Restoration of the Mykolaiv Lyceum No. 51 of the Mykolaiv City Council of the Mykolaiv region at the address: Mykolaiv, Parusny Lane, 3-a in the city of Mykolaiv

Sector
Education and science
Stream
Modernization, reconstruction and renewal of the material and technical base of the infrastructure of educational institutions
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The project involves the restoration of  Lyceum No. 51, which suffered significant damage during shelling.  The goal is to provide safe, modern and energy-efficient learning conditions, in compliance with all current building codes, energy efficiency, fire and technogenic safety, sanitary and anti-epidemic requirements.

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Rebuilding the damaged/destroyed

Secondary goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards, Increasing compliance with modern standards, Improving the equality of wealth distribution, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Ensuring inclusiveness and equal opportunities, Improving the quality of services, Meeting demand

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The goal is to create a modern educational hub for the community of the central microdistrict of the city of Mykolaiv, which will become a center for innovative learning, social interaction, and development of children and youth.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

Mykolaiv Lyceum No. 51, located in the central microdistrict of the city of Mykolaiv, suffered significant damage as a result of the armed aggression of the Russian Federation. As a result of the shelling, the roof, window and door blocks, internal partitions, engineering communications were partially destroyed, and some structural elements of the building lost their load-bearing capacity. Currently, the educational institution cannot perform its functions due to the emergency condition of the premises, the lack of safe conditions for students and teaching staff, as well as the building's non-compliance with current construction, fire and sanitary standards. Thus, failure to restore Lyceum No. 51 in a short time creates a threat of further deterioration of the building, loss of the educational potential of the district and violation of children's right to access to high-quality and safe education.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of people who will use the service

1200 human

Number of IDP users

200 human

Number of users from low-mobility population groups

30 human

Population in the geographical area of influence of the project

3600 human

Number of IDPs in the geographical area of impact of the project

600 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Education and science

Subsector

School education

Stream

Modernization, reconstruction and renewal of the material and technical base of the infrastructure of educational institutions

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

2.5.2 A modern educational space is the key to successful learning and development of students

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
Number of secondary education institutions restored after destruction due to armed aggression of the Russian Federation
0 units
1 units

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

При оцінці попиту за проєктом застосовували соціально-демографічну та нормативно-обумовлену методологію, за якої потреба визначається кількістю дітей шкільного віку в мікрорайоні, контингентом учнів закладу та вимогами державних стандартів щодо забезпечення доступу до освіти. Додатково використовується ризик- та відновлювально-орієнтований підхід, який враховує наслідки збройної агресії, міграційні процеси та необхідність відновлення безпечної освітньої інфраструктури для сталого функціонування громади.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
900 human
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
2
1000 human
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
3
1200 human
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?

No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?

Yes, not yet conducted
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?

Feedback on the project design was received from organizations working with women
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?

All possible positive impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
All possible negative impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?

A policy/code of conduct on non-discrimination and gender equality has been developed
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Economic analysis lyceum 51.pdf
24.12.2025
12:30:39 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Reconstruction of the Mykolaiv Lyceum No. 51 of the Mykolaiv City Council of the Mykolaiv region at the address: Mykolaiv, Parusnyi Lane, 3A in the city of Mykolaiv.

Technical Solution 2

New construction of the Mykolaiv Lyceum No. 51 of the Mykolaiv City Council of the Mykolaiv region at the address: Mykolaiv, Parusnyi Lane, 3-a in the city of Mykolaiv

Total costs501'224'181 UAH3'495'293'992 UAH
  • For preparation
    • 2'161'600 UAH673'168'260 UAH
  • For implementation
    • 345'698'080 UAH1'390'582'431 UAH
  • For operation
    • 153'364'500 UAH1'431'543'300 UAH
  • For closing
    • 1 UAH1 UAH
    Average annual costs1'533'645 UAH14'315'433 UAH
    Project duration, incl.26 months32 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
    • 6 months8 months
  • Implementation period
    • 20 months24 months
    Service life1200 months1200 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active

    [The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

    Unsuccessful

    [The technical approach was analyzed and considered for implementation but was not selected as the final option.]

