Reconstruction of part of non-residential premises for the center for providing administrative services at 63 Respublikansky St. in Kremenchuk


Sector
Public services and related digitalization
Stream
Development of a network of administrative service centers
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project for the reconstruction of premises at 63 Respublikanska Street in Kremenchuk is a strategic step for the development of the right-bank part of the city (Rakivka microdistrict). The transformation of non-residential premises into a modern Administrative Services Center (ASC) is aimed at decentralizing services and improving their accessibility for residents. The project involves a complete transformation of the existing space in accordance with the principles of "open office" and inclusivity: redevelopment of premises, engineering modernization, inclusive environment, digital integration, and design of premises. The implementation of this facility allows eliminating a number of critical inconveniences: territorial remoteness (residents of Rakivka no longer need to cross the bridge over the Dnipro to receive basic services (passport procedures, property or business registration, social payments); load on the head office (opening a branch allows redistributing the flow of visitors, which reduces waiting times in the city's central ASN); inefficient use of municipal property (reconstruction of abandoned or non-residential premises turns them into an asset that benefits the community). After the facility is put into operation, the following indicators are predicted: improvement of service quality by reducing waiting time in line and the time for providing one service; social stability due to an increase in the level of satisfaction of residents of the microdistrict due to the proximity of state services to their place of residence; economic efficiency - optimization of building maintenance costs through the use of energy-saving technologies; scalability - the possibility of constantly expanding the list of services.

The purpose of the project

Main Goal:

Improving the quality of services

Secondary Goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards, Increasing compliance with modern standards, Creation of new facilities and services, Improving the equality of wealth distribution, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Introducing innovations and energy-efficient solutions, Creation of new jobs through project implementation, Reducing territorial or social gaps, Meeting demand

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The main goal is to ensure equal, barrier-free and prompt access of residents of the Rakivka microdistrict to the full range of state and municipal services in comfortable conditions. 1. Strategic components of the goal: Territorial decentralization: Bringing service points closer to the place of residence of more than 30-40 thousand citizens (the right-bank population). Serviceability: Transition from the Soviet model of the "office" system to the "open space" model. Inclusivity: Creating an environment where people with disabilities, parents with wheelchairs and the elderly receive services without outside assistance. 2. Methods of achieving the goal (implementation mechanisms) To achieve the target level of service quality during the implementation of the investment project, the following methods are used: Technological modernization: Implementation of automated data exchange systems between registers, which minimizes the number of paper certificates that the applicant must provide. Optimization of architectural and planning solutions: Use of zoning (reception, waiting area, service area, children's corner, self-service area with Internet access). Implementation of "Diya. Center" standards: Unification of visual style and service regulations, which guarantees predictable and high quality of service. Energy efficiency as a tool for sustainability: Reconstruction involves thermal modernization, which reduces budget costs for maintaining the facility, allowing to direct the released funds to the development of services. Human resources: Training staff in the principles of communication ethics and working with complex requests. 3. Justification of the gap between the current and target state The existing "gap" is the distance between how services are provided now and how they should be provided according to state standards. The current state is characterized by geographical and physical inequality in access to public services. The gap is that a significant part of the community is deprived of the opportunity to receive a service "here and now" without additional time and transportation costs. The implementation of the project at 63 Respublikanska Street completely eliminates this gap, transforming a remote area into a self-sufficient service hub.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

Key issues that need to be addressed Geographical isolation of the microdistrict: Rakivka is far from the central ASN, and the only administrative point of the ASN existing in the Right Bank part of the city does not have a convenient transport interchange with the Rakivka microdistrict and is located in a building where it is impossible to provide a full range of administrative services. A trip across the Kryukiv Bridge (the only transport artery) takes a lot of time and depends on traffic jams or repair work. Excessive load on the main office: The Central ASN is operating at the limit of its capacity, which leads to an increase in waiting times in queues for all residents of the community. Relevance of the problems right now Increasing demand for services: Due to migration processes and the need to process social benefits, IDP statuses and compensation for damaged property, the load on the administrative services system has increased several times. Transport risks: The Kryukiv Bridge is a critical infrastructure object with limited resources. Ensuring the autonomy of the right-bank part of the city is a matter of strategic sustainability of the community. Digitalization requirements: State policy is aimed at the "Action. Center" format, which requires the presence of modern technical hubs in each large microdistrict. Consequences in case of failure to resolve problems (risks) Social tension: Residents of Rakivka will feel "cut off" from high-quality city services, which reduces the level of trust in local authorities. Deterioration of accessibility of services: For low-mobility groups of the population, obtaining a passport or subsidy turns into a difficult test, which is actually a restriction of their rights. Economic losses: Time spent by citizens on the road and in queues is a lost economic resource. In addition, further destruction of non-residential premises without reconstruction will lead to an increase in the cost of their restoration in the future. Expected positive changes For citizens: receiving services within 15 minutes of accessibility; comfortable waiting conditions; full barrier-free. For the city: unloading the transport network (fewer trips through the bridge); rational use of municipal property. For the ASC system: increasing the speed of document processing; introduction of new services (passport services) directly in the district.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of people who will use the service

