Major repairs to the foundation of building No. 2 of the Shchyretsk secondary education institution of grades I-III of the Shchyretsk settlement council of the Lviv district of the Lviv region

Sector
Education and science
Stream
Ensuring quality school education through the expansion, development and modernization of general secondary education institutions
Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study
Project Status
Investment Feasibility Study
Entry into Portfolio
Local level of SPP
Implementation
Completion

General information

Description of the project

The major repair of the foundation of building No. 2 of the Shchyretsk secondary education institution of grades I-III of the Shchyretsk settlement council of the Lviv district of the Lviv region involves carrying out a complex of works aimed at restoring and strengthening the foundation of the building. The purpose of the project is to ensure the reliability and durability of structures, create safe conditions for students to study and the work of the teaching staff. The works include dismantling damaged areas, waterproofing, strengthening load-bearing elements and restoring external landscaping. The implementation of the project will contribute to the extension of the operational life of the building and improving the infrastructure of the educational institution.

The purpose of the project

Main Goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards

Secondary Goal:

Increasing compliance with modern standards, Improving the condition of infrastructure

Description of the purpose of the project and ways to achieve it

The project for the overhaul of the foundation of building No. 2 of the Shchyretsk secondary education institution of grades I-III aims to strengthen and restore the foundation of the building to ensure its safe and long-term operation. The implementation involves a technical inspection, dismantling of damaged areas, restoration and strengthening of the foundation using modern materials, and strengthening of load-bearing structures.

Problems and solutions resulting from project implementation

The key problems in the implementation of this project are: a worn foundation, moisture penetration and limited use of the premises. Building No. 2 of the Shchyretskyi ZZSO of I-III levels is actively used, and further delay may lead to an emergency and stop the educational process. The consequences of not resolving the project implementation are the destruction of the building, risks to safety and loss of access to education. Expected changes are the restoration of the building's reliability, safe conditions for students and teachers, full use of educational premises, improvement of the educational infrastructure of the community.

Socio-economic context

Indicator

Value

Number of people who will use the service

329 human

Number of IDP users

3 human

Strategic Case

Strategic feasibility of the project

Sector

Education and science

Subsector

School education

Stream

Ensuring quality school education through the expansion, development and modernization of general secondary education institutions

Strategic document

Стратегія розвитку територіальної громади

Task

3.2 Ensuring access to quality education

Project objectives

Indicator
Base value
Target value
Improving learning and working conditions
75 %
100 %
increasing the durability of the building
10 year
30 year
access to safe spaces
80 %
100 %

Project Sustainable Development Goals

Demand for the service and its dynamics

What methodology was used to estimate demand?

Враховано кількість учнів у закладі,оцінка відповідності наявних площ державним стандартам щодо кількості учнів на клас та безпечних умов навчання
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has data from external sources been used in the demand assessment?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the demand forecast take into account the latest demographic and economic forecasts?

Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Indicator
Year
Demand
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
1
329 human
Annual demand for services/infrastructure
2
250 human
Economic justification

Analysis of the project's impact on ecology and climate change

Does the planned activity have a potential positive contribution to achieving climate or environmental objectives?

Pollution prevention and control
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the proposed project expected to significantly harm any of the following climate or environmental objectives?

None of the options are applicable

Project sustainability and inclusivity

Identify potential gender risks of the project and indicate possible ways to overcome them:

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
There are risks of impaired mobility or safety for women, men and other gender groups during construction/operation
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the project provide for improving women's access to services?

Not applicable to my project
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
The project will improve women's access to education (primary, secondary, vocational)
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are civil society organizations representing women and vulnerable groups included in the consultation process?

No
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Documents

Name
Date
economic analysis of major repairs to the foundation (1) (1).docx
21.04.2026
06:48:06 UTC

Alternative technical solutions

Technical Solution 1

Major repairs to the foundation of building No. 2 of the Shchyretsk secondary education institution of grades I-III of the Shchyretsk settlement council of the Lviv district of the Lviv region

Technical Solution 2

Comprehensive modernization of the foundation of building No. 2 of Shchyretskyi ZZSO of I-III levels, Lviv district, Lviv region

Cost breakdownCost justificationCost justification
Project cost (preparation and implementation)1'587'382 UAH9'500'000 UAH
For preparation118'000 UAH500'000 UAH
For implementation1'469'382 UAH9'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost0 UAH1'000'000 UAH
For operation0 UAH500'000 UAH
For closing0 UAH500'000 UAH
Average annual costs20'000 UAH0 UAH
Project duration, incl.7 months14 months
Deadline for developing a FFS1 month2 months
Implementation period6 months12 months
Service life480 months600 months
Target indicatorsDefined Defined
Technical Solution Status
Active

[The technical approach was selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Rejected

[The technical approach was not selected for further detailed analysis or implementation.]

