Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
State level of SP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
The project involves the construction of a modern anti-radiation shelter (PRU), capable of ensuring the safe stay of students and employees of the lyceum during emergencies. The building will be equipped with the necessary life support systems, ventilation and sanitary and living conditions. Today, the lyceum has only the simplest shelter, designed for 110 people, while the institution has 886 students, 57 teaching staff and 23 specialists and MOP. This amounts to over a thousand people who are in the lyceum every day. The existing protective structures do not meet real needs and cannot guarantee safe shelter for all participants in the educational process. Expected results: Creation of a modern protective structure with sufficient capacity for all students and employees. Ensuring reliable protection of the life and health of children and staff of the institution. The possibility of organizing a continuous educational process even during emergencies. Creating a safe educational environment that meets civil protection requirements and community expectations.
The purpose of the project
Main Goal:
Creation of new facilities and services
Secondary Goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards, Improving the equality of wealth distribution, Improving the condition of infrastructure, Ensuring inclusiveness and equal opportunities, Improving the quality of services, Reducing territorial or social gaps, Meeting demand
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
The purpose of the project is to create a new protective structure for civil protection (radiation shelter, PRU) for Lyceum No. 17 of the Pavlohrad City Council at 71A Centralna Street.
The project is aimed at ensuring safe conditions for students, teaching staff and community residents in the event of emergencies, as well as bringing the infrastructure of the educational institution into line with modern civil protection standards.
Methods of achieving the goal: Development and approval of design and estimate documentation in accordance with the requirements of current legislation and DBN standards. Construction of a new protective structure (PRU) in compliance with the requirements of strength, tightness, radiation protection. Equipment with engineering systems - ventilation, water supply, sewage, power supply and communication systems. Arrangement of internal premises - sanitary facilities, rooms for long-term stay, places for low-mobility groups of the population. Creation of an autonomous and backup power supply system (generators, batteries). Technical and author's supervision of construction to ensure quality and reliability.
Justification of the gap between the current state and the target level
Current state: There is the simplest shelter for 110 people on the territory of Lyceum No. 17. The educational process is in a mixed format, since 886 students study at the institution. The existing infrastructure of the institution does not meet modern requirements in the field of civil defense.
Target level: A functioning protective structure (PRU), capable of simultaneously accommodating the required number of people (for example, 500 people). The uninterrupted functioning of life support systems (power supply, ventilation, water supply, communications) is ensured. Comfortable and safe conditions are created for students, teachers and community residents in case of emergencies.
Gap: Today, there is a small civil defense infrastructure for the educational institution, while the target level provides for the creation of a fully functional protective structure integrated into the community security system. This gap is critical and can only be bridged through the implementation of a public investment project.
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
Key problems to be solved by the project: Insufficient capacity of the existing shelter. Today, Lyceum No. 17 has only the simplest shelter for 110 people, while more than 900 people study and work in the institution. This creates a critical shortage of safe places. Non-compliance with modern civil protection requirements. Low level of safety of students and employees. In the absence of proper protective structures, most participants in the educational process during air raids remain without safe shelter.
Why these problems are relevant now: In conditions of martial law and constant missile and aviation threats, the issue of civil protection is a priority. State standards require that educational institutions have protective structures capable of ensuring the safety of all students and employees. Without the creation of a full-fledged shelter, there are risks of interrupting the educational process and threatening the life and health of children.
Possible consequences if the problems are not resolved: Lack of safe conditions for students and employees during emergencies. The inability to organize the educational process in full due to violation of security requirements. Increased social tension among parents and the community.
Expected positive changes after the implementation of the project: Creation of a modern shelter for 500 people with all the necessary life support systems. Ensuring the safety of students, teachers and community residents in emergency situations. Guaranteed possibility of continuous educational process even during military threats. Compliance of the institution's infrastructure with modern state standards in the field of civil protection.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Number of IDP users
70 human
Number of users from low-mobility population groups
10 human
Number of employees of the institution/institution/organization
80 human
Number of people who will use the service
500 human
Capacity
500 human
Number of IDPs in the geographical area of impact of the project
500 human
Population in the geographical area of influence of the project
5000 human
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Education and science
Subsector
School education
Stream
Efficient and secure infrastructure
Strategic document
Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади
Task
A.2.5. Safe educational environment – construction of protective structures – emotional well-being of participants in the educational process
Project objectives
Indicator
Base value
Target value
Ensuring the safety of students and employees of the educational institution
0 %
100 %
Creating inclusive conditions in a protective structure
0 %
100 %
The level of energy efficiency and autonomy of the facility
0 units
1 units
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Demand for the service and its dynamics
What methodology was used to estimate demand?