40000 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Public services and related digitalization

Subsector

State administrative services

Stream

Development of a network of administrative service centers

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

D.1.3. Providing quality services through ASCs

Project objectives

Project objectives were not specified by the initiator

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Аналіз звернень за наданням адміністративних послуг Департаменту «Центр надання адміністративних послуг» Кременчуцької міської ради Кременчуцького району Полтавської області
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
40000 human
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Economic analysis of the Central Administrative Service of the Republic of Kazakhstan.PDF
28.03.2026
13:54:59 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Reconstruction of part of non-residential premises for the center for providing administrative services at 63 Respublikansky St. in Kremenchuk

Technical Solution 2

Major renovation of part of non-residential premises for the administrative services center at 63 Respublikansky St. in Kremenchuk

Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)5'983'515 UAH4'200'000 UAH
For preparation368'107 UAH200'000 UAH
For implementation5'615'408 UAH4'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost4'026'927 UAH5'000'000 UAH
For operation4'026'927 UAH5'000'000 UAH
Average annual costs4'026'927 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.9 months7 months
Deadline for developing a FFS4 months3 months
Implementation period5 months4 months
Service life480 months240 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active

[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Rejected

[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Components of a technical solution
To components
1
To components
0

Commercial Justification

Supplier and contractor market assessment

Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, both national and international

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial justification

Total project budget

Total preliminary budget10'010'442 UAH9'200'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)5'983'515 UAH4'200'000 UAH
For preparation368'107 UAH200'000 UAH
For implementation5'615'408 UAH4'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost4'026'927 UAH5'000'000 UAH
For operation4'026'927 UAH5'000'000 UAH
For closing0 UAH0 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Average project cost per service recipient

Service UnitКількість отримувачів послуг
Service Unit Cost150 UAH

Profitability of the project

Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo

Availability of services

Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Financing Mechanisms

Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

Source and MechanismYesNo

Funding Sources

Approved Funds240'361 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds240'361 UAH0 UAH

Public-private partnership

Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Management Rationale

Team competencies

Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - economic analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - communication with stakeholders

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - risk management

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - social and gender analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - public consultations

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of available procurement options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - legal support

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial analysis - financial analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - demand analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - environmental expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of the market environment

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Partially, we have limited experience

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Risk assessment

Technical riskDefinedUndefined
Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Political riskDefinedUndefined

Team involvement

How exactly are/will stakeholders be involved?
Meetings with local authorities

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Public hearings

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

When are/will engagement activities be taking place?
At the project monitoring stage

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

At the project implementation stage

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

At the project preparation stage

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

How is/will the public be informed about the importance of participation and available channels for feedback?
Official websites

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

https://kremen.gov.ua/index.php?view=single-news&news-id=40879
Local media

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Are public hearings being held/will they be held (offline, online)?
Yes, offline.

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

https://kremen.gov.ua/index.php?view=single-news&news-id=40879
Who will attend the public hearings?
Representatives of public organizations

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Experts

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Community representatives

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Government officials

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Public hearings have already been held
Yes

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

12 грудня 2025 року, у виконавчому комітеті Кременчуцької міської ради відбулися Громадські слухання щодо врахування громадських інтересів проєкту рішення Кременчуцької міської ради Кременчуцького району Полтавської області «Про бюджет Кременчуцької міської територіальної громади на 2026 рік». Участь у слуханнях взяли 169 громадян.
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
09/04/2026SP-L-090426-22F50674Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--