Repair and restoration work of the old building of Konotop Lyceum No. 12 of the Konotop City Council of the Sumy region at the address: Sumy region, Konotop city, Yaroslav the Wise st., 2 (installation of an automatic fire alarm system, notification of people about a fire and transmission of alarm notifications)
Sector
Education and science
Stream
Arrangement of safe conditions in institutions providing general secondary education (fire protection)
Maturity level
85
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
The automatic fire alarm system is designed to automatically detect signs of fire in the controlled premises of the facility and issue sound and light fire alarm signals directly at the facility.
To perform the above functions, the project provides for the following:
- Installation of a fire alarm receiving and control device.
- - Installation of automatic fire detectors in all controlled premises to detect signs of fire.
- - Installation of manual fire detectors on evacuation routes (exits) for manual forced activation of the fire alarm.
The purpose of the project
Main Goal:
Meeting demand
Secondary Goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards, Improving the quality of services
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
Strengthening the security of the educational environment in secondary education institutions under the legal regime of martial law
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Number of people who will use the service
600 human
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Education and science
Subsector
School education
Stream
Arrangement of safe conditions in institutions providing general secondary education (fire protection)
Strategic document
Регіональна стратегія розвитку
Task
2.1.2 Creating a safe, high-quality, comfortable educational environment
Project objectives
Indicator
Base value
Target value
Arrangement of safe conditions in institutions providing general secondary education (fire protection)
0.01 units
0.01 units
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Demand for the service and its dynamics
What methodology was used to estimate demand?
Опитування учнів та батьків
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
500 human
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
None of the options are applicable
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will create jobs available to women (temporarily or permanently)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
Repair and restoration work of the old building of Konotop Lyceum No. 12 of the Konotop City Council of Sumy Region at the address: Sumy Region, Konotop, Yaroslava Mudryho St., 2 (installation of an automatic fire alarm system, notifying people about a fire and transmitting alarm notifications)
Technical Solution 2
Installation of an automatic fire alarm system, notifying people about a fire and transmitting alarm notifications in the new building of Konotop Lyceum No. 12
Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)1'772'590 UAH2'100'000 UAH
For preparation80'000 UAH100'000 UAH
For implementation1'692'590 UAH2'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost46'000 UAH60'000 UAH
For operation36'000 UAH50'000 UAH
For closing10'000 UAH10'000 UAH
Average annual costs36'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.18 months32 months
Deadline for developing a FFS6 months8 months
Implementation period12 months24 months
Service life300 months120 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, only national
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget1'818'590 UAH2'160'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)1'772'590 UAH2'100'000 UAH
For preparation80'000 UAH100'000 UAH
For implementation1'692'590 UAH2'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost46'000 UAH60'000 UAH
For operation36'000 UAH50'000 UAH
For closing10'000 UAH10'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service UnitВартість на одного отримувача послуги
Service Unit Cost2'820 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Management Rationale
Team competencies
Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
None of the options are applicable
Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Partially, we have limited experience
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
None of the options are applicable
Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Risk assessment
Other riskDefinedUndefined
Team involvement
How exactly are/will stakeholders be involved?
Online survey
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Meetings with local authorities
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Public consultations
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Public hearings
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
When are/will engagement activities be taking place?
At the project monitoring stage
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
At the project preparation stage
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
How is/will the public be informed about the importance of participation and available channels for feedback?
Social networks
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Local media
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Are public hearings being held/will they be held (offline, online)?
Yes, online
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
У звя'зку з воєнним станом
Who will attend the public hearings?
Representatives of public organizations
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Experts
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Community representatives
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Government officials
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Public hearings have already been held
No
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
26/11/2025SP-L-261125-40BD05C2Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
08/12/2025SPP-L-081225-CF532CBCCommunity SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude-85