Reconstruction of building No. 3 of Kostopil Lyceum No. 1 named after T.G. Shevchenko for a dining room, a PRU and an assembly hall.
Sector
Education and science
Stream
Ensuring access to high-quality and safe food in educational institutions through the development of modern canteen infrastructure (food blocks)
Maturity level
75
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
Kostopil Lyceum No. 1 named after T.G. Shevchenko of the Kostopil City Council operates in a mixed form of education due to the lack of anti-radiation shelter. The institution uses shelters located within a radius of 500 meters from the institution, which we rent under a contract, which is extremely difficult for students. The shelters that we rent do not meet the needs of the institution, so we need to have a shelter that will ensure full-fledged education for students and save the lives of students and teachers. The second big problem is the lack of a canteen in the lyceum, which has 700 children. The lyceum cannot qualitatively implement the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated March 24, 2021 No. 305 "On Approval of the Norms and Procedure for Organizing Catering in Educational Institutions and Children's Health and Recreation Institutions". The project envisages the reconstruction of building No. 3, which is not used due to its condition, as a PRU, a dining room and an assembly hall, which will ensure the provision of high-quality educational services, the organization of full-fledged meals for students, and the creation of safe conditions for participants in the educational process.
The purpose of the project
Main Goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards
Secondary Goal:
Ensuring inclusiveness and equal opportunities, Introducing innovations and energy-efficient solutions, Improving the quality of services
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
The purpose of this project is the reconstruction of building No. 3 for a 2-story building of an assembly hall, a dining room and a radiation shelter. If the project is implemented, the lyceum will be able to resume full-time education and provide full-fledged nutrition for students. The reconstruction of building No. 3 will solve two priority areas: the opportunity to study full-time and provide full-fledged nutrition for children.
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
The current problem of the institution is the complete lack of shelter and a dining room. If the project is implemented, 700 students will be able to eat in stable, sanitary and hygienic conditions, and if there is shelter, students will be in safe conditions, which will save their lives.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Capital expenditure per year
57 mln UAH
Operating expenses per year
1.5 mln UAH
Maintenance costs per year
300 thous. UAH
Number of IDP users
20 human
Number of jobs, including for IDPs
2 human
Number of people who will use the service
700 human
Number of employees of the institution/institution/organization
70 human
Number of users from low-mobility population groups
1 human
Capacity
520 human
Number of IDPs in the geographical area of impact of the project
100 human
Population in the geographical area of influence of the project
3300 human
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Education and science
Subsector
School education
Stream
Ensuring access to high-quality and safe food in educational institutions through the development of modern canteen infrastructure (food blocks)
Strategic document
Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади
Task
3.1.1. Ensuring equal access to quality preschool, general secondary and extracurricular education.
Project objectives
Indicator
Base value
Target value
Number of students currently eating only through catering services
350 human
700 human
Assembly hall
0 human
300 human
Shelter for 300 students
0 human
300 human
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Demand for the service and its dynamics
What methodology was used to estimate demand?
