Reconstruction of the building of the primary classes of the Nemovych Secondary School of the 1st-3rd grades at 2 Tsentralna Street in the village of Nemovych, Sarny district, Rivne region
Sector
Education and science
Stream
Construction and modernization of educational institutions, improvement of their infrastructure, ensuring the quality, safety and accessibility of education
Maturity level
83
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
The goal of the project is to create a modern educational complex in the community of five villages, combining a kindergarten and a primary school, ensuring high-quality education and comprehensive development of children of preschool and primary school age.
Key project results:
-Completion and complete reconstruction of the existing building with appropriate equipment.
-Creation of a comfortable, safe and inclusive educational space.
-Ensuring access to preschool education for children.
-Increasing the level of socialization of children and supporting families in combining work with upbringing.
-Strengthening the socio-economic development of the community through improving the educational infrastructure.
The purpose of the project
Main Goal:
Improving the quality of services
Secondary Goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Ensuring inclusiveness and equal opportunities, Introducing innovations and energy-efficient solutions, Reducing territorial or social gaps, Meeting demand
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
The goal of the project is to create a modern and safe educational space that combines kindergarten and primary school, for high-quality education and development of children in the community. Special attention in wartime conditions is paid to ensuring that students receive educational services in a face-to-face format in compliance with security requirements. To this end, the building will be completed, the equipment of educational premises will be equipped in accordance with state standards, as well as the arrangement of the simplest shelter. The project also involves the use of energy-efficient, safe and inclusive technologies with the involvement of qualified teachers.
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
The main problems are the insufficient level of educational infrastructure and the technical incompleteness of the existing building. The danger lies in the further social alienation of children, the reduction of their development and the difficulties of families in combining work with raising children. The implementation of the project will ensure the availability of quality education for preschoolers and younger schoolchildren, improve the working conditions of parents, increase the educational level of community residents and create conditions for its socio-economic development.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Number of employees of the institution/institution/organization
50 human
Population in the geographical area of influence of the project
12250 human
Other social
540 units
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Education and science
Subsector
School education
Stream
Construction and modernization of educational institutions, improvement of their infrastructure, ensuring the quality, safety and accessibility of education
Strategic document
State Strategy for Regional Development for 2021–2027
Task
2.1 Improving the material and technical base of educational institutions, ensuring the quality of educational services, particularly in rural areas
Project objectives
Project objectives were not specified by the initiator
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Demand for the service and its dynamics
What methodology was used to estimate demand?
Методологія оцінки попиту на дошкільну освіту зазвичай включає комплексний підхід, що поєднує якісні та кількісні методи. У рамках такої оцінки проводять опитування цільових груп — батьків, педагогів, адміністрації освіти та експертів регіонального рівня. Застосовують аналіз демографічних даних щодо кількості дітей дошкільного віку, соціально-економічних факторів і рівня існуючої освітньої інфраструктури.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
540 human
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?
Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?
Focus groups or consultations with women and vulnerable groups were held
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
No consultations were held with target groups.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Women's participation is ensured at various stages of planning (including public hearings)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?
All possible positive impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
A plan to mitigate negative social impacts focused on women has been developed
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The percentage of women who will gain new educational/professional opportunities is quantified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
All possible negative impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?
A policy/code of conduct on non-discrimination and gender equality has been developed
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Not provided for by the project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
Reconstruction of the primary school building and preschool educational institution of Nemovytsky Lyceum, Sarny district, Rivne region
Technical Solution 2
Construction of a separate primary school and kindergarten in the village of Nemovichi
Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)94'429'514 UAH158'500'000 UAH
For preparation2'000'000 UAH1'500'000 UAH
For implementation92'429'514 UAH157'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost1'300'000 UAH14'500'000 UAH
For operation1'000'000 UAH13'000'000 UAH
For closing300'000 UAH1'500'000 UAH
Average annual costs1'500'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.20 months36 months
Deadline for developing a FFS2 months12 months
Implementation period18 months24 months
Service life600 months600 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
Для реалізації цього проекту була обрана стратегія відкритих конкурентних торгів, і тендер було проведено у 2019 році через систему ProZorro. Така стратегія закупівель виправдана масштабом і соціальним значенням проєкту, оскільки дозволяє залучити максимально широке коло кваліфікованих підрядників, забезпечити прозорість процедури, конкурентне ціноутворення та якість виконання робіт. Відкритий публічний тендер мінімізує корупційні ризики та гарантує відповідність усім вимогам законодавства України до публічних закупівель
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
Для забезпечення прозорості, конкуренції та ефективності застосовувалась електронна система ProZorro, публічне висвітлення документації і результатів, незалежний моніторинг, відкритість для громадськості та можливість оскарження. Такі підходи забезпечили ефективний вибір виконавця та дотримання визначених бюджетних і технічних вимог проекту
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
Open competitive bidding
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pre-market engagement
Перед оголошенням тендеру було організовано детальний аналіз ринку: проведено огляд відкритих закупівель у суміжних проєктах, вивчено цінові пропозиції, проведено консультації з експертами в галузі будівництва освітніх об’єктів. Здійснено укрупнення і перевірку потенційних постачальників та підрядників, що дозволило коректно визначити обсяг конкуренції і сформувати технічне завдання та бюджет проекту відповідно до фактичної ринкової ситуації
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Potential market participants
У процесі підготовки до закупівлі було проаналізовано рівень конкуренції серед компаній, які можуть виступати постачальниками та підрядниками. Прогнозовано, що національні та місцеві будівельні компанії з досвідом виконання схожих робіт візьмуть участь у тендері, оскільки на ринку є широкий вибір кваліфікованих виконавців. Відкритий тендер у системі ProZorro дозволив залучити найкращі пропозиції та забезпечити високий рівень конкуренції.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Market readiness assessment
Ринок будівельних робіт в Україні готовий до реалізації проєкту такого масштабу завдяки наявності достатньої кількості кваліфікованих підрядників, широкої доступності сучасних технологій і матеріалів. Протягом підготовчого періоду не було виявлено регуляторних чи технічних бар'єрів — всі компанії, які подалися на тендер, відповідали встановленим вимогам і мали досвід роботи з аналогічними інфраструктурними об'єктами. Це гарантує якість і конкурентне виконання робіт за оптимальною ціною.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget95'729'514 UAH173'000'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)94'429'514 UAH158'500'000 UAH
For preparation2'000'000 UAH1'500'000 UAH
For implementation92'429'514 UAH157'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost1'300'000 UAH14'500'000 UAH
For operation1'000'000 UAH13'000'000 UAH
For closing300'000 UAH1'500'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service UnitЗдобувач освіти
Service Unit Cost170'869 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Is the project self-sustaining?No
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds37'914'538 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds37'914'538 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management Rationale
Team competencies
Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - economic analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - communication with stakeholders
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - risk management
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - social and gender analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - public consultations
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic feasibility study - technical expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of available procurement options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - legal support
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial analysis - financial analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - demand analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - environmental expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of the market environment
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Partially, we have limited experience
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
Economic feasibility study - technical expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - environmental expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of available procurement options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - economic analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial analysis - financial analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management rationale - risk management
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management rationale - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management justification - legal support
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
Technical experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Risk assessment
Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Need for financing
Does the project require additional funding for preparation?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
20/10/2025SP-L-201025-BCDA88DFCommunity SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
24/11/2025SPP-L-241125-7E09E80DCommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-83