Solid fuel CHP network development program (RDF/SRF)


Sector

Municipal infrastructure and services

Stream

Development and rehabilitation of municipal infrastructure of subnational governments

Entry into Portfolio

State level of SPP

Maturity level

68

General Information

Program Description

To form an innovative solid waste management system in Ukraine by creating a cluster network of regional centers that provide sorting, production of alternative fuel (RDF, SRF) and its combustion at CHPs with electricity and heat production, in accordance with the principles of the circular economy and European standards.

To create three typical technical and economic models, which can then be:

  • scaled to other cities;
  • offered as standardized solutions within the framework of state policy;
  • used to attract investors (public and private).

Strategic Case

Program Goal

Main Goal: Expansion of capacities
Secondary Goal: Creation of new facilities and services, Modernization to comply with current standards, Development of new territories or functions, Meeting growing demand, Expanding access to goods and services
Problems: Project goal: to create an innovative, scalable solid waste management system (SWMS) in Ukraine by implementing a cluster network of regional centers that provide a full cycle: waste sorting → production of alternative fuel (RDF/SRF) → generation of heat and electricity at CHP. The project aims to: Reduce the volume of MSW landfilling, which poses an environmental and sanitary threat to most regions of Ukraine. Create an energy source that is independent of imported fuel (gas, oil, coal). Stimulate a circular economy where waste becomes a resource. Ensure standardization of technologies that will allow their scaling throughout Ukraine. Method of achieving the goal 1. Pilot implementation in 3-7 regions Choice of three typical territorial models (small community, medium-sized city, agglomeration). Implementation of a full cycle in each: sorting station + RDF/SRF production + CHP. 2. Development of typical technical and economic models Preparation of three models (small/medium/large scale) taking into account: volumes of MSW, population density, heat and electricity needs. Unification of design solutions and preparation of investment packages. 3. Creation of RDF/SRF CHP plants Construction or re-equipment of CHP plants capable of operating on alternative fuels. Connection to local heating networks or electricity networks. 4. Integration into regional development strategies Coordination with waste management plans of communities and regions. Inclusion in national and European programs on circular economy and energy security. 5. Financing through public-private partnerships and donors Search and attraction of donor funds for the construction of CHP plants (for example, EBRD, KfW, EDCF, IFC). Private investment in RDF/SRF production. Creation of favorable tariff conditions through the National Commission for the Regulation of Energy and Utilities of Ukraine. 6. Training and institutional support Training of personnel to work with RDF/heat generation. Creation of a Competence Center to spread experience to other communities. Results after implementation: Utilization of > 60% of MSW through energy use. Production of heat/electricity without fossil fuels. Up to 70% reduction in landfill volumes. Creation of new jobs. Real contribution to decarbonization and energy independence of Ukraine."

Strategic Relevance of the Program

Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Subsector
Development and Reconstruction of Subnational Infrastructure
Stream
Development and rehabilitation of municipal infrastructure of subnational governments
Strategic Document
State Strategy for Regional Development for 2021–2027
Task
Завдання 2 за напрямом “Стимулювання розвитку територій” Оперативної цілі 1. Забезпечення інтегрованого розвитку територій з урахуванням інтересів майбутніх поколінь Development and rehabilitation of municipal infrastructure of subnational governments

Program Objectives

Indicator
Baseline Value
Target Value

Volume of natural gas replaced (per year)

0 m3

70000000 m3

Number of CHP plants built or modernized using RDF/SRF

0 units

7 units

Level of population coverage by household waste management services

82 %

93 %

Amount of electricity generated from RDF/SRF (per hour)

0 kW

245000000 kW

Level of preparation for reuse and recycling of household waste

6 %

30 %

Amount of greenhouse gas reduction (CO₂-equivalent)

0 t

210000 t

Level of household waste disposal

93 %

60 %

Programme Sustainable Development Goals

Economic Case

Economic feasibility of the program

What are the main benefits expected from the implementation of the program for the economy, business, society, or individual industries?

Improving energy efficiency
Improving business conditions
Increasing employment levels, creating new jobs
Growth in production, market volumes of goods/services/investments
Reducing regional imbalances
Infrastructure development
Improving the quality of life of the population
Increase in budget revenues

Does the program objective provide for a contribution to the climate goal of mitigating the effects of climate change?

