Creation of a multifunctional cultural hub in the village of Oleksandrivka


Sector
Culture and information
Stream
Improving the conditions for providing basic cultural services by modernizing the material and technical base and bringing cultural institutions into proper condition
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project involves the modernization and functional rethinking of the existing building in order to create a modern multifunctional cultural and public hub for the residents of the Chornomorska territorial community.

Problems solved by the project:

The village of Oleksandrivka of the Chornomorska territorial community lacks a modern, safe and functional infrastructure for the provision of cultural and public services.

Key problems:

1. Lack of a specialized hall for circus and dance activities

A circus studio operates in the community, but there is no room that meets the basic technical requirements (height, safe suspended structures, floor coverings).

Consequence: limitations on the development of the group, risks of injuries, inability to scale activities. 

2. Lack of a safe space for holding mass events

Today, the village lacks a hall located next to a shelter, which makes it impossible to hold events in compliance with security requirements under martial law.

Consequence: limitations on the cultural life of the community, inability to hold events for a wide audience.

3. Lack of public space and co-working

The village lacks open public spaces for: youth, public organizations, initiative groups. Consequence: low level of social activity, lack of environment for development of initiatives. 

4. Outdated material and technical base

The existing premises are not equipped with modern equipment (light, sound, furniture), which limits the quality of service provision.

Consequence: reduced attractiveness of events and low attendance. 

5. Limited opportunities for club activities

Due to limited space and non-functional planning, it is impossible to: increase the number of clubs, divide the space by type of activity.

Consequence: limited coverage of children and youth. 

6. Non-functioning of the main building of the cultural center

The main building of the Oleksandrivskyi Cultural Center: is in unsatisfactory technical condition, has no shelter, cannot be modernized within the available budget

Consequence: loss of a key cultural object of the community. 

7. Lack of space for youth and public initiatives

The community lacks infrastructure for the activities of: youth councils, public organizations, educational and social projects

Consequence: low level of involvement of the population in public life.

8. Lack of modern library space

The existing book collection does not have a suitable environment for: reading, working with information, conducting educational activities

Consequence: decreased interest in reading and informal education. 

The combination of these problems indicates the lack of a holistic cultural infrastructure in the community that meets modern requirements for safety, accessibility, and functionality. The implementation of the project will allow for a comprehensive solution to these problems by creating a multifunctional cultural hub that will combine cultural, educational and public functions in one safe space.

The project plans to:

  • create a transformed auditorium (combining premises) for events, circus and dance studio classes;
  • arrange a stage with basic lighting and sound equipment;
  • create a library space with a mini-exhibition hall;
  • arrange a coworking area and public space;
  • arrange group rooms;
  • create an inclusive environment (ramp, bathrooms); 
  • update engineering networks (water, sewage, insulation). 

The building already has access to a shelter (on the school grounds), which allows it to be used as a safe public space in accordance with modern requirements.

The project will provide:

  • expanding access to cultural services;
  • creating conditions for the development of children, youth and adults;
  • improving the quality of the cultural infrastructure of the community.

Quantitative indicators of project implementation:

As of 2025, the institution provided cultural services to approximately 1,600 community residents (≈32% of the population). After the project implementation, the following dynamics are predicted:

Population coverage by cultural services:

  • 2026: 1700 people (+6%);
  • 2027: 2000 people (+25% to the base level);
  • 2028: 2100 people (+31%) 2029: 2200 people (+37%).

Number of events:

  • 2025: 45-50 events (estimate);
  • 2026: 50 events;
  • 2027: 60 events (+20%);
  • 2028: 65 events (+30%);
  • 2029: 70 events (+40%).

Number of group participants:

  • 2025: ~25-30 people;
  • 2026: 30 people;
  • 2027: 35 people;
  • 2028: 38 people;
  • 2029: 40 people (+30-40%).

Number of group participants:

  • 2025: ~25-30 people;
  • 2026: 30 people;
  • 2027: 35 people;
  • 2028: 38 people;
  • 2029: 40 people (+30–40%).

Number of types of services (including new functions):

  • 2025: 2–3 types of services;
  • 2026: 5 types;
  • 2029: 7+ types of services (added: rental, coworking, exhibitions, master classes).

Space utilization rate:

before reconstruction: 

  • ≈10–20% occupancy 

after:

  • 2026: 50%;
  • 2029: 70-75%.

Qualitative indicators:

  • creation of barrier-free access (100% accessibility of key areas);
  • possibility of holding events for up to 80 people (previously limited);
  • emergence of new areas of activity (theaters, open library, coworking);
  • creation of a multifunctional space instead of a narrow-profile club.