Components of a technical solution
To components
0
To components
0

Commercial Justification

Supplier and contractor market assessment

Is the project likely to attract a sufficient number of bidders to ensure real competition that will encourage bidders to think innovatively and maximize the quality of their proposals?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is the project of interest to small and medium-sized enterprises?
Yes

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Will the project involve national or international suppliers and contractors?
Yes, both national and international

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Has an analysis of available procurement options been conducted for the technical solution?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial justification

Total project budget

Total preliminary budget1'587'382 UAH10'500'000 UAH
Project cost (preparation and implementation)1'587'382 UAH9'500'000 UAH
For preparation118'000 UAH500'000 UAH
For implementation1'469'382 UAH9'000'000 UAH
Project operation and closure cost0 UAH1'000'000 UAH
For operation0 UAH500'000 UAH
For closing0 UAH500'000 UAH
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]
Were the methodological recommendations approved by the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine applied when calculating the indicative budget?
Yes
[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Average project cost per service recipient

Service UnitВартість на одного отримувача послуги
Service Unit Cost4'825 UAH

Profitability of the project

Is the project expected to generate income?NoNo

Availability of services

Has an analysis been conducted of the accessibility of services for consumers and their financial ability to pay the established tariffs?
Not applicable – the project does not provide for the provision of paid services or the establishment of tariffs

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project Financing Mechanisms

Are funding sources and mechanisms identified?

Source and MechanismYesNo

Funding Sources

Approved Funds1'587'382 UAH0 UAH
Expected Funds1'587'382 UAH0 UAH

Public-private partnership

Has a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the project's suitability for implementation through a PPP mechanism been conducted?
No, no assessment was conducted.

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Are there, after conducting an appropriate study, private investors interested in the possibility of implementing the project in the PPP format?
No

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Management Rationale

Team competencies

Determine which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation can be provided by the project initiator's own project team (without involving external advisors)
Strategic justification - analysis of the strategic feasibility of the project

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - economic analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - communication with stakeholders

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - risk management

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - social and gender analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - public consultations

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic feasibility study - technical expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of available procurement options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Project management - legal support

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - SDG compliance analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Financial analysis - financial analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Strategic rationale - demand analysis

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Economic justification - environmental expertise

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Business case - analysis of the market environment

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Does the team have experience implementing similar projects?
Yes, successfully implemented 1 or more similar projects

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Identify which competencies/expertise required for successful project preparation and implementation need to be strengthened by engaging independent experts or consultants
Management justification - legal support

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Is there an understanding of where to find relevant experts and consultants?
Partially, we are considering options

[Response was provided in the Preliminary Investment Feasibility Study]

Risk assessment

Financial riskDefinedUndefined
Social riskDefinedUndefined

Team involvement

How exactly are/will stakeholders be involved?
Meetings with local authorities

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

When are/will engagement activities be taking place?
At the project monitoring stage

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

At the project implementation stage

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

At the project preparation stage

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

How is/will the public be informed about the importance of participation and available channels for feedback?
In another way

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

обговорення на сесії
Are public hearings being held/will they be held (offline, online)?
Yes, offline.

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

обговорення на сесії з депутатами селищної ради
Who will attend the public hearings?
Community representatives

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Government officials

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Public hearings have already been held
No

[Response was provided in the Investment Feasibility Study]

Results of the feasibility analysis
Project Preparation Program Engagement and Funding Needs

Does the project require additional preparation assistance from Project Preparation Facilities (PPF)?

None of the options are applicable

Project Approval History

DateDecision NumberPortfolioProject StatusDecisionReasonsMaturity level
21/04/2026SP-L-210426-8BF794C8Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyNot approvedthe effectiveness of this project is not sufficiently substantiated-
21/04/2026SP-L-210426-D7E38698Community SPInvestment Feasibility StudyInclude--
24/04/2026SPP-L-240426-7EF5D9E4Community SPPInvestment Feasibility StudyIncludeA decision was made to amend the community's EPP and include this project in the EPP.-