Reducing or avoiding greenhouse gas emissions
Reducing the use of fuel and energy resources

Does the program objective provide a contribution to the climate change adaptation objective: reducing the impact and/or reducing the vulnerability of an asset or population to one or more types of physical climate hazards?

Temperature-related threats (changes in air, fresh water, seawater temperatures; heat stress; temperature fluctuations; heat waves; frost; forest fire)
Threats related to water resources (changes in the structure and types of precipitation (rain, hail, snow/ice); precipitation or hydrological variability; saltwater intrusion; sea level rise; water stress; drought, heavy precipitation (rain, hail, snow/ice); floods (coastal, river, pluvial, groundwater).

Does the programme objective provide for a contribution to the climate objective of sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources?

Increasing the efficiency of water resources use

Does the program objective provide for a contribution to the climate goal of transitioning to a circular economy?

Increasing the use of by-products and secondary raw materials, including by increasing the recyclability of products or waste
Reducing the content of hazardous substances and replacing substances of particular environmental concern in materials and products throughout their life cycle
Minimizing incineration and avoiding landfilling of waste
Development of waste management infrastructure
Reducing the use of primary raw materials
Preventing or reducing waste generation

Does the programme objective provide for a contribution to the climate objective of pollution prevention and control?

Preventing or reducing emissions of pollutants into air, water or soil
Improving air, water or soil quality
Preventing or minimizing the negative impacts of the production, use or disposal of chemicals

Does the program objective provide for a contribution to the climate goal of protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems?

Nature conservation and biodiversity
Sustainable land use and management of land resources

What social consequences are relevant for your program, after its implementation?

Enhancing public participation
Increasing employment levels
Improving living conditions
Improving access to basic services
Reducing social inequality

Why is it advisable to implement projects in the format of one comprehensive program, and not separately?

Strengthening the overall impact through the interaction of individual projects within the program
Ability to simultaneously cover several interrelated aspects of a problem and ensure a systematic approach
Cost reduction through pooling of resources and centralized management
Implementing activities within a common or adjacent territory to achieve a more effective result
Ensuring coordinated planning, management and monitoring of projects within a single structure
The need to comply with legal requirements, government strategies or policies
Other

How will the program help strengthen other economic processes or reforms?

Optimization of logistics or production chains
Promoting the development of related sectors of the economy
Support for the implementation of state or sectoral reforms
Deepening integration into international economic processes
Stimulating digitalization and innovation
Other

Program Components

Financial justification

Total estimated program cost

34'574'499'999 UAH

Estimated cost of program components

34'574'499'999 UAH

Component

Amount

Development of typical feasibility studies (FES) for RDF/SRF clusters

42'000'000 UAH

Management and Coordination Center

125'000'000 UAH

Monitoring, audit, environmental assessment

214'000'000 UAH

Construction and launch of sorting lines + RDF/SRF production

6'798'000'000 UAH

Installation and start-up of RDF/SRF CHP plants

24'472'500'000 UAH

Personnel training and training centers

84'000'000 UAH

IT monitoring system and digital management of solid waste flows

120'000'000 UAH

Transportation infrastructure, logistics, engineering networks

2'718'999'999 UAH

Cost justification

Short description

Justification document

n/a

Cost justification (2).pdf

n/a

TEC_ukr (1).pdf

n/a

CHP_eng (1).pdf

Sources and mechanisms of financial support for the implementation of programs.

Status
Funding mechanisms
Coverage, %

Investment

Blended financing. Debt financing (attracted by a state-owned unitary enterprise or a commercial company, more than 50% of the share capital of which belongs to the state, excluding banks) and grant financing. Concessional debt financing with a state guarantee and grant.

