публічного інвестиційного проєкту, затверджена наказом Міністерства фінансів України №316 від 23.06.2025 р.?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Чи була під час розрахунку орієнтовного бюджету використана Методика розрахунку вартості публічного інвестиційного проєкту, затверджена наказом Міністерства фінансів України №316 від 23.06.2025 р.?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Average project cost per service recipient

Service UnitСередня вартість проєкту на одного отримувача послуги
Service Unit Cost8'859 UAH

Profitability of the project

Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo

Availability of services

Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Financing Mechanisms

Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

Source and MechanismYesNo

Funding Sources

Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH

Public-private partnership

Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
12/05/2026SP-L-120526-190E6A71Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludestrategic fit confirmed-
20/05/2026SPP-L-200526-7E41E6AFCommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-90