Major repairs of the anti-radiation shelter at the address: Kherson region, Beryslav district, Velyka Oleksandrivka village, Svobody street* damaged as a result of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation


Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Development and rehabilitation of municipal infrastructure of subnational governments
Maturity level
86
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project for the overhaul of the radiation shelter provides for a complex of construction works aimed at the complete restoration, modernization of engineering networks and structural elements to ensure the protection of people from ionizing radiation and other damaging factors. The project involves the restoration of protective properties, replacement of worn-out structures, and ensuring safe conditions (ventilation, water supply, bathrooms).

Main works: Structural: Repair/strengthening of load-bearing walls, foundation, waterproofing of floors and walls to prevent flooding. Engineering networks: Installation of forced ventilation systems (with filters), arrangement of water supply, sewage, power supply (lighting and power). Safety: Arrangement of main and emergency (evacuation) exits, installation of hermetic doors and protective screens. Interior decoration: Antiseptic treatment, repair of walls, floors, creation of bathrooms and places for sitting/lying. Documentation: Mandatory development of design and estimate documentation (DED) and examination. Result: Commissioning of a functional shelter that complies with DBN standards.

The purpose of the project

Main Goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards

Secondary Goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards, Rebuilding the damaged/destroyed, Improving the equality of wealth distribution, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Ensuring inclusiveness and equal opportunities, Improving the quality of services

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The main goal of the project: creating a safe, sealed and autonomous environment to protect the civilian population from: Ionizing radiation. Combustion products and toxic substances. Fragments and shock wave action. Side effects of the use of weapons of mass destruction. 2. Ways to achieve the goal (Implementation steps): Technical strengthening and sealing: Replacing old doors with certified protective-sealed doors, strengthening ceilings, repairing entrances and exits. Result: Complete isolation of the internal space from the external environment. B. Modernization of life support systems: Installation of modern supply and exhaust ventilation with filter absorbers, installation of reserve water tanks and updating sewage pumps. Result: The ability of people to stay in the shelter for more than 48 hours without external assistance. B. Energy autonomy: Connecting a diesel generator or installing powerful inverters with batteries, installing emergency (battery) lighting. Result: Operation of ventilation and lighting even in the event of a complete blackout. D. Ensuring inclusivity and sanitation: Arrangement of ramps, widening of doorways, repair of bathrooms taking into account the needs of low-mobility groups. Result: Unobstructed access and comfortable stay for all categories of citizens. 3. Success criteria (Result) The project is considered implemented if the facility receives a positive act of readiness from the State Emergency Service of Ukraine (SES), and the structure is included in the register of protective structures as suitable for operation.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

As a result of the project, the protection of participants in the municipal institution and residents of the settlement from the effects of radiation emissions and chemical attacks will be ensured, and the percentage of population safety will increase.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of IDP users

200 human

Number of people who will use the service

200 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Municipal infrastructure and services

Subsector

Development and Reconstruction of Subnational Infrastructure

Stream

Development and rehabilitation of municipal infrastructure of subnational governments

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

1.1.2 Ensure the development of cultural and local heritage protection centers that form local self-awareness and bind residents to their places of residence

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
Number of repaired radiation shelters
0 units
1 units
The share of human lives saved in the event of an emergency during the period of martial law and states of emergency
0 %
100 %

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

застосовується комплексна методологія, що базується на чинних ДБН (Державних будівельних нормах), протипожежних вимог ДСНС та методиках Міністерства розвитку громад та територій України.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
100 %
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Justification of the mechanisms for financial support of the project.docx
03.02.2026
13:30:10 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Major repairs of the anti-radiation shelter at the address: Kherson region, Beryslav district, Velyka Oleksandrivka village, Svobody street* damaged as a result of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation

Technical Solution 2

Current repairs of a radiation shelter in a non-residential building

Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)11'400'000 UAH753'000 UAH
For preparation400'000 UAH3'000 UAH
For implementation11'000'000 UAH750'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost3'300'001 UAH2'250'001 UAH
For operation3'300'000 UAH2'250'000 UAH
For closing1 UAH1 UAH
Average annual costs165'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.13 months7 months
Deadline for developing a FFS1 month1 month
Implementation period12 months6 months
Service life240 months36 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active

[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Rejected

[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Components of a technical solution
To components
0
To components
0

Commercial Justification

Supplier and contractor market assessment

Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, both national and international

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial justification

Total project budget

Total preliminary budget14'700'001 UAH3'003'001 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)11'400'000 UAH753'000 UAH
For preparation400'000 UAH3'000 UAH
For implementation11'000'000 UAH750'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost3'300'001 UAH2'250'001 UAH
For operation3'300'000 UAH2'250'000 UAH
For closing1 UAH1 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Average project cost per service recipient

Service Unitна одного отримувача
Service Unit Cost55'000 UAH

Profitability of the project

Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo

Availability of services

Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Financing Mechanisms

Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

Source and MechanismYesNo

Funding Sources

Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH

Public-private partnership

Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

None of the options are applicable

Project Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
04/02/2026SP-L-040226-A7F9FF33Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeStrategic fit confirmed-
11/02/2026SPP-L-110226-896D0ACACommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeStrategic fit confirmed86