100%

Justification document
To the documents
What potential funding sources can be mobilized on the basis of prior agreements or intentions to cooperate (if any)

Potential sources of financing for the program Within the framework of the implementation of the Solid Fuel Thermal Power Plant Development Program (RDF/SRF), mixed financing is envisaged from international partners, the state budget, local budgets, as well as with the involvement of the private sector (in the format of public-private partnership). Priority sources of financing: Economic Development and Cooperation Fund (EDCF, Republic of Korea) 3 projects of the program are included in the intergovernmental protocol between Ukraine and the Republic of Korea as priority. The projects are currently at the final stage of preliminary approval within the EDCF 2025–2027 package. Financing is envisaged in the form of a concessional loan on long-term terms, accompanied by technical assistance (TA). Project Preparation Fund (PPF) One of the 7 pilot clusters has already passed the initial assessment and is included in the PPF portfolio. This project is being considered by three key international financial institutions: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) European Investment Bank (EIB) World Bank (IBRD) The financing format is being considered, both through investment loans and the possibility of an accompanying grant component (for example, through the E5P fund, NEFCO or NIP). Additional sources being considered: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) Has a preliminary interest in supporting clusters with a high degree of readiness (project documentation, feasibility study). Combined financing is possible: loan + investment grant (through E5P). EBRD is considering the project within the framework of sectoral support for the development of the circular economy in Ukraine. World Bank (IBRD) With the support of the Ministry of Reconstruction of Ukraine, the World Bank has included one of the cluster projects in the long-term portfolio of infrastructure recovery initiatives. The possibility of obtaining a long-term investment loan is envisaged. European Investment Bank (EIB) Considering the project within the framework of the Urban Renewal and Waste Management Program in Ukraine. Possible participation in individual technical or infrastructure components (sorting stations, IT systems, logistics). Other potential sources (under development): E5P Fund – as a grant instrument that can cover up to 20% of the cost of individual components within the framework of co-financing with the EBRD or EIB. French and Swiss Embassies – in the context of supporting environmental projects at the municipal level (through AFD, SECO). Private investors / concessionaires – possibility of involvement at the operation stage of clusters (CHP operators, RDF producers). Participation of state and local budgets The state budget of Ukraine – can provide co-financing of up to 15% of the total cost of each project. Local budgets – their participation is expected in providing land plots, connecting to engineering infrastructure and supporting the preparatory stage. The advantage of the program is modularity and a typical feasibility study, which allows projects to be implemented quickly, on a scale and taking into account the standards of donor organizations. This significantly increases the attractiveness for external partners and investors, ensuring a high level of readiness to attract financing.

Management Case

Total program duration (months): 5

Approaches to project selection

Have approaches and criteria been defined for including public investment projects in the program, initiators of such projects, and their prioritization?

Yes

Organizational Measures

Management and Coordination Center

148 months

Monitoring, audit, environmental assessment

48 months

Transportation infrastructure, logistics, engineering networks

36 months

Installation and start-up of RDF/SRF CHP plants

36 months

Construction and launch of sorting lines + RDF/SRF production

36 months

IT monitoring system and digital management of solid waste flows

24 months

Personnel training and training centers

7 months

Development of typical feasibility studies (FES) for RDF/SRF clusters

6 months

Risk Assessment

Risk

Probability

Degree

Strategy

Risk

Compliance with EU standards, environmental impact assessment (EIA), environmental supervision.

Probability

Low

Degree

Considerable

Strategy

Reduction

Risk

Heat/power purchase contracts or long-term agreements with municipalities.

Probability

Medium

Degree

Considerable

Strategy

Transfer

Risk

Include PPP mechanisms, share risks with private operators/investors.

Probability

Medium

Degree

Considerable

Strategy

Transfer

Risk

Communicate with the public and explain the benefits of the circular economy.

Probability

Medium

Degree

Considerable

Strategy

Reduction

Risk

Taking into account the distance from the front line, duplication of logistics routes, backup CHP.

Probability

Medium

Degree

Critical

Strategy

Acceptance

Risk

Diversify funding sources, build reserves, and actively involve donors.

Probability

High

Degree

Critical

Strategy

Reduction

Risk

Attract leading designers, implement proven technologies, and conduct piloting.

Probability

Medium

Degree

Considerable

Strategy

Avoidance

Risk

Monitor policy changes, ensure broad interagency support.

Probability

Low

Degree

Considerable

Strategy

Reduction

Program Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProgram StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
15/08/2025SP-N-150825-72F19CC0State SPPreparationInclude--
01/10/2025SPP-N-011025-15444E5DState SPPPreparationInclude-68