Construction of a drainage system from the intersection of Robocha Street and Brovarska Street to the floodplain of the stream in the village of Mankivka, Uman district, Cherkasy region

Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Restoration, development and modernization of centralized water supply and wastewater infrastructure, including the introduction of alternative energy sources
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

Work will be carried out on municipal land within the boundaries between private territories. Given the lack of street facilities, the need to ensure maximum water flow, and easy access to the system during operation, the most effective drainage system under such conditions will be a reinforced concrete lot structure. The adopted design solutions will increase the level of safety for vehicles and pedestrians, improve the transport and operational conditions of the roadway during the inter-repair periods of street closures, and ensure constant and proper drainage.

The purpose of the project

Main Goal:

Improving the condition of infrastructure

Secondary Goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The adopted design solutions will increase the level of safety for vehicles and pedestrians, improve the transport and operational indicators of the condition of the roadway during the period of operation between repairs on the streets, and ensure constant and proper drainage.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

Climate change is increasingly causing spontaneous torrential downpours. which negatively affects the existing water flow, namely flooding, erosion, and littering of the surrounding area. Therefore, it is necessary to make decisions aimed at preserving water resources, restoring and organizing recreational areas, methods of maintaining ecosystems in combination with ensuring normal living conditions for the population.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Capital expenditure per year

1282.33 thous. UAH

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Municipal infrastructure and services

Subsector

Water supply and sanitation

Stream

Restoration, development and modernization of centralized water supply and wastewater infrastructure, including the introduction of alternative energy sources

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

2.3.3. Improving the landscaping of the community

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
Drainage construction
0.03 km
0.24 km

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

None of the options are applicable

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

None of the options are applicable

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Summary estimate.pdf
06.11.2025
12:40:06 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Construction of a drainage system from the intersection of Robocha Street and Brovarska Street to the floodplain of the stream in the village of Mankivka, Uman district, Cherkasy region

Technical Solution 2

Construction of a drainage system from the intersection of Robocha Street and Brovarska Street to the floodplain of the stream in the village of Mankivka, Uman district, Cherkasy region

Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)1'200'301 UAH1'051'520 UAH
For preparation54'214 UAH153'880 UAH
For implementation1'146'087 UAH897'640 UAH
Project operation and closure cost82'043 UAH76'940 UAH
For operation51'255 UAH51'290 UAH
For closing30'788 UAH25'650 UAH
Average annual costs38'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.9 months2 months
Deadline for developing a FFS7 months1 month
Implementation period2 months1 month
Service life360 months360 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active

[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Unsuccessful

[The technical approach was analyzed and considered for implementation but was not selected as the final option.]

Components of a technical solution
To components
1
To components
0

Commercial Justification

Supplier and contractor market assessment

Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial justification

Total project budget

Total preliminary budget1'282'344 UAH1'128'460 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)1'200'301 UAH1'051'520 UAH
For preparation54'214 UAH153'880 UAH
For implementation1'146'087 UAH897'640 UAH
Project operation and closure cost82'043 UAH76'940 UAH
For operation51'255 UAH51'290 UAH
For closing30'788 UAH25'650 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Average project cost per service recipient

Service UnitВартість проєктуВартість проєкту
Service Unit Cost128'234'400 UAH128'234'400 UAH

Profitability of the project

Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo

Availability of services

Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Financing Mechanisms

Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

Source and MechanismYesYes

Funding Sources

Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH

Public-private partnership

Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

No, no assessment was conducted.

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Management Rationale

Team competencies

Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Business case - analysis of available procurement options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial analysis - financial analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of available procurement options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial analysis - financial analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
No, this is the first project of its kind.

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

No, this is the first project of its kind.

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Management rationale - project management

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Management rationale - project management

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Partially, we are considering options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Risk assessment

Technical riskDefinedDefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

None of the options are applicable

Project Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
24/11/2025SP-L-241125-65029068Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--