? 1. Нормативний метод Використовуються державні будівельні норми (ДБН), зокрема: ДБН В.2.2-3:2018 "Будинки і споруди. Заклади освіти" Санітарний регламент для закладів загальної середньої освіти ДСанПіН 5.5.2.008-01 або інші актуальні санітарні норми. ? Основна ідея: розрахунок потреби у площі їдальні, кількості місць та змінності роботи їдальні на основі кількості учнів (661 учень). ? 2. Функціонально-просторовий аналіз Оцінюється, які функції має виконувати їдальня: Скільки дітей можуть харчуватись одночасно (залежить від змінності навчання) Час, відведений на харчування Необхідність спеціальних приміщень (кухня, мийна, комора тощо) Наявність або відсутність централізованого постачання їжі (готують на місці чи привозять) ? 3. Демографічний аналіз Береться до уваги: Поточна кількість учнів Прогноз зростання чи зменшення контингенту Кількість змін у закладі Вікові групи дітей (початкова, середня, старша школа) ? 4. Соціально-економічне обґрунтування Аналізуються: Наявність альтернатив (їдальні поруч, буфети) Соціальні наслідки (здоров’я учнів, рівень забезпечення харчуванням) Потреба в організованому гарячому харчуванні (особливо для пільгових категорій) ? 5. Оцінка пропускної спроможності Враховується: Кількість учнів, яких потрібно обслужити за одну зміну Середній час на обід (зазвичай 20–30 хвилин) Кількість посадкових місць → кількість циклів обслуговування → площа приміщень ? Наприклад: Якщо в їдальні 100 місць і кожна група обідає 30 хвилин, то за 2 години можна обслужити 4 групи по 100 учнів = 400 учнів. Для 661 учня потрібна більша місткість або поділ на зміни. ? 6. Аналіз наявної інфраструктури Чи існує стара їдальня? Який її стан? Чи можливо її реконструювати? Які комунікації (вода, каналізація, електрика) є наявними? ? Висновки оформлюються у вигляді: Розрахунків пропускної спроможності Потреби у площі (м²) Кількості необхідного персоналу Кошторису будівництва / реконструкції Оцінки соціального ефекту
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
661 human
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
2
756 human
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?
Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
None of the options are applicable
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
Other benefits from project implementation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?
None of the options are applicable
Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?
All possible positive impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
All possible negative impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?
A policy/code of conduct on non-discrimination and gender equality has been developed
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
A gender specialist/advisor is included in the project management structure
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Mandatory training for project staff on gender equality and inclusion is provided
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Not provided for by the project
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
Comprehensive modernization of building No. 3 for a dining room
Technical Solution 2
Construction of the dining hall building of Kostopil Lyceum No. 1 named after T.G.Shevchenko
Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)54'045'000 UAH120'300'000 UAH
For preparation245'000 UAH300'000 UAH
For implementation53'800'000 UAH120'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost3'040'000 UAH2'000'000 UAH
For operation2'500'000 UAH1'500'000 UAH
For closing540'000 UAH500'000 UAH
Average annual costs1'500'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.44 months48 months
Deadline for developing a FFS8 months12 months
Implementation period36 months36 months
Service life360 months360 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, both national and international
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
Етапна стратегія (покрокова реалізація)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
Проведення закупівель через систему Prozorro (для України)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
Open competitive bidding
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pre-market engagement
Огляд відкритих тендерів, консультації з експертами
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Potential market participants
ТОВ "Будремсервіс" ТОВ "Комунальник+" ПП "Майстер-Буд" ФОП з досвідом у капітальному ремонті соціальних об’єктів
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Market readiness assessment
Ринок продемонстрував достатній рівень готовності до виконання робіт у сфері реконструкції об’єктів соціальної інфраструктури.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget57'085'000 UAH122'300'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)54'045'000 UAH120'300'000 UAH
For preparation245'000 UAH300'000 UAH
For implementation53'800'000 UAH120'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost3'040'000 UAH2'000'000 UAH
For operation2'500'000 UAH1'500'000 UAH
For closing540'000 UAH500'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service UnitВартість одиниці послуги
Service Unit Cost76'857 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Is the project self-sustaining?No
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management Rationale
Team competencies
Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
None of the options are applicable
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
No, this is the first project of its kind.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
Specialists in interaction with international financial organizations (IFOs)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial consultants/modelers
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Legal consultants
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Commercial experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic analysts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Technical experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management experts / project managers
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Risk assessment
Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Organizational events
ResponseDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?
Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of the feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of the feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Need for financing
Does the project require additional funding for preparation?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
08/10/2025SP-L-081025-949DF0DECommunity SPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludethe project meets the objectives of the public investment direction-
13/02/2026SP-N-130226-DA3F585FState SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
18/11/2025SPP-L-181125-9FC085C8Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeIncluded in the community's EPP for 2026 (project with PCD)75