New construction of artesian wells on the territory of the Lozova urban territorial community of the Kharkiv region, namely: the city of Lozova, Stepova Street - 2 units, the village of Krasnopavlivka - 2 units, the village of Lymanivka - 1 unit, the village of Yakovlivka - 1 unit, the village of Domakha - 1 unit, the village of Katerynivka - 1 unit with the arrangement of water treatment stations and branching of networks connecting to centralized water supply systems
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Restoration, development and modernization of centralized water supply and wastewater infrastructure, including the introduction of alternative energy sources
Maturity level
82
Project Status
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Investment Feasibility Study
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
The project envisages providing the community with an alternative backup source of water supply by drilling 8 deep wells. Instead of repairing kilometers of old pipes, local water supply nodes will be built around new wells, which is much cheaper to maintain. The expected result is autonomous access to clean water and independence from centralized networks.
The purpose of the project
Main Goal:
Creation of new facilities and services
Secondary Goal:
Improving the equality of wealth distribution, Improving the quality of services
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
The goal of the project is to provide high-quality drinking water to the residents of the Lozov urban territorial community. During the project implementation, it is planned to drill 8 deep wells in the settlements of the community.
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Number of people who will use the service
75630 human
Capacity
8350 m3
Population in the geographical area of influence of the project
77722 human
Number of IDPs in the geographical area of impact of the project
13567 human
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Subsector
Water supply and sanitation
Stream
Restoration, development and modernization of centralized water supply and wastewater infrastructure, including the introduction of alternative energy sources
Strategic document
Регіональна стратегія розвитку
Task
2.2.3. Increasing the availability of high-quality water supply by implementing measures to reconstruct water supply, drainage and treatment systems, reduce discharges and eliminate sources of pollution.
Project objectives
Indicator
Base value
Target value
Number of alternative backup water supply sources
0 units
8 units
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Demand for the service and its dynamics
What methodology was used to estimate demand?
Проводився аналіз інфраструктури та соціально-економічних чинників.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
2722680 m3
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Protecting and restoring biodiversity and ecosystems
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
New construction of artesian wells on the territory of the Lozova urban territorial community of the Kharkiv region, namely: the city of Lozova, Stepova Street - 2 units, the village of Krasnopavlivka - 2 units, the village of Lymanivka - 1 unit, the village of Yakovlivka - 1 unit, the village of Domakha - 1 unit, the village of Katerynivka - 1 unit with the arrangement of water treatment stations and branching of networks connecting to centralized water supply systems
Technical Solution 2
Modernization of existing mine wells (Public wells)
Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)240'000'000 UAH750'000 UAH
For preparation6'000'000 UAH100'000 UAH
For implementation234'000'000 UAH650'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost60'000'001 UAH500'001 UAH
For operation60'000'000 UAH500'000 UAH
For closing1 UAH1 UAH
Average annual costs2'000'000 UAH50'000 UAH
Project duration, incl.9 months3 months
Deadline for developing a FFS3 months1 month
Implementation period6 months2 months
Service life360 months120 months
Target indicatorsDefined Not defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Pending
[The project initiator has not taken any decision about this alternative technical approach.]
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, both national and international
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget300'000'001 UAH1'250'001 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)240'000'000 UAH750'000 UAH
For preparation6'000'000 UAH100'000 UAH
For implementation234'000'000 UAH650'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost60'000'001 UAH500'001 UAH
For operation60'000'000 UAH500'000 UAH
For closing1 UAH1 UAH
Чи була під час розрахунку орієнтовного бюджету використана Методика розрахунку вартості публічного інвестиційного проєкту, затверджена наказом Міністерства фінансів України №316 від 23.06.2025 р.?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service UnitКількість споживачів
Service Unit Cost3'173 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Is the project self-sustaining?No
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
No – analysis not performed
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management Rationale
Team competencies
Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic rationale - demand analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial analysis - financial analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - social and gender analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - economic analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - risk management
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - communication with stakeholders
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of available procurement options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - public consultations
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of the market environment
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - legal support
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
No, this is the first project of its kind.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
Economic justification - environmental expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic feasibility study - technical expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Risk assessment
Technical riskDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Need for financing
Does the project require additional funding for preparation?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
06/05/2026SP-L-060526-8A170E92Community SPPreliminary Investment Feasibility StudyIncludeCorresponds to the medium-term plan of priority public investments of the Lozov city territorial community for 2026–2028, approved by the decision of the executive committee of the Lozov city council of the Kharkiv region dated August 26, 2025 No. 1213, as the main direction of public investment.-
27/05/2026SPP-L-270526-404F6694Community SPPPreliminary Investment Feasibility StudyIncludeCorresponds to the medium-term plan of priority public investments of the Lozov city territorial community for 2026–2028, approved by the decision of the executive committee of the Lozov city council of the Kharkiv region dated August 26, 2025 No. 1213, as the main direction of public investment.82