Методологія базується на комбінації статистичного аналізу, нормативних розрахунків, прогнозування та врахування соціально-безпекових чинників.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
920 human
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
2
955 human
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
3
970 human
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Transition to a circular economy
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change mitigation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Climate change adaptation
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Have the greenhouse gas emissions or emission reductions (Scope 1-2) associated with the project been calculated for a typical year and the entire project period?
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in accordance with the Law of Ukraine "On Environmental Impact Assessment"?
Conducting an EIA is not required.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
Other benefits from project implementation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to safe water, food, and medical services
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were consultations held with representatives of target groups to take into account gender equality issues in the project?
Focus groups or consultations with women and vulnerable groups were held
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Women's participation is ensured at various stages of planning (including public hearings)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Have the gender risks and social impacts of the project been assessed?
All possible positive impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
A plan to mitigate negative social impacts focused on women has been developed
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
The percentage of women who will gain new educational/professional opportunities is quantified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
All possible negative impacts of the project on women, men or other gender groups have been identified
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there management and institutional mechanisms in place to ensure gender equality?
A policy/code of conduct on non-discrimination and gender equality has been developed
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Mandatory training for project staff on gender equality and inclusion is provided
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
New construction of a civil defense structure (CDS) for 500 people by Lyceum No. 17 of the Pavlohrad City Council
Technical Solution 2
Construction of a modular prefabricated civil defense structure (CDS) on the territory of the lyceum
Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)138'260'000 UAH30'000'000 UAH
For preparation3'600'000 UAH1'200'000 UAH
For implementation134'660'000 UAH28'800'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost6'170'000 UAH1'000'000 UAH
For operation1'430'000 UAH600'000 UAH
For closing4'740'000 UAH400'000 UAH
Average annual costs1'430'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.13 months7 months
Deadline for developing a FFS3 months2 months
Implementation period10 months5 months
Service life1200 months300 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, both national and international
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
What procurement strategy was chosen for the project implementation, and what justifies its feasibility in the context of the market and project objectives?
Основною стратегією закупівель є проведення відкритих конкурентних торгів через систему ProZorro для всіх ключових категорій витрат (будівельно-монтажні роботи, закупівля обладнання, технічний нагляд). Масштаб проєкту (143 млн грн) вимагає максимальної прозорості та конкуренції; на ринку існує достатня кількість національних і міжнародних підрядників та постачальників, здатних виконати роботи; відкриті торги дозволять залучити як великі компанії, так і МСП (малі та середні підприємства); відповідність чинному законодавству України у сфері публічних закупівель.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What approaches are planned to be used to ensure transparency, competition, and efficiency in the procurement process?
Для забезпечення прозорості, конкуренції та ефективності будуть застосовані такі інструменти: електронна система ProZorro для всіх закупівель; публікація тендерної документації та результатів у відкритому доступі; залучення незалежного технічного та фінансового нагляду; публічне звітування на рівні міської ради щодо етапів реалізації; застосування чітких критеріїв оцінки пропозицій: ціна, якість, досвід, гарантійні зобов’язання.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What types of procurement procedures are envisaged by the project (open tender, negotiated procedure, competitive dialogue, etc.)?
