Implementation of a distributed generation system for the purpose of uninterrupted and sustainable supply of thermal energy in the city of Zlatopil, Kharkiv region


Sector
Energy Sector
Stream
Implementation of a distributed generation system for the purpose of uninterrupted and sustainable supply of thermal energy in the city of Zlatopil, Kharkiv region
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The city of Zlatopil has a heat supply scheme consisting of 12 boiler houses, six of which serve the majority of the city's population, social infrastructure facilities and businesses. The operability of these boiler houses is of great social importance. Given the constant threat of power outages, which can lead to a shutdown of heat supply, the community purchased diesel generators at its own expense to operate the boiler houses during scheduled power outages. The next step in increasing the system's stability and energy independence is the installation of cogeneration units for its own consumption at the city's boiler houses. Thanks to long-term cooperation with Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH on the project "Strengthening the Resilience of Cities in the Sphere of Life Support of Urban Territorial Communities in Ukraine" (SUR), the community received six cogeneration units (CGUs) that will help strengthen the community's infrastructure during the heating season. In addition to receiving CHPs, it is necessary to design their installation and connection to the networks and finance the work on installing CHPs. Given the high expected cost of these works, the community is looking for opportunities to raise funds from various sources of financing. As part of the request for this project, it is planned to finance the development of design and estimate documentation and the construction of six backup sources of heat and electricity generation at the following addresses: - brand of cogeneration plant SES-HPC70 with a nominal electric capacity of 70 kW on the territory of boiler house No. 1 at the address of Zlatopil, ½ m-n, b.21G; - brand of cogeneration plant SES-HPC70 with a nominal electric capacity of 70 kW on the territory of boiler house No. 2 at the address of Zlatopil, 3 m-n, b.36A; - brand of cogeneration unit CHP unit GG 140 with a nominal electric power of 142 kW on the territory of boiler house No. 3 at the address of Zlatopil, 3rd district, building 37; - brand of cogeneration unit CHP unit GG 140 with a nominal electric power of 142 kW on the territory of boiler house No. 4 at the address of Zlatopil, 4th district, building 31; - brand of cogeneration unit SES-HPC70 with a nominal electric power of 70 kW on the territory of boiler house No. 5 at the address of Zlatopil, 6th district, building 27; - brand of cogeneration unit SES-HPC70 with a nominal electric power of 70 kW on the territory of UKTM-1 at the address of Zlatopil, ½ district, building 81. In the future, the land plot will be divided for the installation of a CHP, which is in the use of the KP "Teplomerezhy". This is a strategic project aimed at increasing energy efficiency, reducing energy costs and reducing the environmental impact on the environment. The use of cogeneration plants allows for the simultaneous production of thermal and electrical energy, which increases the overall efficiency of energy processes and reduces operating costs. 

The purpose of the project

Main goal:

Introducing innovations and energy-efficient solutions

Secondary goal:

Contribution to climate or environmental goals, Increasing compliance with modern standards, Increasing compliance with modern standards, Creation of new facilities and services, Improving the equality of wealth distribution, Increasing the even distribution of resources, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Improving the quality of services, Meeting demand

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The main goal of the project is to increase the energy sustainability, autonomy and efficiency of the heat supply system of the city of Zlatopil by installing cogeneration units (CGU) at six strategically important boiler houses to meet its own needs for heat and electricity. The project is aimed at: • reducing the dependence of the heat supply system on centralized electricity supply; • ensuring uninterrupted heat supply to the residential sector and social infrastructure facilities even in conditions of energy crises; • reducing the operating costs of the heat supply enterprise through the use of self-generated electricity; • increasing the energy efficiency and environmental sustainability of the system; • creating conditions for sustainable development of urban infrastructure. Methods of achieving the goal (implementation mechanisms) To achieve the goal, a set of measures of a technical, organizational and financial nature is envisaged, covering the entire cycle of preparation, implementation and commissioning of cogeneration units: 1. Preparatory stage • Conducting technical inspections of boiler houses to determine the locations of cogeneration units. • Development of design and estimate documentation for the installation and integration of the CHP into existing heat supply and power supply systems. • Obtaining the necessary permits, approvals and expert opinions. 2. Infrastructure stage • Carrying out construction and installation work to prepare premises and sites for equipment installation. • Installation, connection and adjustment of cogeneration units. • Integration of the CHP into the existing boiler house control system (automation, dispatching). • Carrying out commissioning work and training of personnel. 3. Organizational and economic stage • Development of a model for the operation and maintenance of the CHP (operational instructions, maintenance regulations). • Optimization of the energy balances of boiler houses, taking into account the generation of their own electricity. • Implementation of a system for monitoring the efficiency and saving of energy resources. • Popularization of the implementation experience among other communities and potential investors. Justification of the existing gap between the current state and the target level: 1) Current state. - Complete dependence of boiler houses on external power supply. In the event of a power outage - complete shutdown of work; - Outdated equipment with low efficiency, large heat losses; - High costs for electricity and fuel; limited local budget resources; - High CO₂ emissions and energy losses during transportation; - System operation is at risk in the event of a power outage. 2) Target state (after project implementation). - Boiler houses partially or fully provide themselves with electricity thanks to cogeneration plants; - Increase in the overall energy efficiency of the system by 15–20% due to combined heat and power generation; - Reduction of operating costs due to own energy supply; - Reduction of emissions and increase in environmental friendliness of production; - Guaranteed heat supply regardless of the state of the power grids. Expected effect of the project implementation • Ensuring energy independence of the city's six main boiler houses. • Reduction of electricity consumption from the network by 30–40%. • Increase in fuel utilization ratio from 70% to over 90%. • Reduction of energy and maintenance costs by approximately 15–20% each year. • Reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and increase in environmental compliance of the city's infrastructure. • Increase in the city's resilience to energy crises and emergencies.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