    Components of a technical solution
    To components
    1
    To components
    1

    Commercial Justification

    Supplier and contractor market assessment

    Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
    Yes, both national and international

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Yes, both national and international

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
    Обрана стратегія закупівель для реалізації проєкту - відкриті торги

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Обрана стратегія закупівель для реалізації проєкту - відкриті торги

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
    Відкритість процедур та контроль якості закупівель буде забезпечено наступними інструментами: ProZorro, незалежний нагляд, публічне звітування

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Відкритість процедур та контроль якості закупівель буде забезпечено наступними інструментами: ProZorro, незалежний нагляд, публічне звітування

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
    Open competitive bidding

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Other

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Open competitive bidding

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Other

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Pre-market engagement
    Попереднє залучення ринку здійснювалося наступним шляхом: огляд відкритих тендерів, консультації з експертами, аналіз аналогічних проєктів, прямі запити до компаній

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    для авторського та технагляду будуть укладатися прямі договори

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Potential market participants
    очікується високий рівень конкуренції оскільки проект має привабливість як для національних так і для міжнародних компаній, як для малого так і для середнього бізнесу

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    очікується високий рівень конкуренції оскільки проект має привабливість як для національних так і для міжнародних компаній, як для малого так і для середнього бізнесу

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Market readiness assessment
    Опираючись данні сайту Prozorro ринок готовий до реалізації проекту

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Опираючись данні сайту Prozorro ринок готовий до реалізації проекту

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget501'224'181 UAH3'495'293'992 UAH
    Capital costs501'224'181 UAH3'495'293'992 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation2'161'600 UAH673'168'260 UAH
    For implementation345'698'080 UAH1'390'582'431 UAH
    For operation153'364'500 UAH1'431'543'300 UAH
    For closing1 UAH1 UAH
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
    Yes
    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service UnitСередня вартість проєкту на одного отримувача послугиСередня вартість проєкту на одного отримувача послуги на рік
    Service Unit Cost1'278 UAH11'929 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
    Is the project self-sustaining?NoNo

    Availability of services

    Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
    Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesYes

    Funding Sources

    Approved Funds0 UAH3'136'642 UAH
    Expected Funds0 UAH3'136'642 UAH

    Public-private partnership

    Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
    The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    No

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management Rationale

    Team competencies

    Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
    Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - economic analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - risk management

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - social and gender analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - public consultations

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of available procurement options

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - legal support

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial analysis - financial analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - demand analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - environmental expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of the market environment

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - economic analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - risk management

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - social and gender analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - public consultations

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of available procurement options

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project management - legal support

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial analysis - financial analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic rationale - demand analysis

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic justification - environmental expertise

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Business case - analysis of the market environment

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
    Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
    Management rationale - communication with stakeholders

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management rationale - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management rationale - communication with stakeholders

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management rationale - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
    Partially, we are considering options

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Partially, we are considering options

    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
    Environmental experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial consultants/modelers

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Legal consultants

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Commercial experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic analysts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic consultants

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Technical experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management experts / project managers

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Specialists in interaction with international financial organizations (IFOs)

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Environmental experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Financial consultants/modelers

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Legal consultants

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Commercial experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Economic analysts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Strategic consultants

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Technical experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Management experts / project managers

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Yes

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Risk assessment

    Technical riskDefinedDefined
    Financial riskDefinedDefined
    Economic riskDefinedUndefined
    Political riskDefinedDefined
    Market riskUndefinedDefined

    Organizational events

    ResponseDefinedDefined

    Team involvement

    How exactly are/will stakeholders be involved?
    Focus group

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Online survey

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Meetings with local authorities

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Public consultations

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Public hearings

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Focus group

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Online survey

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Meetings with local authorities

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Public consultations

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Public hearings

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    When are/will engagement activities be taking place?
    At the project monitoring stage

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    At the project implementation stage

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    At the project preparation stage

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    At the project monitoring stage

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    At the project implementation stage

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    At the project preparation stage

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    How is/will the public be informed about the importance of participation and available channels for feedback?
    Official websites

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Social networks

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Local media

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Official websites

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Social networks

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Local media

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Are public hearings being held/will they be held (offline, online)?
    Yes, offline.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    громадські слухання обговорення проекту планується проводити як онлайн шляхом опитувань в соцмережах так і офлайн із експертами, представниками громадськості та місцевої влади
    Yes, offline.

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    громадські слухання обговорення проекту планується проводити як онлайн шляхом опитувань в соцмережіх так і офлайн із експертами, представниками громадськості та місцевої влади
    Who will attend the public hearings?
    Representatives of public organizations

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Community representatives

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Government officials

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Representatives of public organizations

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Experts

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Community representatives

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Government officials

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Public hearings have already been held
    No

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    No

    [Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

    Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?

    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?

    Development of a full feasibility study;
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
    Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of the feasibility study
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

    None of the options are applicable
    Need for financing

    Does the project require additional funding for preparation?

    No
    [Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

    Project Approval History

    DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasons
    24/12/2025SP-L-241225-1405237BCommunity SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-
    30/12/2025SPP-L-301225-5B1772A7Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-