Expected results:

Project will ensure:

  • increase in the coverage of the population with cultural services by 30-40%;
  • expand the range of services by more than 2 times;
  • increase in the number of events by 40%;
  • increase in the efficiency of space use;
  • create a modern, safe and inclusive community center.

The purpose of the project

Main Goal:

Improving the quality of services

Secondary Goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards, Developing new territories or functions, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Ensuring inclusiveness and equal opportunities, Introducing innovations and energy-efficient solutions

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

Detailed description of the project goal and the method of achieving it The goal of the project is to improve the quality, accessibility and diversity of cultural and educational services in the Black Sea territorial community by modernizing the existing infrastructure and creating a multifunctional cultural hub that will meet modern standards of safety, inclusiveness and energy efficiency. Justification of the gap between the current and target state As of today, the existing infrastructure does not meet modern requirements for the provision of cultural services, which is manifested in: limited functionality of the premises and the absence of a full-fledged auditorium; the inability to hold mass events in safe conditions (the absence of a hall next to the shelter); the absence of specialized spaces for circus and dance activities; limited opportunities for the development of club activities; the absence of public space, co-working and library environment; outdated or absent material and technical base; lack of barrier-free access. As a result, the level of coverage of the population by cultural services is about 1,600 people per year (≈32% of the population), which indicates a significant gap between the existing capabilities and the needs of the community. Target state after project implementation After project implementation, the following level is planned to be achieved: creation of a multifunctional space with an auditorium for up to 80 people; ensuring the possibility of safe events; creating conditions for the functioning of circus and dance studios; opening of a library, exhibition and public space; introduction of new service formats (coworking, rental, master classes); ensuring barrier-free access; modernization of engineering systems and increasing energy efficiency. Population coverage is expected to increase to 2,100–2,200 people per year (≈42–44%) within three years after project implementation. Methods of achieving the project goal The goal is achieved by implementing a set of interrelated measures: 1. Modernization and redevelopment of space combining premises to create an auditorium; forming functional zoning (hall, stage, clubs, library, coworking). 2. Updating engineering infrastructure conducting water supply and sewage; modernization of electrical networks; insulation of premises and increasing energy efficiency. 3. Equipping with modern equipment installing stage lighting and sound; arranging the stage; purchasing furniture and functional equipment; creating conditions for circus activities. 4. Ensuring inclusivity arranging ramps; creating inclusive bathrooms; ensuring accessibility of the main functional areas. 5. Expanding the functionality of the institution implementing new services (rental, coworking, exhibition activities); creating conditions for the activities of youth and community initiatives; development of library and educational areas. Expected effect of the project implementation The implementation of the project will allow: to improve the quality of cultural services; to increase population coverage by 30–40%; to expand the range of services more than twice; to ensure compliance with modern safety and accessibility standards; to create a sustainable public space for community development; to increase the efficiency of infrastructure use.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

In the village of Oleksandrivka of the Chornomorsk territorial community, there is a building that is partially used to provide cultural services. The total area of the facility is about 280 m². The existing infrastructure is characterized by the following: the premises are used fragmentarily and do not have functional zoning; there is no full-fledged auditorium for holding events; the premises are not adapted for specialized activities (circus, choreography); there is no library space, exhibition area and public space; the material and technical base is outdated or absent (lighting, sound, furniture); engineering networks (water supply, sewage, electricity) are partially absent or operate in a simplified mode; the building does not meet modern requirements for energy efficiency and thermal comfort; there is no full barrier-free access; the use of space is limited due to planning and technical restrictions. At the same time, the main building of the Oleksandrivskyi House of Culture is not functioning due to its unsatisfactory technical condition and lack of shelter, which makes it impossible to use it in accordance with modern safety requirements. As of 2025, the coverage of cultural services is about 1,600 people per year (≈32% of the community population), which indicates a limited level of access.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Operating expenses per year

130 thous. UAH

Maintenance costs per year

230 thous. UAH

Capital expenditure per year

6.6 mln UAH

Number of people who will use the service

2 thous. people

Capacity

200 human

Number of employees of the institution/institution/organization

9 human

Population in the geographical area of influence of the project

5 thous. people

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Culture and information

Subsector

Cultural Services

Stream

Improving the conditions for providing basic cultural services by modernizing the material and technical base and bringing cultural institutions into proper condition

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

3.4.2 Modernize and renovate the infrastructure of the community, sports and cultural institutions, and update their material and technical base.

