Major repairs of the public highway of state importance T-26-08 Storozhynets - checkpoint "Krasnoilsk" on the section km 21+354 - km 28+694, Chernivtsi region. Adjustments
Sector
Transport Sector
Stream
Development and expansion of border infrastructure with the countries of the European Union and the Republic of Moldova
Project Status
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SP
Investment Feasibility Study
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
The MAPP "Krasnoilsk - Vikovu de Sus", which became operational in November 2022, in particular carries out customs clearance of empty trucks heading to the European Union. The entrance to the MAPP is via the T-26-08 Storozhynets - Krasnoilsk highway. Due to the intensive traffic of empty trucks heading to the European Union, queues form in front of the checkpoint, which in turn makes it difficult for other road users to travel to the state border. Given the existing features and the need to avoid emergency situations on this road, there is a need to arrange a sludge area and an accumulation lane for trucks.
The purpose of the project
Main Goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards
Secondary Goal:
Improving the condition of infrastructure
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
The project's goal is to improve the optimization and modernization of transport flows in terms of infrastructure capacity, interoperability, and service efficiency.
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
The checkpoint is heavily loaded, which leads to queues in front of the checkpoint with trucks and blocking the only lane. Blocking forces drivers of passenger vehicles to move in the lane of oncoming traffic, which provokes the creation of dangerous situations and can lead to road accidents and injuries to road users. Taking into account the need to unblock the lane for freight traffic, an open parking lot has been designed at km 28+581 to the right of 46 parking spaces for freight vehicles and an additional lane, which will allow another 60 cars to stop.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Capacity
708 transp.
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Transport Sector
Subsector
Road Border Crossing Points
Stream
Development and expansion of border infrastructure with the countries of the European Union and the Republic of Moldova
Strategic document
Strategy for the Development and Expansion of Border Infrastructure with EU Countries and the Republic of Moldova until 2030
Task
Development and expansion of border road infrastructure, namely, state border crossing points for road traffic and access roads to them within controlled border areas
Project objectives
Indicator
Base value
Target value
Accumulation strip and sludge pad
2 units
2 units
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
None of the options are applicable
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
Major repairs of the public highway of state importance T-26-08 Storozhynets - checkpoint "Krasnoilsk" on the section km 21+354 - km 28+694, Chernivtsi region. Adjustments
Technical Solution 2
Major repairs of the public highway of state importance T-26-08 Storozhynets - checkpoint "Krasnoilsk" on the section km 21+354 - km 28+694, Chernivtsi region. Adjustments
Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)159'095'002 UAH165'100'000 UAH
For preparation50'000 UAH100'000 UAH
For implementation159'045'002 UAH165'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost16'813'929 UAH16'413'939 UAH
For operation16'800'000 UAH16'400'000 UAH
For closing13'929 UAH13'939 UAH
Average annual costs1'400'000 UAH1'400'000 UAH
Project duration, incl.15 months24 months
Deadline for developing a FFS3 months12 months
Implementation period12 months12 months
Service life144 months144 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, both national and international
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget175'908'931 UAH181'513'939 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)159'095'002 UAH165'100'000 UAH
For preparation50'000 UAH100'000 UAH
For implementation159'045'002 UAH165'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost16'813'929 UAH16'413'939 UAH
For operation16'800'000 UAH16'400'000 UAH
For closing13'929 UAH13'939 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service UnitОдин отримувач послуги
Service Unit Cost417 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Is the project self-sustaining?No
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
No – analysis not performed
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Need for financing
Does the project require additional funding for preparation?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
20/03/2026SP-N-200326-C2ED8335State SPPreliminary Investment Feasibility StudyInclude--