Key problems to be solved by the project 1. High energy dependence of the heat supply system The essence of the problem: All city boiler houses are completely dependent on centralized power supply. During planned or emergency power outages, the operation of pumps, automation and control systems stops, which leads to the cessation of heat supply to consumers. Relevance: In conditions of frequent power outages caused by energy attacks, electricity shortages or network damage, ensuring the autonomy of heat supply is a matter of community safety. Consequences of failure to solve: • Complete or partial cessation of heat supply in the autumn-winter period. • Disruption of the work of schools, kindergartens, hospitals. • Social tension and the risk of emergencies. Expected positive changes: Installation of cogeneration units will ensure autonomous generation of electricity at boiler houses, will allow maintaining the operation of equipment even in the event of a power outage, will reduce the risks of heat outages and increase the energy security of the city. 2. Outdated equipment and low energy efficiency The essence of the problem: Most boiler houses were built more than 30 years ago, their equipment has significant physical and moral wear and tear. The average efficiency of boilers is 70–75%, which leads to fuel overconsumption and high operating costs. Relevance: High energy prices, limited local budget resources and the need to reduce emissions require optimizing energy consumption. Consequences of failure to resolve the issue: • Further increase in fuel and maintenance costs. • Decrease in system reliability. • Inability to meet modern environmental and technical standards. Expected positive changes: The use of cogeneration plants will increase the overall energy efficiency ratio to 90–92%, reduce gas consumption, heat losses and CO₂ emissions, and ensure budget savings. 3. High operating costs of the heat supply enterprise The essence of the problem: Electricity and fuel costs make up the largest share of the cost of heat energy. Due to inefficient generation and outdated technologies, the enterprise is forced to increase tariffs or operate at a loss. Relevance: Economic instability and increased energy tariffs increase the financial burden on utility companies and the population. Consequences of failure to resolve the issue: • Increase in heat tariffs. • Increase in consumer and enterprise debts. • Risk of loss of solvency of the heat supply organization. Expected positive changes: Thanks to its own electricity production, it is expected to reduce operating costs by 15–20%, stabilize the financial condition of the enterprise, and reduce tariff pressure on the population. 4. Risks of disruptions in the provision of socially important services The essence of the problem: The social infrastructure of the city (schools, kindergartens, hospitals, cultural institutions) is completely dependent on centralized heating. Loss of heat during the cold period can pose a threat to the health and safety of residents. Relevance: In conditions of martial law, increasing energy risks, and climate challenges, communities must ensure the uninterrupted functioning of critical infrastructure. Consequences of failure to resolve the issue: • Disruption of the educational process, medical services, and the work of shelters and care facilities. • Social tension among the population. Expected positive changes: Cogeneration plants will create backup sources of energy supply, which will ensure uninterrupted provision of services even in crisis situations. 5. Low level of environmental sustainability and use of modern technologies The essence of the problem: The city's heat supply system does not meet modern requirements of environmental safety and EU climate policy. High CO₂ emissions, inefficient energy use and the absence of renewable components in heat production worsen the environmental situation. Relevance: Ukraine is moving towards green transformation and integration into the European energy market, which requires modernization of the municipal energy sector. Consequences of failure to resolve the issue: • Loss of opportunities to participate in international support programs. • Increased environmental burden on the city. Expected positive changes: The implementation of the project will contribute to reducing harmful emissions, reducing natural gas consumption, increasing energy efficiency and bringing the city closer to "green" energy management standards. Summary The implementation of the project will allow: • to ensure the sustainability of the heat supply of the city of Zlatopil even in conditions of energy crises; • to reduce energy costs and stabilize tariff policy; • to reduce the environmental impact of the heat generation system; • to increase the level of energy security of the community and its preparedness for emergencies; • to create a modern, energy-efficient and environmentally friendly heat supply system focused on people's needs.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of users from low-mobility population groups

