Major repairs of intra-district passages on Beregivska Street, 28, 28A, 28B, 28B, 30 in Mukachevo


Sector
Transport Sector
Stream
Development of public road infrastructure
Maturity level
64
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

Improving the condition of intra-district roads and ensuring safe and convenient movement of residents.

The purpose of the project

Main Goal:

Improving the condition of infrastructure

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

Improving the condition of intra-district roads and ensuring safe and convenient movement of residents.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

Restoration of the road surface, which will ensure safe traffic, convenience for pedestrians, and increase the comfort of residents.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Other functional

3455 m2

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Transport Sector

Subsector

Road transport and road infrastructure

Stream

Development of public road infrastructure

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

2.1.1. Creating accessible road infrastructure and property (construction/repair of roads, bridges and sidewalks oriented towards the needs of people with disabilities)

Project objectives

Project objectives were not specified by the initiator

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Register of documents of the UEDESSB Beregovska.pdf
26.02.2026
12:46:07 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Overhaul

Technical Solution 2

Lack of repair

Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)9'058'742 UAH2 UAH
For preparation1'954'401 UAH1 UAH
For implementation7'104'341 UAH1 UAH
Project operation and closure cost2 UAH2 UAH
For operation1 UAH1 UAH
For closing1 UAH1 UAH
Average annual costs1 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.14 months13 months
Deadline for developing a FFS2 months1 month
Implementation period12 months12 months
Service life120 months24 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active

[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Rejected

[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Components of a technical solution
To components
0
To components
0

Commercial Justification

Supplier and contractor market assessment

Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, both national and international

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial justification

Total project budget

Total preliminary budget9'058'744 UAH4 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)9'058'742 UAH2 UAH
For preparation1'954'401 UAH1 UAH
For implementation7'104'341 UAH1 UAH
Project operation and closure cost2 UAH2 UAH
For operation1 UAH1 UAH
For closing1 UAH1 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Average project cost per service recipient

Service UnitМетр квадратний
Service Unit Cost2'621 UAH

Profitability of the project

Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo

Availability of services

Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Financing Mechanisms

Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

Source and MechanismYesNo

Funding Sources

Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH

Public-private partnership

Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Management Rationale

Team competencies

Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Risk assessment

Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

None of the options are applicable

Project Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
26/02/2026SP-L-260226-40AE41A1Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
23/03/2026SPP-L-230326-C03B5407Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-64