Major renovation of the building of the Velikooleksandrivsky preschool educational institution No. 2


Sector
Education and science
Stream
Updating the infrastructure of preschool educational institutions
Maturity level
76
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project involves the implementation of major repairs to the building of the Velikooleksandrivka Preschool Education Institution No. 2 of the Velikooleksandrivka Village Council. The purpose of the project is to restore and improve the technical condition of the building, increase the level of safety, energy efficiency and create comfortable conditions for children and employees of the institution. The implementation of the project will contribute to ensuring proper conditions for providing quality preschool educational services to the community.

The purpose of the project

Main Goal:

Meeting demand

Secondary Goal:

Capacity building, Increasing compliance with modern standards, Rebuilding the damaged/destroyed, Improving the equality of wealth distribution, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Improving the quality of services

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The goal of the project is to carry out a major renovation of the building of the Velikooleksandrivka Preschool Education Institution No. 2 of the Velikooleksandrivka Village Council in order to restore its functionality, increase the level of safety, energy efficiency, and create proper sanitary, hygienic, and comfortable conditions for preschool children and employees of the institution.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

The key problems that need to be solved within the framework of the project implementation are: significant physical wear and tear of building structures and premises; outdated and inefficient engineering networks; low energy efficiency of the building, which leads to excessive energy costs; non-compliance of children's living conditions with modern sanitary and hygienic and safety requirements. The urgency of solving these problems is due to the need to ensure the continuous operation of the preschool educational institution, maintain its capacity and improve the quality of educational services. If the problems are not solved, further deterioration of the technical condition of the building is possible, costs for its maintenance increase, as well as threats to the safety of participants in the educational process. As a result of the project implementation, the following are expected: improvement of the technical and operational condition of the building; creation of safe and comfortable conditions for children and employees of the institution; increase in energy efficiency and reduction of costs for utilities; ensuring stable and effective operation of the preschool educational institution; positive social impact for the community through the preservation and development of educational infrastructure.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of people who will use the service

120 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Education and science

Subsector

Preschool education

Stream

Updating the infrastructure of preschool educational institutions

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

1.1.1 Provide conditions for the resumption of in-person education

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
Number of preschool educational institutions that have undergone major repairs of their preschool facilities
0 units
1 units

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

При оцінці попиту було використано: аналіз фактичної наповнюваності закладу за попередні роки; оцінку кількості дітей дошкільного віку, що проживають у межах зони обслуговування закладу; аналіз тенденцій повернення населення та відновлення освітньої інфраструктури після пошкоджень, спричинених воєнними діями; врахування нормативної місткості закладу та потреб у безпечних умовах перебування дітей.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
120 human
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?

No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?

Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?

No consultations were held with target groups.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?

All possible negative impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?

Not provided for by the project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Finnish justification (8) (1).docx
06.02.2026
09:07:51 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Major renovation of the building of the Velikooleksandrivsky preschool educational institution No. 2

Technical Solution 2

New construction of the Velikoy Aleksandrovskogo preschool educational institution No. 2

Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)59'522'037 UAH200'900'000 UAH
For preparation50'000 UAH900'000 UAH
For implementation59'472'037 UAH200'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost150'000 UAH600'000 UAH
For operation100'000 UAH100'000 UAH
For closing50'000 UAH500'000 UAH
Average annual costs100'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.12 months23 months
Deadline for developing a FFS3 months5 months
Implementation period9 months18 months
Service life360 months600 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active

[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Rejected

[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Components of a technical solution
To components
1
To components
0

Commercial Justification

Supplier and contractor market assessment

Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
Для реалізації проєкту обрано стратегію відкритих конкурентних процедур із залученням малих, середніх та великих постачальників і підрядників.

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
Використання платформи ProZorro для всіх процедур закупівель;

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
Open competitive bidding

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Pre-market engagement
огляду відкритих тендерів на аналогічні будівельні роботи в регіоні; консультацій з експертами та профільними організаціями; аналізу досвіду реалізації аналогічних проєктів у межах області та сусідніх громад; прямих запитів до потенційних підрядників щодо наявності ресурсів і можливостей виконання робіт.

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Potential market participants
Кваліфіковані будівельні підрядники області та суміжних регіонів; Постачальники будівельних матеріалів і обладнання; Консультанти та експерти з технічного нагляду; Малі та середні підприємства, зацікавлені у виконанні окремих робіт (електрика, сантехніка, опалення, вентиляція).

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Market readiness assessment
Ринок готовий до реалізації подібного проєкту; Наявні кваліфіковані підрядники з досвідом капітальних ремонтів дитячих закладів; Технології та матеріали доступні на національному рівні; Потенційні бар’єри: регуляторні (отримання дозволів та погоджень), економічні (зростання цін на матеріали), технічні (обмеження конструкцій будівлі). Заходи мінімізації бар’єрів: планування робіт з урахуванням нормативних вимог, залучення декількох постачальників та резерв бюджету на непередбачені витрати.

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial justification

Total project budget

Total preliminary budget59'672'037 UAH201'500'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)59'522'037 UAH200'900'000 UAH
For preparation50'000 UAH900'000 UAH
For implementation59'472'037 UAH200'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost150'000 UAH600'000 UAH
For operation100'000 UAH100'000 UAH
For closing50'000 UAH500'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Average project cost per service recipient

Service UnitВартість послуги
Service Unit Cost200 UAH

Profitability of the project

Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Is the project self-sustaining?No

Availability of services

Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Financing Mechanisms

Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

Source and MechanismYesNo

Funding Sources

Approved Funds53'076'016 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds53'076'016 UAH0 UAH

Public-private partnership

Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Management Rationale

Team competencies

Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - public consultations

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of available procurement options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - legal support

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial analysis - financial analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - demand analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of the market environment

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Partially, we have limited experience

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
No

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
Specialists in interaction with international financial organizations (IFOs)

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Environmental experts

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial consultants/modelers

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Legal consultants

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Commercial experts

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic analysts

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic consultants

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Technical experts

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Social/gender consultants

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Management experts / project managers

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
No

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Risk assessment

Financial riskDefinedUndefined

Organizational events

ResponseDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?

None of the options are applicable

Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

None of the options are applicable
Need for financing

Does the project require additional funding for preparation?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
06/02/2026SP-L-060226-74A766A7Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeStrategic fit confirmed-
11/02/2026SPP-L-110226-5DE47BBACommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeStrategic fit confirmed76