Reconstruction of the catering unit and dining room of Artsyz supporting educational institution No. 1 - lyceum with primary school and gymnasium of Artsyz city council at the address: 15g Budivelnykiv St., Artsyz city, Bolgrad district, Odesa region


Sector
Education and science
Stream
Ensuring access to high-quality and safe food in educational institutions through the development of modern canteen infrastructure (food blocks)
Maturity level
77
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The success of students in school and their comprehensive development depends on health. The key to this is, first of all, high-quality and proper nutrition. The school cafeteria of Artsyz Lyceum No. 1 is located in a building on the second floor, which has never undergone major repairs. There is no modern equipment and inventory. Therefore, the modernization of the catering unit is urgently needed. Engineering communications are outdated, mold has appeared. In addition, the equipment from the Soviet era consumes an excessive amount of electricity. Updating the material and technical base will make it possible to quickly and qualitatively prepare dishes in accordance with the requirements of the food safety management system (HACCP), comply with sanitary and hygienic requirements, expand the range of dishes, increase the productivity of the cafeteria staff, reduce water and electricity consumption, and allow students to eat healthy, high-quality and varied food. Artsyz Lyceum No. 1 is attended by 556 students. Therefore, the issue of overhaul and modernization of the catering unit is extremely urgent for us!

The purpose of the project

Main Goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of people who will use the service

556 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Education and science

Subsector

School education

Stream

Ensuring access to high-quality and safe food in educational institutions through the development of modern canteen infrastructure (food blocks)

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

2.1 2.1.2 Creating conditions for access to quality education

Project objectives

Project objectives were not specified by the initiator

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Оцінка попиту на реконструкцію харчоблоку та їдальні здійснювалася на основі аналізу фактичної наповненості закладу, технічного стану приміщень, санітарних вимог та очікувань громади щодо якості шкільного харчування.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
500 human
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?

No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?

Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

None of the options are applicable

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Envisaged training or advanced training for women in the private sector
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?

None of the options are applicable

Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?

None of the options are applicable

Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?

None of the options are applicable

Documents

Name
Date
School_Food_Blocks (1).pdf
30.09.2025
20:39:02 UTC
672_KD_ZKR.pdf
26.12.2025
19:36:11 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Reconstruction of the catering unit and dining room

Technical Solution 2

New construction of a separate catering building

Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)24'179'858 UAH16'200'000 UAH
For preparation495'776 UAH1'200'000 UAH
For implementation23'684'082 UAH15'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost2'148'039 UAH2'000'000 UAH
For operation948'317 UAH1'000'000 UAH
For closing1'199'722 UAH1'000'000 UAH
Average annual costs1'000'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.13 months13 months
Deadline for developing a FFS1 month1 month
Implementation period12 months12 months
Service life600 months30 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active

[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Rejected

[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Components of a technical solution
To components
1
To components
0

Commercial Justification

Supplier and contractor market assessment

Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
Для реалізації проєкту обрано стратегію відкритих торгів через систему Prozorro, що забезпечує конкурентність, прозорість, економію бюджетних коштів та відповідність вимогам законодавства у сфері публічних закупівель.

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
Планується застосування відкритих електронних торгів через систему Prozorro, чітке технічне завдання, незалежний моніторинг, а також оцінка пропозицій за критеріями ціни, якості та строків виконання.

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
Open competitive bidding

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Competitive dialogue

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Pre-market engagement
Попереднє залучення ринку здійснювалося через аналіз відкритих тендерів у Prozorro, консультації з експертами, вивчення аналогічних проєктів та прямі запити до постачальників.

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Potential market participants
Проведено консультації з регіональними постачальниками обладнання, будівельними компаніями та технічними експертами; очікується середній рівень конкуренції, потенційними учасниками є сертифіковані підрядники з досвідом у освітній інфраструктурі, постачальники кухонного обладнання, а також консультанти з впровадження НАССР.

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Market readiness assessment
The market shows sufficient readiness: qualified contractors are available, certified equipment and technologies are available; potential barriers may include regulatory approvals, fluctuations in building materials prices, and limited competition in certain segments.

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial justification

Total project budget

Total preliminary budget26'327'897 UAH18'200'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)24'179'858 UAH16'200'000 UAH
For preparation495'776 UAH1'200'000 UAH
For implementation23'684'082 UAH15'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost2'148'039 UAH2'000'000 UAH
For operation948'317 UAH1'000'000 UAH
For closing1'199'722 UAH1'000'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Average project cost per service recipient

Service Unitучень
Service Unit Cost42'125 UAH

Profitability of the project

Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Is the project self-sustaining?No

Availability of services

Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
No – analysis not performed

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Financing Mechanisms

Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

Source and MechanismYesNo

Funding Sources

Approved Funds2'418'000 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds2'418'000 UAH0 UAH

Public-private partnership

Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Management Rationale

Team competencies

Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - economic analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - communication with stakeholders

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - risk management

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - social and gender analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - public consultations

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of available procurement options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - legal support

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial analysis - financial analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - demand analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - environmental expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of the market environment

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Yes, negotiations are already underway.

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
No

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
None of the options are applicable
Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
No

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Risk assessment

Technical riskDefinedUndefined
Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Social riskDefinedUndefined

Organizational events

ResponseDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?

None of the options are applicable

Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

None of the options are applicable
Need for financing

Does the project require additional funding for preparation?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
18/12/2025SP-L-181225-D8103B17Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyCancellation of the decision to include in a joint venture--
22/12/2025SP-L-221225-77801593Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyCancellation of the decision to include in a joint venture--
28/12/2025SP-L-281225-D9C652CBCommunity SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
13/02/2026SP-N-130226-9D89CD3BState SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
22/12/2025SPP-L-221225-D26819DECommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyNot approvedno export assessment has been carried out-
30/12/2025SPP-L-301225-CC007C9FCommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-77