Program for the modernization of the border infrastructure of Ukraine "Infrastructure of the Western Border of Ukraine"


Sector

Transport Sector

Stream

Development and expansion of border infrastructure with the countries of the European Union and the Republic of Moldova

Entry into Portfolio

State level of SP

General Information

Program Description

The Border Infrastructure Modernization Program of Ukraine is an important tool for increasing the efficiency, security and throughput capacity of state border crossing points. The Program provides for the implementation of six projects covering key road crossing points in the Transcarpathian, Volyn, Chernivtsi and Vinnytsia regions: Uzhhorod, Chop (Tisa), Yagodyn, Luzhanka, Porubne and Mogilev-Podilskyi.
The total amount of funding is 146.5 million euros. All projects are integrated into the TEN-T network - the trans-European transport network, which is the basis for strengthening Ukraine's logistical ties with the EU. The development of these facilities will significantly reduce congestion at the border, speed up freight transportation, improve the infrastructure of service areas for drivers and customs authorities, as well as increase energy efficiency and digitalization of data processing.
The program is of strategic importance for the country's post-war recovery, ensuring economic stability and further integration into the European economic space. It also meets Ukraine's priorities for European integration and strengthening transport connections with the world. Thanks to the support of international partners, in particular the European Investment Bank, the implementation of this program will become an impetus for the development of a new quality of infrastructure at the borders, which is extremely necessary in the context of growing humanitarian, trade and security challenges.

Strategic Case

Program Goal

Main Goal: Creation of new facilities and services
Secondary Goal: Modernization to comply with current standards, Ensuring inclusiveness and equal opportunities, Meeting growing demand, Improvement of infrastructure condition
Problems: Problems and results of their solution as a result of the project implementation The main problems that existed before the project implementation: - Low throughput capacity of the MAPP - Most of the crossing points were not designed for the current volume of freight and passenger traffic, which caused long queues, traffic jams and loss of time. - Outdated infrastructure and limited technical capabilities - The lack of modern terminals, service areas, engineering systems and canopies created inconvenience for users and did not meet the requirements of safety and comfort. - Insufficient quality of access roads - The poor condition of the roads leading to the crossing points led to delays, damage to transport and additional costs for carriers. - Low level of digitalization and automation - The lack of electronic queue management systems, customs control, smart surveillance slowed down the process of crossing the border. - Lack of integration into the EU logistics networks (TEN-T) - Limited inclusion in the trans-European transport network has hindered the development of the country's transit potential. Expected results of the program implementation: + Increase in throughput by 30–50% Thanks to new terminals, traffic lanes, optimized logistics and digital solutions. + Reduction of border crossing time by 40–60% By automating procedures, reconstructing infrastructure and creating service zones. + Improving infrastructure and traffic safety Construction of more than 30 km of new and upgraded roads, safe zones for drivers and passengers. + Integration into the TEN-T network All 6 facilities are included in the EU's priority logistics infrastructure, which strengthens Ukraine's economic integration. + Improving conditions for border and customs services Modern working premises, technical support and reduced workload on staff. + Increasing trust of businesses and citizens Thanks to transparent procedures, cost reduction, easier border crossing and improved services.

Strategic Relevance of the Program

Sector
Transport Sector
Subsector
Road Border Crossing Points
Stream
Development and expansion of border infrastructure with the countries of the European Union and the Republic of Moldova
Strategic Document
National Transport Strategy of Ukraine until 2030
Task
1 Development and expansion of border infrastructure with the countries of the European Union and the Republic of Moldova

Program Objectives

Indicator
Baseline Value
Target Value

Programme Sustainable Development Goals

Economic Case

Economic feasibility of the program

What are the main benefits expected from the implementation of the program for the economy, business, society, or individual industries?

Improving energy efficiency
Other benefits
Improving business conditions
Increasing employment levels, creating new jobs
Growth in production, market volumes of goods/services/investments
Reducing regional imbalances
Infrastructure development
Improving the quality of life of the population
Increase in budget revenues

Does the program objective provide for a contribution to the climate goal of mitigating the effects of climate change?

Reducing or avoiding greenhouse gas emissions
Reducing the use of fuel and energy resources

Does the program objective provide a contribution to the climate change adaptation objective: reducing the impact and/or reducing the vulnerability of an asset or population to one or more types of physical climate hazards?

