Program for the modernization of the border infrastructure of Ukraine "Infrastructure of the Western Border of Ukraine"
Transport Sector
Development and expansion of border infrastructure with the countries of the European Union and the Republic of Moldova
State level of SP
General Information
Program Description
The Border Infrastructure Modernization Program of Ukraine is an important tool for increasing the efficiency, security and throughput capacity of state border crossing points. The Program provides for the implementation of six projects covering key road crossing points in the Transcarpathian, Volyn, Chernivtsi and Vinnytsia regions: Uzhhorod, Chop (Tisa), Yagodyn, Luzhanka, Porubne and Mogilev-Podilskyi.
The total amount of funding is 146.5 million euros. All projects are integrated into the TEN-T network - the trans-European transport network, which is the basis for strengthening Ukraine's logistical ties with the EU. The development of these facilities will significantly reduce congestion at the border, speed up freight transportation, improve the infrastructure of service areas for drivers and customs authorities, as well as increase energy efficiency and digitalization of data processing.
The program is of strategic importance for the country's post-war recovery, ensuring economic stability and further integration into the European economic space. It also meets Ukraine's priorities for European integration and strengthening transport connections with the world. Thanks to the support of international partners, in particular the European Investment Bank, the implementation of this program will become an impetus for the development of a new quality of infrastructure at the borders, which is extremely necessary in the context of growing humanitarian, trade and security challenges.
Strategic Case
Program Goal
Strategic Relevance of the Program
Program Objectives
Programme Sustainable Development Goals
Economic Case
Economic feasibility of the program
What are the main benefits expected from the implementation of the program for the economy, business, society, or individual industries?
Does the program objective provide for a contribution to the climate goal of mitigating the effects of climate change?
Does the program objective provide a contribution to the climate change adaptation objective: reducing the impact and/or reducing the vulnerability of an asset or population to one or more types of physical climate hazards?
Does the programme objective provide for a contribution to the climate objective of sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources?
Does the program objective provide for a contribution to the climate goal of transitioning to a circular economy?
Does the programme objective provide for a contribution to the climate objective of pollution prevention and control?
Does the program objective provide for a contribution to the climate goal of protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems?
What social consequences are relevant for your program, after its implementation?
Why is it advisable to implement projects in the format of one comprehensive program, and not separately?
How will the program help strengthen other economic processes or reforms?
Program Components
Component ID
DREAM-3
Creation/updating service zones for border crossing participants
Justification
Improving waiting conditions, reducing the social burden on border communities, and improving the quality of service.
Year
Amount
3
1'152'000'000 UAH
Component ID
DREAM-2
Development of access transport infrastructure
Justification
Access roads to the MAPP are often in poor condition or unsuitable for heavy-duty transport. Their reconstruction/construction will: improve logistics; ensure uninterrupted traffic; reduce the burden on urban centers; and reduce road maintenance costs for carriers and the state.
Year
Amount
3
3'782'400'000 UAH
Component ID
DREAM-1
Modernization of international road crossing points (IBPs)
Justification
Existing border crossing points do not meet the growing load and have outdated infrastructure that hampers export-import operations. Modernization will allow: to increase throughput by 30–50%; to reduce border crossing time by 40–60%; to improve conditions for drivers, customs officers, and border guards; to increase the level of security and service.
Year
Amount
3
1'770'600'000 UAH
Financial justification
Total estimated program cost
6'705'000'000 UAH
Estimated cost of program components
6'705'000'000 UAH
Component
Amount
Creation/updating service zones for border crossing participants
1'152'000'000 UAH
Development of access transport infrastructure
3'782'400'000 UAH
Modernization of international road crossing points (IBPs)
1'770'600'000 UAH
Sources and mechanisms of financial support for the implementation of programs.
Status
Funding mechanisms
Coverage, %
Investment
Reimbursable financing. Debt financing. Loans borrowed by the state from foreign governments, foreign financial institutions, and IFIs
100%
Justification documents
What potential funding sources can be mobilized on the basis of prior agreements or intentions to cooperate (if any)
European Investment Bank loans
Management Case
Total program duration (months): 24
Approaches to project selection
Have approaches and criteria been defined for including public investment projects in the program, initiators of such projects, and their prioritization?
Organizational Measures
2. Active implementation
18 months
1. Preparatory stage
6 months
3. Final stage
6 months
Risk Assessment
Risk
Probability
Degree
Strategy
Risk
Lack of suppliers of modern materials or technologies
Probability
Low
Degree
Minor
Strategy
Avoidance
Risk
Inflation, rising costs of materials and work
Probability
Medium
Degree
Considerable
Strategy
Avoidance
Risk
Insufficient community support or conflicts of interest
Probability
Low
Degree
Minor
Strategy
Avoidance
Risk
Failure to meet deadlines or disagreement between performers
Probability
Medium
Degree
Minor
Strategy
Avoidance
Risk
Complexity of infrastructure design and integration
Probability
Medium
Degree
Considerable
Strategy
Avoidance
Risk
Shortage of funds or delays in budget funding
Probability
Medium
Degree
Critical
Strategy
Avoidance
Risk
Changes in the regulatory or legislative environment
Probability
Medium
Degree
Considerable
Strategy
Avoidance
Risk
Risk of environmental damage during restoration
Probability
Low
Degree
Critical
Strategy
Avoidance