2127 human

Population in the geographical area of influence of the project

27897 human

Number of IDPs in the geographical area of impact of the project

7931 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Energy Sector

Subsector

Electric power industry

Stream

Implementation of a distributed generation system for the purpose of uninterrupted and sustainable supply of thermal energy in the city of Zlatopil, Kharkiv region

Strategic document

Task

2.2.1 Ensure proper functioning and modernization of municipal institutions and civil and critical infrastructure facilities

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value

Demand for the service and its dynamics

Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
26
1210 MW
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
27
1210 MW
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
28
1210 MW
Economic justification

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Implementation of a distributed generation system for the purpose of uninterrupted and sustainable supply of thermal energy in the city of Zlatopil, Kharkiv region

Technical Solution 2

Backup power supply of boiler rooms based on diesel generators with modernization of automatic reserve input systems (ATS)

Total costs34'160'000 UAH23'800'000 UAH
  • For preparation
  • 3'076'902 UAH1'200'000 UAH
  • For implementation
  • 31'083'098 UAH18'500'000 UAH
  • For operation
  • 0 UAH4'000'000 UAH
  • For closing
  • 0 UAH100'000 UAH
    Average annual costs0 UAH3'500'000 UAH
    Project duration, incl.7 months10 months
  • Deadline for developing a FFS
  • 1 month3 months
  • Implementation period
  • 6 months7 months
    Service life300 months120 months
    Target indicatorsDefined Defined
    Technical Solution Status
    Active
    Rejected
    Components of a technical solution
    To components
    1
    To components
    0

    Financial justification

    Total project budget

    Total preliminary budget34'160'000 UAH23'800'000 UAH
    Capital costs34'160'000 UAH23'800'000 UAH
    Operational costs0 UAH0 UAH

    Preliminary cost breakdown

    Operating costs for implementation0 UAH0 UAH
    For preparation3'076'902 UAH1'200'000 UAH
    For implementation31'083'098 UAH18'500'000 UAH
    For operation0 UAH4'000'000 UAH
    For closing0 UAH100'000 UAH

    Average project cost per service recipient

    Service UnitСередня вартість проєкту на одного отримувача послуги
    Service Unit Cost1'225 UAH

    Profitability of the project

    Is the project expected to generate income?

    ResponseNoNo

    Project Financing Mechanisms

    Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

    Source and MechanismYesNo

    Funding Sources

    Approved Funds7'869'952 UAH0 UAH
    Expected Funds34'160'000 UAH0 UAH
    Management Rationale

    Risk assessment

    Technical riskDefinedUndefined
    Financial riskDefinedUndefined
    Economic riskDefinedUndefined
    Political riskDefinedUndefined
    Social riskDefinedUndefined
    Market riskDefinedUndefined
    Environmental riskDefinedUndefined
    Results of the feasibility analysis
    Economic Analysis
    Social benefits and costs
    Social benefits • Ensuring uninterrupted heat and electricity supply to residential buildings, social infrastructure facilities and businesses in the event of emergency and planned power outages. • Increasing the level of safety and comfort of life for the population, especially in the autumn-winter period. • Reducing the risks of social tension associated with disruptions in the provision of housing and communal services. • Increasing the resilience of critical community infrastructure facilities in the event of military threats. • Ensuring stable operation of the utility company and preserving jobs. Social costs • Temporary inconvenience to the population during construction and installation work (noise, limited access to certain areas of boiler rooms). • The need to improve the qualifications of personnel to service new equipment.
    Environmental benefits and costs
    Environmental benefits • Increased energy efficiency of the heating system through the use of cogeneration technologies. • Reduced energy losses in the process of producing heat and electricity compared to separate production. • Reduced specific emissions of pollutants and greenhouse gases per unit of energy produced. • Reduced need for diesel generators as the main backup source, which reduces local air pollution. Environmental costs • Slight increase in local emissions at the CHP installation sites associated with the use of natural gas. • Noise and vibration during equipment operation, which are within regulatory values.
    Indirect benefits and costs
    Indirect benefits • Increasing the investment attractiveness of the community due to the availability of reliable engineering infrastructure. • Creating a positive image of the community as one that implements modern energy-efficient solutions. • Reducing financial risks associated with emergency shutdowns of heat supply. • Strengthening the institutional capacity of the local government and the utility company. Indirect costs • Potential increase in costs for maintenance and operation of modern equipment. • Administrative costs associated with project management and work coordination.