Wind-related threats (change in wind regime; cyclone, hurricane, typhoon; storm, including blizzards, dust and sandstorms; tornado)
Temperature-related threats (changes in air, fresh water, seawater temperatures; heat stress; temperature fluctuations; heat waves; frost; forest fire)
Threats related to water resources (changes in the structure and types of precipitation (rain, hail, snow/ice); precipitation or hydrological variability; saltwater intrusion; sea level rise; water stress; drought, heavy precipitation (rain, hail, snow/ice); floods (coastal, river, pluvial, groundwater).

Does the programme objective provide for a contribution to the climate objective of sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources?

Increasing the efficiency of water resources use
Reducing the negative impact of urban and industrial wastewater discharges
Reducing drinking water pollution

Does the program objective provide for a contribution to the climate goal of transitioning to a circular economy?

Increasing the use of by-products and secondary raw materials, including by increasing the recyclability of products or waste
Reducing the content of hazardous substances and replacing substances of particular environmental concern in materials and products throughout their life cycle
Reducing the use of primary raw materials
Preventing or reducing waste generation

Does the programme objective provide for a contribution to the climate objective of pollution prevention and control?

Preventing or reducing emissions of pollutants into air, water or soil
Improving air, water or soil quality
Preventing or minimizing the negative impacts of the production, use or disposal of chemicals

Does the program objective provide for a contribution to the climate goal of protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems?

Nature conservation and biodiversity
Sustainable land use and management of land resources

What social consequences are relevant for your program, after its implementation?

Increasing employment levels
Improving living conditions
Improving access to basic services
Other social consequences
Reducing social inequality

Why is it advisable to implement projects in the format of one comprehensive program, and not separately?

Strengthening the overall impact through the interaction of individual projects within the program
Ability to simultaneously cover several interrelated aspects of a problem and ensure a systematic approach
Cost reduction through pooling of resources and centralized management
Implementing activities within a common or adjacent territory to achieve a more effective result
Ensuring coordinated planning, management and monitoring of projects within a single structure
The need to comply with legal requirements, government strategies or policies

How will the program help strengthen other economic processes or reforms?

Optimization of logistics or production chains
Promoting the development of related sectors of the economy
Support for the implementation of state or sectoral reforms
Deepening integration into international economic processes
Stimulating digitalization and innovation

Program Components

Financial justification

Total estimated program cost

6'705'000'000 UAH

Estimated cost of program components

6'705'000'000 UAH

Component

Amount

Creation/updating service zones for border crossing participants

1'152'000'000 UAH

Development of access transport infrastructure

3'782'400'000 UAH

Modernization of international road crossing points (IBPs)

1'770'600'000 UAH

Cost justification

Short description

Justification documents

n/a

Operations Plan, Strategy.pdf

Sources and mechanisms of financial support for the implementation of programs.

Status
Funding mechanisms
Coverage, %

Investment

Reimbursable financing. Debt financing. Loans borrowed by the state from foreign governments, foreign financial institutions, and IFIs

100%

Justification documents
To the documents
What potential funding sources can be mobilized on the basis of prior agreements or intentions to cooperate (if any)

European Investment Bank loans

Management Case

Total program duration (months): 24

Approaches to project selection

Have approaches and criteria been defined for including public investment projects in the program, initiators of such projects, and their prioritization?

Yes

Organizational Measures

2. Active implementation

18 months

1. Preparatory stage

6 months

3. Final stage

6 months

Risk Assessment

Risk

Probability

Degree

Strategy

Risk

Lack of suppliers of modern materials or technologies

Probability

Low

Degree

Minor

Strategy

Avoidance

Risk

Inflation, rising costs of materials and work

Probability

Medium

Degree

Considerable

Strategy

Avoidance

Risk

Insufficient community support or conflicts of interest

Probability

Low

Degree

Minor

Strategy

Avoidance

Risk

Failure to meet deadlines or disagreement between performers

Probability

Medium

Degree

Minor

Strategy

Avoidance

Risk

Complexity of infrastructure design and integration

Probability

Medium

Degree

Considerable

Strategy

Avoidance

Risk

Shortage of funds or delays in budget funding

Probability

Medium

Degree

Critical

Strategy

Avoidance

Risk

Changes in the regulatory or legislative environment

Probability

Medium

Degree

Considerable

Strategy

Avoidance

Risk

Risk of environmental damage during restoration

Probability

Low

Degree

Critical

Strategy

Avoidance

Program Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProgram StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
20/03/2026SP-N-200326-D1674943State SPPreparationInclude--