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
Revenue from paid services
80 thous. UAH
230 thous. UAH
Level of coverage of the population with cultural services
32 %
44 %
Share of accessible (inclusive) areas
0 %
100 %
Number of events per year
50 units
70 units
Number of visitors to cultural services per year
1.6 thous. people
2.2 thous. people
Space occupancy level
20 %
70 %
Number of participants in club activities
30 human
40 human
Number of types of cultural services
3 units
7 units

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Оцінка попиту базується на наступних даних: Фактичне використання послуг: станом на 2025 рік — близько 1600 відвідувачів/рік; обмеження пов’язані з інфраструктурою, а не відсутністю попиту. Розрахунок потенційного охоплення: населення громади — близько 5000 осіб; поточне охоплення — ≈ 32%; прогнозоване охоплення — до 42–44% після реалізації проєкту. Аналіз функціонального розширення: після модернізації додаються: глядацька зала; бібліотечний простір; коворкінг; нові гурткові напрямки; ? що об’єктивно збільшує попит. Порівняльний аналіз: використано досвід аналогічних громад, де після модернізації: зростання відвідуваності становить 25–50%. Експертна оцінка: враховано: відсутність альтернативних просторів у населеному пункті; наявність активних творчих колективів; запит громади на безпечний публічний простір.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
0.93 thous. people
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
2
1.25 thous. people
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
3
1.4 thous. people
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
4
1.62 thous. people
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

None of the options are applicable

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF THE PROJECT.docx
02.04.2026
10:09:00 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Reconstruction of part of the building (old wing) of the Oleksandrivskyi ZZSO with adaptation to a cultural services center

Technical Solution 2

Reconstruction of the existing building of the Oleksandrivsky House of Culture

Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)18'200'000 UAH46'200'000 UAH
For preparation800'000 UAH1'200'000 UAH
For implementation17'400'000 UAH45'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost800'000 UAH1'500'000 UAH
For operation600'000 UAH1'200'000 UAH
For closing200'000 UAH300'000 UAH
Average annual costs600'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.42 months45 months
Deadline for developing a FFS6 months9 months
Implementation period36 months36 months
Service life120 months240 months
Target indicatorsDefined Not defined
Technical Solution Status
Active

[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Pending

[The project initiator has not taken any decision about this alternative technical approach.]

Components of a technical solution
To components
0
To components
0

Commercial Justification

Supplier and contractor market assessment

Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial justification

Total project budget

Total preliminary budget19'000'000 UAH47'700'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)18'200'000 UAH46'200'000 UAH
For preparation800'000 UAH1'200'000 UAH
For implementation17'400'000 UAH45'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost800'000 UAH1'500'000 UAH
For operation600'000 UAH1'200'000 UAH
For closing200'000 UAH300'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Average project cost per service recipient

Service Unit1 відвідувач культурних послуг на рік
Service Unit Cost900 UAH

Profitability of the project

Is the project expected to generate income?YesNo

Availability of services

Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
No – analysis not performed

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Financing Mechanisms

Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

Source and MechanismYesNo

Funding Sources

Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH

Public-private partnership

Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Management Rationale

Team competencies

Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - economic analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - communication with stakeholders

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - risk management

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - social and gender analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - public consultations

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of available procurement options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - demand analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - environmental expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of the market environment

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Partially, we have limited experience

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
Financial analysis - financial analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Management justification - legal support

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Risk assessment

Technical riskDefinedUndefined
Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Social riskDefinedUndefined
Operational riskDefinedUndefined

Team involvement

How exactly are/will stakeholders be involved?
Focus group

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Online survey

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Meetings with local authorities

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Public consultations

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Public hearings

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

When are/will engagement activities be taking place?
At the project monitoring stage

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

At the project implementation stage

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

At the project preparation stage

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

How is/will the public be informed about the importance of participation and available channels for feedback?
Official websites

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

https://od.cmr.gov.ua/
Social networks

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Are public hearings being held/will they be held (offline, online)?
Yes, offline.

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Громадські консультації та обговорення проєкту проводяться та будуть продовжені у форматі офлайн-зустрічей із мешканцями громади, представниками молоді, творчих колективів та громадських організацій. Під час підготовки проєкту вже здійснювались консультації з користувачами простору щодо функціонального наповнення (глядацька зала, гурткові приміщення, бібліотека, громадський простір), що дозволило врахувати реальні потреби громади. На етапі реалізації проєкту планується проведення додаткових відкритих обговорень для інформування населення, збору зворотного зв’язку та коригування окремих рішень.
Who will attend the public hearings?
Representatives of public organizations

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Experts

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Community representatives

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Government officials

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Public hearings have already been held
No

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
02/04/2026SP-L-020426-16333C06Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--