Reconstruction of the administrative premises for the Administrative Services Center "Center Diya" at the address: Ternopil region, Ternopil district, Kozova village, Hrushevskoho street, 13a


Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Building and restoring the infrastructure of subnational governments
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project involves a comprehensive reconstruction of the existing building in order to create a modern Administrative Services Center "Center Diya". The implementation of the project is aimed at improving the quality, accessibility and transparency of administrative services provided to community residents. 

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Improving the quality of services

Secondary goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards, Improving the equality of wealth distribution, Ensuring inclusiveness and equal opportunities, Meeting demand

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The goal of the project is to create a modern, accessible and customer-oriented Administrative Services Center "Center Diya" by reconstructing the administrative premises of the Koziv Village Council to ensure high-quality, transparent, fast and convenient provision of administrative services to community residents in accordance with state standards and principles of good governance. The specified goal is planned to be achieved by: conducting a comprehensive reconstruction of the building with redevelopment of the premises in accordance with the functional model of the ASC (front office, back office, waiting area, reception); modernizing engineering networks and implementing energy-efficient solutions to reduce operating costs; ensuring full barrier-free and accessibility for people with disabilities and other low-mobility groups; equipping the Center with modern furniture, equipment and software and hardware, including an electronic queue and information systems; implementing digital services and integration with state electronic registers to reduce the time for providing services; increasing organizational efficiency of staff through optimization of internal service processes.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

The urgency of the problem is due to the growing needs of the community for high-quality and affordable services. If these issues are not resolved, community residents will continue to face queues, limited access to services, and uncomfortable conditions, which reduces the efficiency of the administrative system and trust in government authorities. The implementation of the project will ensure the creation of a modern specialized ASC facility, which will allow expanding the list of administrative services, increasing the level of comfort for visitors and employees, implementing inclusive and technological solutions, and ensuring effective interaction between government authorities and citizens. As a result, it is expected to improve the quality and accessibility of administrative services and develop the institutional capacity of the community.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of employees of the institution/institution/organization

15 human

Capacity

11 human

Number of people who will use the service

21500 human

Number of IDP users

1000 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Municipal infrastructure and services

Subsector

Development and Reconstruction of Subnational Infrastructure

Stream

Building and restoring the infrastructure of subnational governments

Strategic document

State Strategy for Regional Development for 2021–2027

Task

50 Promoting the development of a network of administrative service centers and ensuring high-quality service provision to applicants.

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
Number of residents who will receive administrative services in the new ASC
0 human
21500 human

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Аналітично-розрахункова методологія: для оцінки попиту застосовувався аналіз фактичної кількості звернень громадян до діючого ЦНАПу, що функціонує в приміщенні з обмеженою площею, а також моніторинг динаміки населення громади та внутрішньо переміщених осіб, які користуються адміністративними послугами. Додатково враховано статистичні дані про кількість наданих послуг за останні роки та прогноз зростання звернень після розширення переліку послуг і створення комфортних умов обслуговування.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
12000 human
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

None of the options are applicable

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Other benefits from project implementation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
ASC (1).odt
23.02.2026
19:34:04 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Reconstruction of the administrative premises for the Administrative Services Center "Center Diya" at the address: Ternopil region, Ternopil district, Kozova village, Hrushevskoho street, 13a

Technical Solution 2

New construction of TsNP

Total costs27'100'000 UAH30'000'000 UAH
  • For preparation
  • 700'000 UAH600'000 UAH
  • For implementation
  • 26'000'000 UAH29'000'000 UAH
  • For operation
  • 300'000 UAH300'000 UAH
  • For closing
  • 100'000 UAH100'000 UAH
    Average annual costs300'000 UAH300'000 UAH
    Project duration, incl.21 months48 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
  • 6 months12 months
  • Implementation period
  • 15 months36 months
    Service life360 months360 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active

    [The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Rejected

    [The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Components of a technical solution
    To components
    0
    To components
    0

    Commercial Justification

    Supplier and contractor market assessment

    Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
    Yes, only national

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget27'100'000 UAH30'000'000 UAH
    Capital costs27'100'000 UAH30'000'000 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation700'000 UAH600'000 UAH
    For implementation26'000'000 UAH29'000'000 UAH
    For operation300'000 UAH300'000 UAH
    For closing100'000 UAH100'000 UAH
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service UnitСередня вартість проєкту на одного отримувача послуги
    Service Unit Cost1'260 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?

    ResponseNoNo

    Availability of services

    Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
    Yes – the analysis was conducted, it was found that the tariffs correspond to the financial capabilities of consumers

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Funding Sources

    Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
    Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH

    Public-private partnership

    Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
    The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

    Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

    None of the options are applicable

    Project Approval History

    DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasons
    23/02/2026SP-L-230226-8A351398Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeInclude in sector portfolio
    25/02/2026SPP-L-250226-F356BC9FCommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-