Reconstruction of the water supply system on Tsentralna Street, Trudova Street, Styike Village, Beryslav District, Kherson Region (damaged as a result of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation)
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Development and rehabilitation of municipal infrastructure of subnational governments
Maturity level
88
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
The project envisages the reconstruction of the water supply system damaged as a result of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation, in particular, the replacement of the combined household, drinking, and fire-fighting water supply system for street consumers in the settlement. It is envisaged to use the recommended pipe material and carry out other measures and works regarding water wells, water supply units, and ensuring external fire extinguishing. Construction and installation work on the reconstruction is envisaged in one turn.
The purpose of the project
Main Goal:
Rebuilding the damaged/destroyed
Secondary Goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards, Increasing compliance with modern standards, Improving the equality of wealth distribution, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Improving the quality of services
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
Restoration of the water supply network system damaged as a result of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation, provision of uninterrupted water supply services
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
As a result of the implementation of the project, the reconstruction of the water supply network will resolve the issue of providing uninterrupted water supply in the settlement.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Number of people who will use the service
357 human
Number of IDP users
92 human
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Subsector
Development and Reconstruction of Subnational Infrastructure
Stream
Development and rehabilitation of municipal infrastructure of subnational governments
Strategic document
Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади
Task
1.1.2 Ensure the development of cultural and local heritage protection centers that form local self-awareness and bind residents to their places of residence
Project objectives
Indicator
Base value
Target value
Share of population that will be provided with uninterrupted water supply
0 %
100 %
Share of equipment that will be restored as a result of the project implementation
0 %
100 %
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Demand for the service and its dynamics
What methodology was used to estimate demand?
застосовується комплексна методологія, що базується на чинних ДБН (Державних будівельних нормах) та методиках Міністерства розвитку громад та територій України.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
100 %
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
Reconstruction of the water supply system on Tsentralna Street, Trudova Street, Styike Village, Beryslav District, Kherson Region (damaged as a result of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation)
Technical Solution 2
Current repairs of the water supply system in the village of Styike (damaged as a result of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation)
Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)44'721'575 UAH402'000 UAH
For preparation623'819 UAH2'000 UAH
For implementation44'097'756 UAH400'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost20'124'709 UAH12'001 UAH
For operation20'124'708 UAH12'000 UAH
For closing1 UAH1 UAH
Average annual costs661'466 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.13 months3 months
Deadline for developing a FFS1 month1 month
Implementation period12 months2 months
Service life360 months24 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, both national and international
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget64'846'284 UAH414'001 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)44'721'575 UAH402'000 UAH
For preparation623'819 UAH2'000 UAH
For implementation44'097'756 UAH400'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost20'124'709 UAH12'001 UAH
For operation20'124'708 UAH12'000 UAH
For closing1 UAH1 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service Unitодиниця
Service Unit Cost49'548 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
No – analysis not performed
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds623'819 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds623'819 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
02/02/2026SP-L-020226-3055610ACommunity SPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeStrategic fit confirmed-
11/02/2026SPP-L-110226-D52C01DACommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeStrategic fit confirmed88