Reconstruction of sewage pumping station 2 in Konotop

Sector
Municipal infrastructure and services
Stream
Restoration, development and modernization of centralized water supply and wastewater infrastructure, including the introduction of alternative energy sources
Maturity level
85
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The reconstruction of sewage pumping station 2 in Konotop will ensure the pumping of wastewater to treatment plants for their further purification and bringing their indicators to regulatory standards, and will create conditions for comfortable living for residents of Roman Shukhevych Street by ensuring the proper functioning of the centralized wastewater system

The purpose of the project

Main Goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards

Secondary Goal:

Improving the condition of infrastructure, Improving the quality of services

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The reconstruction of sewage pumping station 2 in Konotop will ensure the pumping of wastewater to treatment plants for their further purification and bringing their indicators to regulatory standards, which will create conditions for comfortable living for residents of Roman Shukhevych Street by ensuring the proper functioning of the centralized wastewater system.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

The building of the sewage pumping station on the street. Roman Shukhevych Street 1a, put into operation in 1963. The identified defects and damage to the building structures of the station significantly reduce the strength, stability and rigidity of these structures. Sewage Pumping Station 2 requires urgent reconstruction The reconstruction of the sewage pumping station 2 in Konotop will ensure the pumping of wastewater to treatment plants for their further purification and bringing their indicators to regulatory standards

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of people who will use the service

8280 human

Other functional

800 m3

Other functional

326414 kW

Number of IDP users

233 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Municipal infrastructure and services

Subsector

Water supply and sanitation

Stream

Restoration, development and modernization of centralized water supply and wastewater infrastructure, including the introduction of alternative energy sources

Strategic document

Регіональна стратегія розвитку

Task

1.4.1 High-quality housing and communal services

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
Number of modernized, reconstructed, upgraded centralized water supply and wastewater infrastructure facilities/networks
0 units
1 units

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Опитування населення м.Конотоп щодо потреби у реконструкції КНС
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
8280 human
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
Calculation of benefits and costs of housing and communal services.docx
24.11.2025
13:33:24 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Reconstruction of the sewage pumping station KNS-2 at 1a Roman Shukhevych Street in Konotop, Sumy region

Technical Solution 2

New construction of a sewage pumping station in the city of Konotop, Sumy region

Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)20'419'975 UAH25'800'000 UAH
For preparation567'864 UAH800'000 UAH
For implementation19'852'111 UAH25'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost1'314'000 UAH1'314'000 UAH
For operation1'300'000 UAH1'300'000 UAH
For closing14'000 UAH14'000 UAH
Average annual costs1'300'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.9 months22 months
Deadline for developing a FFS6 months10 months
Implementation period3 months12 months
Service life360 months360 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active

[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Rejected

[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Components of a technical solution
To components
1
To components
0

Commercial Justification

Supplier and contractor market assessment

Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial justification

Total project budget

Total preliminary budget21'733'975 UAH27'114'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)20'419'975 UAH25'800'000 UAH
For preparation567'864 UAH800'000 UAH
For implementation19'852'111 UAH25'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost1'314'000 UAH1'314'000 UAH
For operation1'300'000 UAH1'300'000 UAH
For closing14'000 UAH14'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Average project cost per service recipient

Service UnitВартість на 1 людину
Service Unit Cost2'434 UAH

Profitability of the project

Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo

Availability of services

Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Financing Mechanisms

Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

Source and MechanismYesNo

Funding Sources

Approved Funds11'463'466 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds11'463'466 UAH0 UAH

Public-private partnership

Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Management Rationale

Team competencies

Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - economic analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - communication with stakeholders

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - risk management

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - social and gender analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - public consultations

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of available procurement options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - legal support

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - working with international financial organizations (IFOs)

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial analysis - financial analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - demand analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - environmental expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of the market environment

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Partially, we have limited experience

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Risk assessment

Operational riskDefinedUndefined
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

None of the options are applicable

Project Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
24/11/2025SP-L-241125-ADE8D14FCommunity SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
21/03/2026SP-N-210326-AB630CCAState SPInvestment Feasibility StudyAwaiting review--
08/12/2025SPP-L-081225-36DA9E1CCommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-85