Open competitive bidding
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Other
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Competitive dialogue
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Direct negotiation procedures
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Pre-market engagement
Для визначення можливостей ринку було здійснено: аналіз відкритих тендерів у системі ProZorro за аналогічними будівельними проєктами (захисні споруди, укриття, об’єкти освіти); консультації з експертами у сфері цивільного захисту та будівництва; аналіз реалізованих проектів у Дніпропетровській області (зокрема, модернізації та будівництва укриттів у школах та лікарнях); збір комерційних пропозицій від підрядних організацій щодо вартості будівельно-монтажних робіт та інженерних мереж.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Potential market participants
Ринок має достатній рівень конкуренції, очікується участь 5–7 потенційних підрядників. Серед можливих учасників: будівельні компанії регіонального рівня (ТОВ «Будмонтажсервіс», ПП «УкрБудДніпро» тощо); національні підрядники з досвідом у будівництві інженерних споруд (ТОВ «Інтербудмонтаж», ПрАТ «Київметробуд»); компанії-постачальники обладнання (систем вентиляції, генераторів, електротехнічного обладнання); інженерні та проєктні організації, які можуть надавати технічний супровід. Це дозволяє очікувати реальну конкуренцію, що стимулюватиме якість виконання робіт і контроль вартості.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Market readiness assessment
Ринок готовий до реалізації проєкту: в Україні є достатньо кваліфікованих виконавців із досвідом у будівництві захисних споруд та об’єктів освіти; необхідні технології та ресурси доступні на внутрішньому ринку (залізобетонні конструкції, вентиляційні системи, системи енергозабезпечення); потенційними бар’єрами можуть бути: коливання цін на будматеріали, логістичні затримки та бюрократичні процедури погодження; ризики регуляторного характеру мінімальні, оскільки проєкт відповідає вимогам ДБН та законодавства у сфері цивільного захисту.
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget144'430'000 UAH31'000'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)138'260'000 UAH30'000'000 UAH
For preparation3'600'000 UAH1'200'000 UAH
For implementation134'660'000 UAH28'800'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost6'170'000 UAH1'000'000 UAH
For operation1'430'000 UAH600'000 UAH
For closing4'740'000 UAH400'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service UnitСередня вартість на 1 особу
Service Unit Cost154'153 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Is the project self-sustaining?No
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management Rationale
Team competencies
Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - economic analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - communication with stakeholders
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - risk management
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - social and gender analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - public consultations
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of available procurement options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project management - legal support
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial analysis - financial analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic rationale - demand analysis
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Business case - analysis of the market environment
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
No, this is the first project of its kind.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
Economic feasibility study - technical expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic justification - environmental expertise
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management rationale - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project management structure defined: working group, chair, project team?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
What categories of experts and consultants have already been involved at the project preparation stage?
Environmental experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial consultants/modelers
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Legal consultants
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Economic analysts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Strategic consultants
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Technical experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Social/gender consultants
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Management experts / project managers
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there plans to involve experts and consultants for further implementation of the project?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Risk assessment
Technical riskDefinedUndefined
Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Economic riskDefinedUndefined
Political riskDefinedUndefined
Social riskDefinedUndefined
Operational riskDefinedUndefined
Market riskDefinedUndefined
Environmental riskDefinedUndefined
Other riskDefinedUndefined
Organizational events
ResponseDefinedUndefined
Team involvement
How exactly are/will stakeholders be involved?
Focus group
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Online survey
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Meetings with local authorities
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Public consultations
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Public hearings
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
When are/will engagement activities be taking place?
At the project monitoring stage
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
At the project implementation stage
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
At the project preparation stage
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
How is/will the public be informed about the importance of participation and available channels for feedback?
In another way
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Оголошення у ліцеї, інформаційні стенди, листи батькам
Official websites
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Social networks
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Local media
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are public hearings being held/will they be held (offline, online)?
Yes, online
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Через zoom
Who will attend the public hearings?
Representatives of public organizations
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Community representatives
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Government officials
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Public hearings have already been held
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Is there ongoing cooperation or support within the framework of international technical assistance (ITA) or from other donor or government agencies?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project require preparation assistance from Project Preparation Programs (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
None of the options are applicable
Need for financing
Does the project require additional funding for preparation?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
22/10/2025SP-L-221025-D8C0793BCommunity SPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeCompliance strategy confirmed-
11/01/2026SP-N-110126-9759A149State SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
24/10/2025SPP-L-241025-1D8EB510Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-73