General Information
Program Description
To form an innovative solid waste management system in Ukraine by creating a cluster network of regional centers that provide sorting, production of alternative fuel (RDF, SRF) and its combustion at CHPs with electricity and heat production, in accordance with the principles of the circular economy and European standards.
To create three typical technical and economic models, which can then be:
- scaled to other cities;
- offered as standardized solutions within the framework of state policy;
- used to attract investors (public and private).
Strategic Case
Program Goal
Strategic Relevance of the Program
Program Objectives
Volume of natural gas replaced (per year)
0 m3
70000000 m3
Number of CHP plants built or modernized using RDF/SRF
0 units
7 units
Level of population coverage by household waste management services
82 %
93 %
Amount of electricity generated from RDF/SRF (per hour)
0 kW
245000000 kW
Level of preparation for reuse and recycling of household waste
6 %
30 %
Amount of greenhouse gas reduction (CO₂-equivalent)
0 t
210000 t
Level of household waste disposal
93 %
60 %
Programme Sustainable Development Goals
Economic Case
Economic feasibility of the program
What are the main benefits expected from the implementation of the program for the economy, business, society, or individual industries?
Does the program objective provide for a contribution to the climate goal of mitigating the effects of climate change?
Does the program objective provide a contribution to the climate change adaptation objective: reducing the impact and/or reducing the vulnerability of an asset or population to one or more types of physical climate hazards?
Does the programme objective provide for a contribution to the climate objective of sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources?
Does the program objective provide for a contribution to the climate goal of transitioning to a circular economy?
Does the programme objective provide for a contribution to the climate objective of pollution prevention and control?
Does the program objective provide for a contribution to the climate goal of protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems?
What social consequences are relevant for your program, after its implementation?
Why is it advisable to implement projects in the format of one comprehensive program, and not separately?
How will the program help strengthen other economic processes or reforms?
Program Components
Component ID
DREAM-A1
Development of typical feasibility studies (FES) for RDF/SRF clusters
Justification
Considering the different scale (1 large, 2 medium, 4 small), at least 3–4 typical models are required
Year
Amount
1
42'000'000 UAH
Component ID
DREAM-A8
Management and Coordination Center
Justification
Program Coordination Office, methodology, GR activities, analytics
Year
Amount
1
25'000'000 UAH
2
25'000'000 UAH
3
25'000'000 UAH
4
25'000'000 UAH
5
25'000'000 UAH
Component ID
DREAM-A7
Monitoring, audit, environmental assessment
Justification
Involvement of independent auditors, CE assessments, adaptation to EU standards
Year
Amount
2
53'500'000 UAH
3
53'500'000 UAH
4
53'500'000 UAH
5
53'500'000 UAH
Component ID
DREAM-A2
Construction and launch of sorting lines + RDF/SRF production
Justification
Year
Amount
3
2'266'000'000 UAH
4
2'266'000'000 UAH
5
2'266'000'000 UAH
Component ID
DREAM-A3
Installation and start-up of RDF/SRF CHP plants
Justification
The main expense item is ~60% of the total budget (purchase, installation, engineering networks)
Year
Amount
3
8'157'500'000 UAH
4
8'157'500'000 UAH
5
8'157'500'000 UAH
Component ID
DREAM-A5
Personnel training and training centers
Justification
Training 300+ specialists + 2 training hubs
Year
Amount
2
84'000'000 UAH
Component ID
DREAM-A4
IT monitoring system and digital management of solid waste flows
Justification
Centralized system with modules for 7 cities, unified analytics and integration
Year
Amount
2
60'000'000 UAH
3
60'000'000 UAH
Component ID
DREAM-A6
Transportation infrastructure, logistics, engineering networks
Justification
~10% of the total cost (average estimate based on previous projects)
Year
Amount
2
906'333'333 UAH
3
906'333'333 UAH
4
906'333'333 UAH
Financial justification
Total estimated program cost
34'574'499'999 UAH
Estimated cost of program components
34'574'499'999 UAH
Component
Amount
Development of typical feasibility studies (FES) for RDF/SRF clusters
42'000'000 UAH
Management and Coordination Center
125'000'000 UAH
Monitoring, audit, environmental assessment
214'000'000 UAH
Construction and launch of sorting lines + RDF/SRF production
6'798'000'000 UAH
Installation and start-up of RDF/SRF CHP plants
24'472'500'000 UAH
Personnel training and training centers
84'000'000 UAH
IT monitoring system and digital management of solid waste flows
120'000'000 UAH
Transportation infrastructure, logistics, engineering networks
2'718'999'999 UAH
Cost justification
Short description
Justification document
Sources and mechanisms of financial support for the implementation of programs.
