Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion
- General information
- Strategic Case
- Economic Case
- Commercial Case
- Financial Case
- Management Case
- Summary
General information
Description of the project
The project "Overhaul of the road with laying a gas pipeline for gasification of the serving cooperatives "Ryabinka" and "Ryabinka dva"" provides for a comprehensive renovation of the road surface and at the same time laying a gas pipeline, which will ensure reliable transport infrastructure and gasification of the cooperatives. The main objectives of the project are to eliminate damage to the road, increase the level of safety and comfort of traffic, as well as ensure a sustainable supply of gas for the needs of residents. This will solve the problems of poor road surface, unsatisfactory transport accessibility and lack of gas supply. Expected results: improved road quality, which will contribute to reducing transport costs and increasing safety; reducing emissions due to the use of gas instead of other types of fuel; increasing the level of comfort and social development of the cooperatives "Ryabinka" and "Ryabinka dva".
The purpose of the project
Main Goal:
Improving the condition of infrastructure
Secondary Goal:
Increasing compliance with modern standards
Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it
Improving transport and engineering infrastructure by carrying out major repairs of the road and laying a gas pipeline for gasification of the serving cooperatives "Ryabinka" and "Ryabinka dva".
Ways to achieve the goal:
- carrying out major repairs of the road surface;
- construction and connection of the gas pipeline to the network;
- ensuring technical supervision and compliance with modern construction standards.
Currently, there is no high-quality road and gas supply system, which limits residents' access to basic utilities and creates discomfort in movement. The implementation of the project will ensure safe transport connections and reliable gas supply, which will increase the quality of life and the level of improvement of the territory.
Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation
The main problems are the poor condition of the road and the lack of gas supply to the cooperatives "Ryabinky" and "Ryabinky dva". This complicates transport connections, increases the risk of emergencies, and residents are forced to use inefficient and expensive energy sources. Failure to resolve these problems will deepen social and infrastructural inequality. The implementation of the project will ensure safe travel, reliable gas supply, and improve the living conditions of the population.
Socio-economic context
Indicator
Value
Other functional
1500 m
Strategic Case
Strategic feasibility of the project
Sector
Transport Sector
Subsector
Road transport and road infrastructure
Stream
Development and restoration of public road infrastructure
Strategic document
Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади
Task
1.3.4 Ensure the restoration of transport infrastructure facilities and transport connections between settlements in the community
Project objectives
Project objectives were not specified by the initiator
Project Sustainable Development Goals
Demand for the service and its dynamics
What methodology was used to estimate demand?
Для оцінки попиту застосовано комплексну методологію, що включає збір даних про стан інфраструктури, аналіз потреб мешканців у якісній дорозі та газифікації, а також розрахунок очікуваного споживання ресурсів.
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
1500 vehicles
Economic justification
Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change
Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?
None of the options are applicable
Project sustainability and inclusivity
Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?
Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Alternative technical solutions
Technical Solution 1
Major road repairs with laying a gas pipeline for gasification of the service cooperatives "Ryabinka" and "Ryabinka Dva"
Technical Solution 2
Introducing innovative construction technologies, such as cold recycling of asphalt concrete pavement, which reduce costs and environmental impact.
Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)27'000'000 UAH5'800'000 UAH
For preparation2'000'000 UAH800'000 UAH
For implementation25'000'000 UAH5'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost4'000'000 UAH1'350'000 UAH
For operation3'000'000 UAH1'200'000 UAH
For closing1'000'000 UAH150'000 UAH
Average annual costs200'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.6 months6 months
Deadline for developing a FFS2 months2 months
Implementation period4 months4 months
Service life180 months96 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active
[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Rejected
[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]
Components of a technical solution
Commercial Justification
Supplier and contractor market assessment
Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, both national and international
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Financial justification
Total project budget
Total preliminary budget31'000'000 UAH7'150'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)27'000'000 UAH5'800'000 UAH
For preparation2'000'000 UAH800'000 UAH
For implementation25'000'000 UAH5'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost4'000'000 UAH1'350'000 UAH
For operation3'000'000 UAH1'200'000 UAH
For closing1'000'000 UAH150'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Average project cost per service recipient
Service UnitСередня вартість проєкту на одного отримувача послуги (одиницю послуги) становить приблизно 7 143 грн з ПДВ. Цей розрахунок базується на загальній орієнтовній вартості проєкту 30 000 000 грн з ПДВ та кількості отримувачів послуги (приблизно 4 200 осіб у кооперативах «Рябинки» та «Рябинки два»).
Service Unit Cost7'143 UAH
Profitability of the project
Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo
Availability of services
Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Financing Mechanisms
Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?
Source and MechanismYesNo
Funding Sources
Approved Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds0 UAH0 UAH
Public-private partnership
Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
The project does not fall under the PPP format by its nature/character
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs
Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?
Finalization of existing documentation for the preparation of a preliminary feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of the feasibility study
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Updating existing documentation regarding the preparation of design and estimate documentation (DED)
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]
Project Approval History
DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
11/11/2025SP-L-111125-0DB38518Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeStrategic fit confirmed.-
17/11/2025SPP-L-171125-9EEE17F0Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeStrategic fit confirmed75