Providing high-quality, modern and accessible general secondary education "New Ukrainian School"


Sector
Education and science
Stream
Modernization of educational equipment in educational institutions
Maturity level
79
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project is aimed at modernizing the educational environment of the Rohatyn State Technical and Vocational School in accordance with the principles of the National State Educational Service through the renovation of classrooms - chemistry, mathematics and geography. It is planned to combine classic, time-tested visual and laboratory tools with basic digital tools, which will increase the safety, clarity and practical component of learning for all middle and high school students.

 

The purpose of the project

Main Goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards

Secondary Goal:

Improving the condition of infrastructure, Ensuring inclusiveness and equal opportunities, Improving the quality of services

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

To create a safe, functional and methodically equipped educational environment in accordance with the principles of the New Ukrainian School, by modernizing chemistry, mathematics and geography classrooms. The project is aimed at bringing the material and technical base into line with modern requirements and current lists of the Ministry of Education and Science, strengthening practice-oriented and competency-based learning, ensuring inclusiveness and improving the quality of educational services for students of basic and high schools.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

Problems (current status and consequences): - Inconsistent material and technical base with modern standards of the National University of Science and Technology. Worn-out furniture and outdated equipment reduce the ergonomics of workplaces and the quality of education. - Insufficient multimedia support. Old/absent projectors and poor visualization limit the use of digital resources and modern teaching methods. Chemistry room - Worn-out laboratory tables and sinks, lack of water points, electrical wiring without separate protection. Increased risks for students and teachers, inability to safely perform the full list of laboratory work. - Incomplete sets of dishes, reagents and outdated demonstration devices. Reduction of the practical component of the course, formal nature of experiments. Mathematics room - Only a chalk board without markings, limited sets of models. Complicated explanations of spatial topics, poor clarity. ‑ Lack of modern software for dynamic geometry. No modeling and research tasks, student motivation decreases. Geography classroom ‑ Outdated maps/atlases, not enough globes and relief models. Inaccurate/outdated information and poor visualization of educational material. ‑ No weather station, compasses/field kits, collections of rocks and minerals. Lack of practice of observations, measurements and field work. ‑ Outdated projector, low quality of material reproduction. It is impossible to effectively use electronic maps, satellite images, videos. Results: 3 modernized classrooms: chemistry, mathematics, geography. ‑ Chemistry: fume hood installed; chemical-resistant tables and cabinets; safe-cabinet with ventilation for reagents; equipped with basic reagents and dishes; eyewash station/first aid kit/fire extinguisher; updated sinks and water supply; multimedia kit. ‑ Mathematics: ceramic board with markings; sets of planar and spatial models; measuring kits; document camera; software for dynamic geometry; ‑ multimedia kit. ‑ Geography: up-to-date maps and atlases; globes and relief models; collections of rocks and minerals; school weather station, compasses/field kits; multimedia kit. ‑ inclusive place in each classroom; updated safety instructions. ‑ Capacity building: short methodological trainings for teachers (at least 9 academic hours).

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of employees of the institution/institution/organization

10 human

Number of people who will use the service

200 human

Other functional

3 units

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Education and science

Subsector

School education

Stream

Modernization of educational equipment in educational institutions

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

B.3.2.5 Modernization of educational equipment in educational institutions.

Project objectives

Project objectives were not specified by the initiator

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

1. Аналіз кількості учнів. 2. Розрахунок навчального навантаження й завантаження кабінетів 3. Інвентаризація МТБ 4. Опитування вчителів
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
200 human
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
2
230 human
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
3
250 human
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

None of the options are applicable

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Economic analysis.docx
24.10.2025
12:04:01 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Providing high-quality, modern and accessible general secondary education "New Ukrainian School"

Technical Solution 2

Maintaining the current functioning of the ZZSO

Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)1'377'660 UAH170'000 UAH
For implementation1'377'660 UAH170'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost0 UAH0 UAH
Average annual costs25'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.4 months4 months
Deadline for developing a FFS1 month1 month
Implementation period3 months3 months
Service life60 months12 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active

[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Rejected

[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Components of a technical solution
To components
0
To components
0

Commercial Justification

Supplier and contractor market assessment

Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, both national and international

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial justification

Total project budget

Total preliminary budget1'377'660 UAH170'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)1'377'660 UAH170'000 UAH
For preparation0 UAH0 UAH
For implementation1'377'660 UAH170'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost0 UAH0 UAH
For operation0 UAH0 UAH
For closing0 UAH0 UAH
Чи була під час уточнення орієнтовного бюджету використана Методика розрахунку вартості публічного інвестиційного проєкту, затверджена наказом Міністерства фінансів України №316 від 23.06.2025 р.?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Чи була під час розрахунку орієнтовного бюджету використана Методика розрахунку вартості публічного інвестиційного проєкту, затверджена наказом Міністерства фінансів України №316 від 23.06.2025 р.?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Average project cost per service recipient

Service Unit1 учень (5–11 класи, користувачі кабінетів)
Service Unit Cost5'511 UAH

Profitability of the project

Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo

Availability of services

Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Financing Mechanisms

Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

Source and MechanismYesNo

Funding Sources

Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH

Public-private partnership

Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Management Rationale

Team competencies

Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - economic analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - communication with stakeholders

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - risk management

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - social and gender analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - public consultations

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of available procurement options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - legal support

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial analysis - financial analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - demand analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - environmental expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of the market environment

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
No, I need help.

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Risk assessment

Technical riskDefinedUndefined
Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Economic riskDefinedUndefined
Market riskDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

None of the options are applicable

Project Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
27/10/2025SP-L-271025-62A53D97Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
04/11/2025SPP-L-041125-2A725FE5Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-79