Status
Funding mechanisms
Coverage, %
Investment
Blended financing. Debt financing (attracted by a state-owned unitary enterprise or a commercial company, more than 50% of the share capital of which belongs to the state, excluding banks) and grant financing. Concessional debt financing with a state guarantee and grant.
100%
Justification document
What potential funding sources can be mobilized on the basis of prior agreements or intentions to cooperate (if any)
Potential sources of financing for the program Within the framework of the implementation of the Solid Fuel Thermal Power Plant Development Program (RDF/SRF), mixed financing is envisaged from international partners, the state budget, local budgets, as well as with the involvement of the private sector (in the format of public-private partnership). Priority sources of financing: Economic Development and Cooperation Fund (EDCF, Republic of Korea) 3 projects of the program are included in the intergovernmental protocol between Ukraine and the Republic of Korea as priority. The projects are currently at the final stage of preliminary approval within the EDCF 2025–2027 package. Financing is envisaged in the form of a concessional loan on long-term terms, accompanied by technical assistance (TA). Project Preparation Fund (PPF) One of the 7 pilot clusters has already passed the initial assessment and is included in the PPF portfolio. This project is being considered by three key international financial institutions: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) European Investment Bank (EIB) World Bank (IBRD) The financing format is being considered, both through investment loans and the possibility of an accompanying grant component (for example, through the E5P fund, NEFCO or NIP). Additional sources being considered: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) Has a preliminary interest in supporting clusters with a high degree of readiness (project documentation, feasibility study). Combined financing is possible: loan + investment grant (through E5P). EBRD is considering the project within the framework of sectoral support for the development of the circular economy in Ukraine. World Bank (IBRD) With the support of the Ministry of Reconstruction of Ukraine, the World Bank has included one of the cluster projects in the long-term portfolio of infrastructure recovery initiatives. The possibility of obtaining a long-term investment loan is envisaged. European Investment Bank (EIB) Considering the project within the framework of the Urban Renewal and Waste Management Program in Ukraine. Possible participation in individual technical or infrastructure components (sorting stations, IT systems, logistics). Other potential sources (under development): E5P Fund – as a grant instrument that can cover up to 20% of the cost of individual components within the framework of co-financing with the EBRD or EIB. French and Swiss Embassies – in the context of supporting environmental projects at the municipal level (through AFD, SECO). Private investors / concessionaires – possibility of involvement at the operation stage of clusters (CHP operators, RDF producers). Participation of state and local budgets The state budget of Ukraine – can provide co-financing of up to 15% of the total cost of each project. Local budgets – their participation is expected in providing land plots, connecting to engineering infrastructure and supporting the preparatory stage. The advantage of the program is modularity and a typical feasibility study, which allows projects to be implemented quickly, on a scale and taking into account the standards of donor organizations. This significantly increases the attractiveness for external partners and investors, ensuring a high level of readiness to attract financing.
Management Case
Total program duration (months): 5
Approaches to project selection
Have approaches and criteria been defined for including public investment projects in the program, initiators of such projects, and their prioritization?
Organizational Measures
Management and Coordination Center
148 months
Monitoring, audit, environmental assessment
48 months
Transportation infrastructure, logistics, engineering networks
36 months
Installation and start-up of RDF/SRF CHP plants
36 months
Construction and launch of sorting lines + RDF/SRF production
36 months
IT monitoring system and digital management of solid waste flows
24 months
Personnel training and training centers
7 months
Development of typical feasibility studies (FES) for RDF/SRF clusters
6 months
Risk Assessment
Risk
Probability
Degree
Strategy
Risk
Compliance with EU standards, environmental impact assessment (EIA), environmental supervision.
Probability
Low
Degree
Considerable
Strategy
Reduction
Risk
Heat/power purchase contracts or long-term agreements with municipalities.
Probability
Medium
Degree
Considerable
Strategy
Transfer
Risk
Include PPP mechanisms, share risks with private operators/investors.
Probability
Medium
Degree
Considerable
Strategy
Transfer
Risk
Communicate with the public and explain the benefits of the circular economy.
Probability
Medium
Degree
Considerable
Strategy
Reduction
Risk
Taking into account the distance from the front line, duplication of logistics routes, backup CHP.
Probability
Medium
Degree
Critical
Strategy
Acceptance
Risk
Diversify funding sources, build reserves, and actively involve donors.
Probability
High
Degree
Critical
Strategy
Reduction
Risk
Attract leading designers, implement proven technologies, and conduct piloting.
Probability
Medium
Degree
Considerable
Strategy
Avoidance
Risk
Monitor policy changes, ensure broad interagency support.
Probability
Low
Degree
Considerable
Strategy
Reduction