New construction of the road from the village of Anatolivka to the village of Novofedorivka within the boundaries of the Koblivska community of the Mykolaiv region


Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Improving transport accessibility and connectivity between settlements of the community, improving the condition of municipal roads (new construction of the Anatolivka-Fedorivka road)
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project involves the construction of a new road between the villages of Anatolivka and Novofedorivka, about 3 km long, with a hard surface. Currently, residents of Anatolivka use a bypass route of over 40 km, the surface of which does not meet quality standards. Since the local school was closed as part of the optimization, it was decided to provide their transportation to school in Novofedorivka. The existing dirt road from Anatolivka to Novofedorivka is unsuitable for safe and regular travel, especially during the rainy season. The implementation of the project will solve the problem of accessibility of education and transport, ensure safe and convenient transportation of children to school, shorten the distance between villages from 40 km to 3 km, and reduce the level of social tension in the community.

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Creation of new facilities and services

Secondary goal:

Improving the condition of infrastructure, Improving the quality of services

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The goal of the project is to ensure safe and convenient transportation of children from Anatolivka to school in Novofedorivka by building a new road about 3 km long. This will create conditions for quick transportation, ensure access of children from Anatolivka to educational services at the Novofedorivka school, improve population mobility and promote socio-economic development of the community. Ways to achieve the goal: development and approval of design and estimate documentation for road construction; performance of construction and installation works; provision of technical and author's supervision over the implementation of the project; commissioning of the facility with subsequent transfer to the balance of the road holder. Justification of the gap: Current status - between Anatolivka and Novofedorivka there is only a dirt field road, unsuitable for safe movement throughout the year. Due to the lack of quality road connections, residents are forced to travel more than 40 km on a bypass route, which complicates children's access to school, as well as the movement of community residents. Target level - the construction of a modern paved road with a length of about 3 km will ensure year-round safe traffic, reduce distances by more than 13 times, provide access to educational, social and administrative services, as well as create conditions for the development of the local economy.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

Between the villages of Anatolivka and Novofedorivka there is a dirt field road with a length of about 3 km. The lack of hard surface and dependence on weather conditions make it unsuitable for regular use, complicate children's access to school and other services and force them to use a bypass route over 40 km long. This creates social and transport constraints that need to be eliminated by building a new road.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of people who will use the service

51 human

Population in the geographical area of influence of the project

1461 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Municipal infrastructure and services

Subsector

Development and Reconstruction of Subnational Infrastructure

Stream

Improving transport accessibility and connectivity between settlements of the community, improving the condition of municipal roads (new construction of the Anatolivka-Fedorivka road)

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

2.2.1.2. 2.2.1.2. Construction, capital and current repairs of roads between settlements of the community

Project objectives

Project objectives were not specified by the initiator

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Комбінований підхід: кількісний та якісний метод.

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

No

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes

У проєкті враховано демографічні та економічні прогнози. Зниження чисельності населення та негативний природний приріст вказують на необхідність покращення транспортної доступності для підтримки соціальної інфраструктури та забезпечення рівного доступу до освітніх послуг у селі. Економічні прогнози свідчать про необхідність розвитку інфраструктури для підтримки економічної активності населення.

Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
0 km
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
18 human
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
2
3 km
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
2
51 human
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Not provided

Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Будівництво нової дороги створить безпечну транспортну інфраструктуру, що зменшить витрати пального, скоротить відстані та час руху, сприяючи зниженню викидів парникових газів та покращенню стану довкілля.

Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Передбачає потенційний позитивний внесок у досягнення кліматичних та довкіллєвих цілей у частині запобігання та контролю забруднення, оскільки передбачає застосування заходів для мінімізації негативного впливу на довкілля під час будівництва та експлуатації дороги.

Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Not provided

Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Забезпечення проєктування з урахуванням екологічних стандартів, застосування заходів з мінімізації впливу на природні екосистеми, а також створення умов для збереження місцевого біорізноманіття шляхом раціонального планування та відновлення прилеглих територій після завершення робіт.

Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Ні, проєкт не має суттєвого внеску у кліматичні чи довкіллєві цілі, оскільки його основна мета - нове будівництво нової дороги, а не масштабна екологічна трансформація.

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

The project may result in the forced displacement of women, men and other gender groups or loss of access to resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Other gender risks
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
There are risks of impaired mobility or safety for women, men and other gender groups during construction/operation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
There is a risk of reduced economic opportunities for women, men and other gender groups (e.g. loss of jobs or retail outlets)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Other benefits from project implementation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Envisaged training or advanced training for women in the private sector
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Economic analysis.docx
15.11.2025
16:11:24 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

New construction of the road from the village of Anatolivka to the village of Novofedorivka

Technical Solution 2

Do not build a new road from the village of Anatolivka to the village of Novofedorivka

Total costs9'000'000 UAH4 UAH
  • For preparation
  • 500'000 UAH1 UAH
  • For implementation
  • 8'300'000 UAH1 UAH
  • For operation
  • 199'999 UAH1 UAH
  • For closing
  • 1 UAH1 UAH
    Average annual costs180'000 UAH1 UAH
    Project duration, incl.11 months2 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
  • 5 months1 month
  • Implementation period
  • 6 months1 month
    Service life120 months1 month
    Target indicatorsDefined Defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active

    [The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Rejected

    [The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Components of a technical solution
    To components
    1
    To components
    0

    Commercial Justification

    Supplier and contractor market assessment

    Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Конкуренція буде забезпечена через проведення відкритих торгів на платформі ProZorro, що стимулюватиме учасників пропонувати інноваційні та якісні рішення за конкурентною ціною.

    Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Проєкт має технічні та фінансові умови, що дозволяють залучати малі та середні підприємства для виконання окремих робіт,

    Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Проєкт орієнтований переважно на залучення місцевих і регіональних підрядників та постачальників, оскільки невеликий масштаб робіт робить його менш цікавим для міжнародних учасників.

    Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Було проведено аналіз аналогічних закупівель, який показав, що даний вид робіт підпадає під процедуру відкритих торгів.

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget9'000'000 UAH4 UAH
    Capital costs9'000'000 UAH4 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation500'000 UAH1 UAH
    For implementation8'300'000 UAH1 UAH
    For operation199'999 UAH1 UAH
    For closing1 UAH1 UAH
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service UnitВартість 1 км будівництва
    Service Unit Cost3'000'000 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?

    ResponseNoNo

    Availability of services

    Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
    Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Funding Sources

    Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
    Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH

    Public-private partnership

    Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
    No, no assessment was conducted.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management Rationale

    Team competencies

    Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
    Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - economic analysis

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - communication with stakeholders

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - risk management

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - social and gender analysis

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - public consultations

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of available procurement options

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - legal support

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial analysis - financial analysis

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - demand analysis

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - environmental expertise

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of the market environment

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
    Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
    Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - social and gender analysis

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic justification - forming a justification for the problem and need

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management rationale - public consultation

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of the market environment

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - environmental expertise

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management rationale - project management

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management rationale - communication with stakeholders

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of available procurement options

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - economic analysis

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management justification - other

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial analysis - financial analysis

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management rationale - risk management

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - demand analysis

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management rationale - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management justification - legal support

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
    Partially, we are considering options

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Risk assessment

    Financial riskDefinedUndefined
    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

    Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

    Other
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
    Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
    Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of the feasibility study
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
    Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]